But he forced the nation to think, interpret and raise heated
debate like almost no other cinematic fiction has done.
Not exact matches
like former leader... we too have kept open house and had people live with us long and short term for nearly all our married life... we've had
debate, argument, sadness, hilarity... even had someone with a disturbing psychosis... not at one stage have we felt the need to make any rules... that would
almost be
like copping out of relationship.
It's
almost like Chad can't understand that the
debate isn't «Is the bible really old?»
Think of it
almost like school shootings: whenever one happens, the gun
debate is reopened.
And the voters
liked them: viewing figures were high, reaching a peak audience of
almost 10 million, and many said afterwards that the
debates had affected their voting intentions.
i must be confused... it
almost sounds
like Andrew was the lone holdout yet it was Paladino who was the last to agree to the
debate... If Paladino is so much in support of giving these third party candidates an opportunity to speak, why did nt he sign on before Cuomo?
The remainder of the film jumps back and forth redundantly between increasingly shouty
debates of this ilk and ever more questionable missions, as Graver and Alejandro are revealed to have an
almost God -
like grasp on affairs and the cost of fighting drugs is hammered home again and again.
It feels
like almost everything of note gets lost in
debates about whether «school choice works» and amidst hoary claims of «privatization.»
«This
debate ran for
almost three hours and arose because there were in excess of 100,000 signatories to a petition driven and supported by the
likes of our peers and friends at Bacc to the Future and ourselves.»
This is always a
debate among value investors: Is it better to look for asset based investments
like Graham / Schloss and other deep value school, or is it better to strive for great businesses at reasonable prices that are
almost certain to compound intrinsic value over time?
Almost from its birth, historians have
debated whether Mannerism,
like Postmodernism now, brings anything new.
Behind edge - driven
debates,
almost everyone I've met who's seriously pursuing a post-fossil energy future would
like all of the above — more science literacy, more energy awareness, more energy access now for those in deep poverty, lower costs for energy all around and some kind of price on the most polluting fuels (see the Niskanen Center's «Conservative Case for a Carbon Tax» to see the breadth of support).
I thought the Obama White House had brought something useful to the budget
debate with its visual depiction of United States spending — which revealed the profound growth in politically untouchable programs and the
almost invisible dimensions of programs on education, research, innovation, development assistance and the
like.
While some harms,
like those of a collapsing AMOC, are still up for
debate, it is
almost completely certain that climate change will bring serious consequences for us in our time.
The CSIRO's chief has told the ABC the backlash from his decision to restructure the organisation has made him feel
like an «early climate scientist in the»70s fighting against the oil lobby» and that there is so much emotion in the
debate it
almost «sounds more
like religion than science».
It is
almost like hearing programmers
debate the pros and cons of Java.
The rational
debate considers what measures are needed to track and, if necessary, take action when Canadians head overseas to join up with a group
like Islamic State, thus
almost inevitably becoming implicated in such international crimes as war crimes and crimes against humanity, and nationally criminal acts of terrorism.