Sentences with phrase «debate on particular issues»

Not exact matches

Politicians in particular use these hot button issues to generate a lot of heat and light during speeches and debates, but when their cheering const - ituents go home and the bedroom lights go out, something entirely different must be going on.

The objective of this approach is not to present the religious view on a particular subject, but to generate public discussion and debate about significant issues of the day from many different religious perspectives and viewpoints.

Debate on this issue has been simmering since the late 2000s, gaining particular momentum following the death of Kim Jong Il in 2011.

I agree, however, with one point that's sometimes made on the other side of this particular debate, that our main focus in Parliament should be on issues that affect everyone, straight or gay.

Sunder, One of the problems with the internet debates, especially those around controversial or hotly contested issues, is that the parties very often do not actually appear to engage with each other at all - they merely stand on their own ground shouting to the world about their particular take on a point and fail to actually listen to what others are saying... the classic examples of this is the «debate» about the promotion of women in the European elections and the «debate» about grammar schools - both on Conservative Home.

Yet it is often seen wrongly as a niche, complex and particular issue which has little role in public debate and in recent years has increasingly, around the world, been conducted on narrow and introspective lines.

Back - bench MPs seek adjournment debates in order to raise specific issues and particular concerns with Ministers on the floor of the House.

The RAeS produces discussion and specialist papers to stimulate debate and discussion concerning particular aerospace or aviation matters as well as providing expert analysis and commentary on industry issues through the Aerospace Insight Blog.

In particular, there was significant discussion and debate on the issue of unfunded mandates.

Although the Netherlands have a good track record in using innovative means to engage the general public in the science and technology debate — Van der Starre mentions the use of citizen panels, in which a diverse group of citizens gathers evidence and develops a statement on a particular scientific development or issue — both Schutter and Van der Starre think PCST can be improved.

You have in your packet a blue sheet that gives you the order of the day, so I won't belabor that too much, but I will just remind you that we're going to start out with a session on history this morning; then go to a lunchtime segment that will focus on some of the relevant federal constitutional issues, including evaluations of the federal attacks on and defenses of the Blaine amendments; then we will finish off the day with a session that will focus on litigation strategy related to these amendments and some of the arguments being made for and against them in that litigation, as well as a focus on how debates over faith - based initiatives and school vouchers are affected by these particular state constitutional restrictions.

Lots of issues aren't «scientificly orderly» (which I put in quotes because we have yet to define what that actually means) in some specific region on this planet, that doesn't mean heads or tails about this particular debate in general.

Every journalist has likely experienced this effect in covering the climate change debate or other intensely polarized debates, as a particular story is harshly criticized by commenters, phone callers, or letter writers from both tail ends of the spectrum of views on the issue.

I am actually old enough to remember the flouride debate, and I would not need to discuss this particular issue with my dentist, but, I do take L ****** (a anti-cholesterol) on my doctor's advice, and I did ask questions of both my doctor and my pharmacist and did my own research before beginning the treatment.

I have disagreed with the Innovation Alliance on FRAND issues, but today it issued a press release relating to U.S. patent reform that I believe raises some legitimate concern over one particular aspects of the current patent policy debate.