Not exact matches
But in the
debate over a response to global warming, there were blinders
on a lot of Democrats, as well — blinders that resulted for far too long in a one -
solution focus
on a comprehensive, and doomed, cap - and - trade
climate bill.
Jessie Smith Noyes Fdn grant for «General support for an organization working to ensure that low income communities, indigenous groups, and communities of color participate in policy
debates on climate change and food justice issues in Minnesota and the Midwest to achieve
solutions»
In its statement, the Global
Climate Coalition said its reorganization was «part of a long - term initiative to refocus the public debate on climate policy to the issues at hand - namely, a policy contest between the unworkable Kyoto Protocol versus a more pragmatic and viable solution to the climate issue that relies on technology, innovation and American ingenuity.
Climate Coalition said its reorganization was «part of a long - term initiative to refocus the public
debate on climate policy to the issues at hand - namely, a policy contest between the unworkable Kyoto Protocol versus a more pragmatic and viable solution to the climate issue that relies on technology, innovation and American ingenuity.
climate policy to the issues at hand - namely, a policy contest between the unworkable Kyoto Protocol versus a more pragmatic and viable
solution to the
climate issue that relies on technology, innovation and American ingenuity.
climate issue that relies
on technology, innovation and American ingenuity.»
Climate solutions based
on these planet levers could dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions with pragmatic, targeted actions that move beyond old
debates and the current political paralysis.
Despite a thirty - five year
debate on climate change, for the most part, governments, NGOs, organizations, and individuals are ignoring the ethical dimensions of
climate change even though an increased focus
on ethics and justice is needed to move the world to a global
solution to this immense threat.
According to The Guardian, PR firms like Edelman «have played a critical role over the years in framing the
debate on climate change and its
solutions — as well as the extensive disinformation campaigns launched to block those initiatives.»
Curry, who has been invited several times by Republicans to testify at
climate change hearings regarding alleged uncertainties
on manmade
climate change, focused
on how the
climate debate has been politicised and that science has been «caught in the crossfire» leading to «oversimplification» of the problem of and
solutions to
climate change.
If we don't want to screw up our
climate, it is time to put the fruitless
debates on climate - engineering techniques to rest, and focus
on the only real
solution, which is a tremendous challenge requiring all our intellectual resources: The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions.
Annually, the event brings together global leaders from business and government to spur
debate on climate change and to showcase pioneering
solutions for a cleaner, more prosperous future for all.
This matters because the
climate change
debate has been hi - jacked, emissions made worse by the net effects of renewables for a fast lobbyist buck in fact, driven by ignorance and misleading attacks that lump clean low carbon gas with dirty high carbon coal, and old school anti-nuclear activists who oppose nuclear generation
on factualy spurious grounds, while it is in physics and engineering fact by far the best
solution on any measure, through promoting irrational fear unsupported in any area of the facts and proven physics they deceive the unknowing about with simply false or msleading «sience».