Tom Fuller says «I find it truly bizarre that you (or one of the skeptic blogs) has not yet realized that weblogs are the absolutely perfect mechanism for conducting a proper
debate on an issue like climate change
You and you alone can «re-center» our national
debate on issues like the unsustainability of increasing conspicuous per - human over-consumption of limited resources; the unsustainability of skyrocketing absolute global human population numbers; and the soon to become patently unsustainable, seemingly endless growth of large - scale industrial / corporate activities, now threatening to engulf the surface of the planetary home God has blessed us to inhabit and, I suppose, not to overwhelm.
The CCLA has taken on a prominent role in emerging global
debates on issues like illegal government spying and fair trial rights.
Not exact matches
April 6: Facebook says it will require admins of popular pages and advertisers buying political or «
issue» ads
on «
debated topics of national legislative importance»
like education or abortion to verify their identity and location — in an effort to fight disinformation
on its platform.
It is not clear to me at all, even if we do get past the
issues with mining centralization, segregated witness, lightning networks and hard forks, that Bitcoin (or Bitcoin -
like) blockchain - based cryptocurrencies are the way to do it, but I'm open to informed
debate on this point.
But it has been disappointing in that the kind of genetic variation it detects has turned out to explain surprisingly little of the genetic links to most diseases... One
issue of
debate among researchers is whether, despite the prospect of diminishing returns, to continue with the genomewide studies, which cost many millions of dollars apiece, or switch to a new approach
like decoding the entire genomes of individual patients.The unexpected impasse also affects companies that offer personal genomic information and that had assumed they could inform customers of their genetic risk for common diseases, based
on researchers» discoveries...
I'm not trying to sound
like everything is relative, but I am saying these are
issues that have been
debated for thousands of years, and the arguments
on both sides of the coin are really strong.
I would love to see more long, informative
debates like this
on all major
issues.
I suspected I'd get a little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective
on gender, (a position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood» for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy
debate about things
like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul, about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word for deacon, about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11, about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced by our own culture, and about what we really mean when we talk about «biblical womanhood» — all
issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged by complementarian critics.
The CNN
debate opened with discussions
on economic
issues, but later veered toward faith - based matters
like the role of religion in candidates» decision making, abortion, gay marriage — and how the United States ought to treat Muslims living within its borders.
In general, based
on the 2003 interview, it doesn't look
like Santorum knows how to talk or think about this
issue very well; he doesn't, for example, appear to know how to distinguish the three levels of the right to privacy
debate: a) the natural rights level, b) the Constitutional level, and c) the plain - old law level, state and federal.
A political silence
on issues like payday lending has led to a desperate need for other voices in the public
debate - and it's religious ones who are, increasingly, filling the gap.
But he remained a trusted regular in the election
debate spin rooms and TV and radio interviews, solidly defending Tory policies
on tricky
issues like means testing winter fuel payments.
Earlier today, he told the Daily News that he would be «pushing very very hard for
issues like same - sex marriage to not be pre-determined in a smoke - filled room, but to let it air out in full
debate on the Senate floor as soon as possible.»
Nevertheless, the pay raise
issue is now part of the
debate on the campaign trail, especially for candidates who face tough battles
like the one between Niccoli and Amedore.
This is more
like day 330, but the news will nonetheless certainly restoke the passions
on both sides of an
issue that has stirred considerable
debate.
I believe Sen. Perkins,
like I am, is happy to meet the challenge head
on, to have honest and up - front
debates about the
issues and let the voters decide.»
Ball has stated that «since my election victory, we have made extraordinary progress by elevating the
debate on tough
issues like taxes, illegal immigration and dysfunction in Albany.»
During the hour - long
debate Adam Bello and Cheryl Rozzi sparred
on issues like the fees collected by the DMV, and how the situation with passport fees waived by the former county clerk was handled.
The real voice of reason in this race comes instead from left field, from Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins, who has waged a consistently serious race and who
on Wednesday
issued a call for his fellow candidates to stop arguing about sports teams and
debate issues like jobs, health care and climate change.
With several
debates under their belts, Common Council President Carolyn McLaughlin, Councilman Frank Commisso Jr. and Mayor Kathy Sheehan easily rattled off their stances
on issues like vacant buildings, crime and city infrastructure.
De Blasio has complained about disproportionate attention to the charter
debate, at the expense of
issues like teacher retention, and he returned to those «foundational problems»
on Sunday morning.
Today's lead editorial in the Times Union lambasted Cuomo & Astorino for failing to run serious campaigns and praised Howie Hawkins, writing «The real voice of reason in this race comes instead from left field, from Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins, who has waged a consistently serious race and who
on Wednesday
issued a call for his fellow candidates to stop arguing about sports teams and
debate issues like jobs, health care and climate change.»
MPs know what the grassroots are thinking about
issues like last week's EU
debate and
on the other side of the coin we can keep track of how they are voting.
NYT:»... the election followed a fierce, if brief, campaign in which a
debate over same - sex marriage, which Mr. Peralta favors and Mr. Monserrate opposes, often overshadowed discussions
on issues that are vital to many of the largely Hispanic district's working - class and immigrant residents,
like affordable health care and school overcrowding.
One of the most
debated issues related to testosterone replacement therapy is its effects
on cardiovascular risk and clinical events,
like for example heart attack.
If you would
like to suggest another topic, please send it Curated by professional editors, The Conversation offers informed commentary and
debate on the
issues affecting our world.
Have students practice skills they've learned or topics they've come to understand in service learning,
debates, leadership / volunteerism / community service, or by having opinions
on «real»
issues like education reform or the 2012 election (shriek!
He even makes a case for reality shows
like «The Apprentice,» which are discussed
on Internet sites, and
on which difficult ethical
issues might be
debated.
Although prohibition - measures such as those in the case of France were not only regarding Islamic veils but also included every religious dress or sign that was extremely obvious
like Sikh turbans, kippas (Jewish skullcaps) and large Christian crosses (Jones, 2012, p. 22), the public
debate on the
issue across Europe mainly concentrated
on the Islamic attires.
We criticize movies
on A.I.,
like last year's release Ex Machina, we
debate ethical and moral
issues, we challenge them to design and program their own intelligent system.
His aggressive approach politicized nearly all that it touched, leaving in its wake unnecessarily divisive national
debates over
issues like Common Core and sexual harassment
on college campuses.
Centered
on moral dilemmas regarding racism and how to both study and teach sensitivity to the
issue, the conversation — while lively and intellectually challenging — seemed,
like many
debates on morality, only to result in even more possible responses to some of the complexities Minow raised.
Sorry to be the bearer of unpleasant news, but the SOS (Save Our Schools) March
on Washington — an attempt to con the public by diverting the
debate away from real education reform
issues like failing schools, irresponsible spending, retaining bad teachers, etc. — will be setting up their Big Top in Washington D.C. from July 28th to July 31st.
For those among who would have
liked less global and more local in the territorial rights
issue, it's time to put that
debate behind us and work with the new rules that will clearly be predicated
on global editions.
As long as you're willing to exchange your ideas and views about things with the civility that — I'm glad to say — most commentators I've seen have used so far
on this
issue, then your perspective is something we'd
like to know about in our online
debate Wednesday and / or our comments section here
on the column.
we constantly
debate this when do have any
issue with Biggie as I refuse to change her food... my other dog Lenny was haveing all kinds of stomach
issues and skin problems before we got him
on Acana by chance after a lot diffrent dog foods not helping or working... he and BIG's gobble it up and no loose stools or major skin condition (bigs eArs but after web research
like I'm doing now I found a low cost ear solution Zymox Leaded it right up as the bottle said it would) with that being said do u have a preference
on a protein source that might would have prevented the ear problem or itchy feet (again this not major problem) I'd be willing to try it??? This was very long winded I apologize....
Hardcore Pokemaniacs may
debate me
on this
issue, saying tweaks to the metagame
like the split of attacks into physical and special categories or the recent Mega-Evolutions changed the way how people play competitively but at its core, Pokémon's battle system has not changed in over 10 years and it needs a good revision to stay current.
The good news is, franchises
like Dark Souls have opened up arguments that were previously closed, so I think there's room for
debate on these kinds of
issues.
I have been amazed at the level of knowledge and
debate that occur at road side tea shops and noodle shops in India and China
on complex
issues like the economy, fiscal policy, foreign investment and education / job opportunities.
I'd
like to do more pieces
like «Beyond the Eternal Food Fight» and «
Debate Over Climate Risks — Natural or Not,» in which I convene via e-mail a batch of experts
on issues related to sustainable human advancement.
I do enjoy reading the sometimes lively
debate surrounding these
issues, and I certainly prefer a bit of skepticism to things
like a link to a discussion
on Scientific American that I followed recently where they were discussing how the recent temperature record has lead to a lowering of estimates of climate sensitivity.
But among these potential supporters, intense negativity and extreme polarization
on issues like climate reinforce feelings of cynicism and inefficacy while likely adding to the propensity to tune out the
debate.
Issues like the Medieval warm period, different possible causes of climate change (such as solar activity, or even the nature of our climate), studies indicating the last interglacial period was warmer than today, and the failure of recent dire predictions about the climate all show the
debate on climate change is not nearly as settled as many global warming proponents would have us believe.
As a side note, claiming «fabrication» in a nefarious way doesn't help, and generally turns people off to open
debate on the
issue because the process of infilling missing data wasn't designed at the beginning to be have any nefarious motive; it was designed to make the monthly data usable when small data dropouts are seen,
like we discussed in part 1 and showed the B - 91 form with missing data from volunteer data.
And I
like to «know my enemy» for those
debates that come up
on the
issues in «real life»;)
We will certainly never see a long written (or otherwise)
debate between an alarmist
like «Dr.» Mann and a realist
like Steve McIntyre over the
issues, and I disrepair of ever seeing even lesser lights
on each side squaring off in a real
debate.
On the plus side, countries
like Britain now have something
like a «mainstream» politics of climate — mainstream in the sense that the major political parties compete in pledging their commitment to green growth, and the
issue is extensively
debated in the news media.
I agree that many of the
issues I'd
like to discuss do not imply directly climate science and should perhaps be discussed elsewhere, such as the amount of FF reserves, the effect of a tax, the discussion about the benefit - cost of fossils and so
on, but they are nevertheless important in the
debate, and many of you seem to have also some ideas about them.
The legality of file sharing has been hotly
debated in this country for many years, and the
issue boiled over again recently with the Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) trading pot shots in the press with copyright luminaries
like Michael Geist and Howard Knopf over both the legality of the practice and its effect
on the recording industry.