This brochure aims to contribute to the emerging
debate on adaptation to climate variability and change and sustainable development.
Not exact matches
Just when the theological
debate surrounding the release of the big - screen
adaptation of the novel The Shack had died down, Twitter user Erik Reed has just conceived of a film that is putting the heresy police back
on their toes.
And the political
debate of mitigation or
adaptation surely hinges
on the science, eg
on climate sensitivity.
Also this kind of wraps up any
debate on whether or not the Green Lantern movie
adaptation is going to be a gritty, real world version of the comic.
And the political
debate of mitigation or
adaptation surely hinges
on the science, eg
on climate sensitivity.
There is no need for
debate of denialist / delusionist fringe talking points (such as Globul Coolin», the Sun, CO2 ain't no ding - dang pollutant, Green Fascists, or other FUD phrases), as society has moved
on and is
debating adaptation and mitigation.
Much of the
debate in Lima centered
on what countries should include in their INDCs; how long should the commitments be for; should the commitments include financing and
adaptation goals; and that old chestnut: how should the commitments of developed and developing countries be differentiated.
This report seeks to ground the
debate on climate finance in an objective analysis of ongoing efforts to finance mitigation and
adaptation in developing countries.
Fierce policy
debates about responsibility for climate mitigation and
adaptation have long focused
on the «common but differentiated responsibilities» of nations, the framework used for the Paris climate negotiations.
Just admit it is real and get
on to where the real scientific
debate is, impacts and mitigation vs.
adaptation.
As are
debates on» mitigation vs.
adaptation».
The growing focus
on climate
adaptation also has the power to highlight and expand the political climate
debate.
My continued participation in the climate conversation is focused
on attribution,
adaptation and impacts — and the nature of the
debate itself.
Without the IPCC report, a cacophony of national assessments would compete for relevance in
debates about climate change, said Victor, an editor
on next year's IPCC climate change mitigation and
adaptation report.
Sweeping away the
debate over human - made vs. «natural» climate change, and focusing
on adaptation to extreme weather, sounds like it may be the best chance to get some real action.
The arguments raised against such a concern by advocates for geoengineering research often include ones from three groups: first, largely semantic objections to the term «moral hazard»; second, arguments that taking
on more climate risk would be the rational response; and third, claims that experience with the
adaptation debate somehow disproves the effect.
See the
debate on facilitated
adaptation.
Quote of the Day: Tavau Teii
on Adaptation Funding Climate Refugees in Maldives Buy Land GHG Photos: Climate Change Photography Shapes
Debate