Sentences with phrase «debate is over»

I discussed Why The Vaccination Debate Is Over and opened the floodgates to the anti-vax brigade, who turn out to be every bit as rabid as the lactivists and the fativists.

Since you have had such great results with the calcium carbonate, my debate is over!

The debate is over whether Bitcoin will be a successful long run innovation or fizzle out like so many prior innovations.

The debate is over.

It is now nearly nine months since the master of the rolls, Lord Neuberger, declared at the launch of Lord Justice Jackson's final report, that the «time for discussion and debate is over».

Most of the time the debate is over the form and interpretation of the contract, not over whether someone signed it.

Only in this case, the debate is over whether the state should open a public law school as part of the University of Massachusetts.

And yet the «debate is over»?

I find this ironic given that you are presumably on the same side of the argument as Dan Kahan who is quoted as saying [T] here's good reason to believe that the self - righteous and contemptuous tone with which the «scientific consensus» point is typically advanced («assault on reason,» «the debate is over» etc.) deepens polarization.

(I can't spell) One thing that really irks me is the statement repeated over and over that any one that the debate is over.

In that piece, he implies that, regardless of what his data collection efforts reveal, his mind is already made up: ««The debate is over,» he says.

the debate is over in terms of whether humans are contributing to climate change.

Phil, I started questioning this when Al Gore said «The debate is over.

The ire from the «deniers» is that we were bullied and told we were stupid for not accepting that the debate is over and yet we find new holes in the so called accepted science of AGW.

When people say «the debate is over», etc., this is not the IPCC saying this.

But now, it appears the debate is over and

If that's all you're claiming when you say the debate is over, then I have little argument with you.

And Beck ended the special by saying that scientists who are «just yelling, «The debate is over, and these people are heretics or Nazis,» as loud as you can is not really the best way to advance science.»

The Conversation wraps up Clearing up the Climate Debate with a statement from our authors: the debate is over.

Arnold Schwarzenegger «I say the [global warming] debate is over.

The time for debate is over.

I was — and the words «the science is settled» and «the debate is over» were most certainly being used then, but NOT by the «contrarians».

Despite this evidence that the hypothesis was failing, Al Gore in his infamous 2007 US Congressional appearance said, «The debate is over.

If one starts from the view that «the debate is over» and «the science is settled», and that all that is necessary to win the debate is to tell the consensus story, it is by definition, an appeal to authority: it's not me who is saying it; it's not my opinion; it is science `.

To the extent that anyone has said that the scientific debate is over, this is what they are referring to.

But I do deny that the debate is over about the actual extent of man's influence.

He then went on the say that climate change is real but the debate is over whether or not it is manmade or natural.»

If the debate is over, why all the fuss?

Telling people the debate is over, the science is settled, now do as we say or the world is doomed is a poor way to get one's message across.

They have denied doubt: the science is settled, the debate is over so we must act.

Increasingly, Environmentalists are drawing on the putative certainties of science — «The debate is over», «The science is in» — rather than its inherent provisionality, to support their politics.

The science is settled and the debate is over for the Warmists.

What's irrelevent is this whole piece, perhaps you didn't get the memo but the climate debate is over.

Now what do you think about Mr. Gore's stand that «the debate is over» or that steady drumbeat of press reports about the «consensus of scientists»?

Ian Forrester, if anybodies got closed minds it's the «debate is over» and «there's a consensus» crowd.

«While its good to see Meet the Press waking up to the fact that climate change is an issue — the debate is over.

Unfortunately for CEI, that debate is over.

It is therefore correct, indeed verging on compulsory in the scientific tradition, to be skeptical of those who express certainty that «the science is settled» and «the debate is over».

Because in a world defined by, and seen only through the climate change debate, once the principal debate is over, you also lose your orientation and perspective.

From a historical perspective, no system as complex as science was cracked by man in as little as 30 years, but it is not unusual that people try to declare that the debate is over (The phlogiston theory of combustion is settled science!)

Despite the press releases of James Hansen, Gavin Schmidt, Michael Mann and others claiming the debate is over, there are a large number of of scientists who are no less qualified and are more qualified in climate science and the atmospheric sciences who strongly dispute such claims.

A draft (PDF) of the agreement said, «Although additional research may be needed to help the public and policymakers better understand Alaska's changing climate and how to anticipate and respond to its effects, the time for climate debate is over; it is now time for climate action.»

But intuitively to me an integration is better, because the main debate is over heat being trapped.)

That debate is over.

Probably the same 97 % that tell us the «Debate Is Over».

Scientists show they agree with the decision that they debate is over, not through their words, but through their actions..

because they know better and because scientists don't decide when the debate is over.

One can argue that the science is settled by saying «the science is settled»» the debate is over» «there is a consensus»» we know we are not wrong»

no scientist, i don't care how many nobel prizes, or degrees or panels of other scientists you may have, can look at a pile of data, that is somewhat leaning to one conclusion or the other, and declare, «the science is in, the debate is over».

One of the deadly memes for AGW is the meme of «the debate is over», «the science is settled».