Humane Canada supports stringent regulatory controls over genetic engineering of animals and continues to promote knowledgeable international
debate on this issue by government, industry, the animal welfare movement and the public.
That post also links to previous
debate on the issue by Appleman and Solove.
Not exact matches
A paper co-authored
by University of Ottawa Professor Michael Wolfson, one of Canada's top researchers
on income and equality
issues, said there was much
debate of Ottawa's new program this year allowing some income splitting for couples with children, but most people don't realize income splitting has long existed for thousands of professionals such as doctors and lawyers who have been able to funnel their incomes through private companies they create to hold their income.
While
debate moderators and election commentators focus
on economic
issues, the religious rhetoric of the presidential candidates appears to go mostly unnoticed - except
by the key Republican voting bloc being courted.
The imbroglio reached its apex during the second Republican presidential
debate, when Carly Fiorina decried the harvesting of a brain from an intact, extracted fetus whose heart had restarted — described
on camera
by a former tissue procurement technician — as an
issue that defines «the character of our nation.»
This
issue was tackled head -
on by Paige Patterson and Al Mohler, two Southern Baptist educators, in a public
debate at this year's convention.
And then, all the
debate is corrupted already from the start
by this wrong take
on the
issue.
I suspected I'd get a little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective
on gender, (a position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood» for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy
debate about things like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul, about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word for deacon, about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11, about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced
by our own culture, and about what we really mean when we talk about «biblical womanhood» — all
issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged
by complementarian critics.
John Cobb,
on the other hand, denies that «Whitehead without God» has coherency, at least as presented
by Sherburne, and the two Whiteheadians carry out their
debate in
issues of this journal (PS 1:91 - 113, 2:277 - 95, 3:27 - 40).
Though Calvin and Servetus had
debated these
issues by letter for many years, they had never met in person, yet when Servetus stopped in Geneva
on his way to Italy, he was recognized and arrested.
Global science,
by the way, is not unified and spends most of its time bickering back
on forth over every
issue, not to advance
debate, but to justify academic publishing requirements.
After all, if all these smarter - than - me theologians, theorists, academics, scholars, thinkers, and leaders
on both sides of the
issue haven't been able to put the
debate to rest, what chance does a slim yellow book
by a happy - clappy Canadian mama - writer have?
In a
debate with an advocate for abortion, one occasionally comes up against an informed opponent who seeks to undermine the Church's position
on the
issue by pointing out that the Universal Doctor of the Church, St Thomas Aquinas, held to the doctrine of delayed animation or hominisation.
@tallulah13 The Greek gods were made in the image of men
by men, some, Hercules for example was a man.The living God made man in His image.You choose, but if you continue to avoid honest
debate I'll quit replying to you.There are many examples of proven Bible truths, the Greek b.s you brought up just confuses the real
issue and adds nothing to the conversation.You know it, I know it, so does any thinking person.Focus
on the topic at hand or go elsewhere.
Harrison also unfolds Augustine's insightful contribution to the science — religion
debate, drawing out a number of valuable principles — not least, recommending restraint where
issues are not clear, and avoiding bringing Christianity into contempt
by arguing for false scientific opinions
on the supposed grounds of scriptural warrant.
To describe the Church as a community of memory and hope, sharing in the common memory not only of Jesus Christ but also of the mighty deeds of God known
by Israel, expecting the coming into full view of the kingdom
on earth and / or in heaven; to describe it further as the community of worship, united
by its direction toward one God, who is Father, Son and Holy Spirit yet worshipped more as Father or as Son or as Holy Spirit in this or that part of the community; to describe it as a community of thought in which
debate and conflict can take place because there is a fundamental frame of agreement and because there are common
issues of great import — to do all this and the much more that needs to be done would be to essay the work of a large part of theology.
Instead of working to achieve consensus
on contested theological and moral
issues, legislatively driven agendas are designed to end
debates by reducing the
issue to two sides and then enacting one side into church policy and ecclesiastical law.
So when we
debate an «
issue» and forget that it is backed
by people — imperfect, wounded, beloved people
on both sides — we dehumanize each other.
Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe supported the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank
by citing Genesis and calling the
debate on the
issue «not a political battle at all.
It seems, moreover,
on the basis of public opinion polls, that this challenge is already accepted
by a majority of our fellow citizens and thus the question of its establishment as a matter of law has not provoked a
debate worthy of the momentous
issues at stake.
One of the major criticism leveled at Arsenal and Arsene Wenger's transfer policy
on Monday night
by Gary Neville was the same
issue that a vast majority of us fans have been left frustrated
by for many years, namely the Defensive Midfield
debate.
In a recent book
by Dr. Peter Cook (Mothering Denied) describes better than most others the difficulties that Dr. Jay Belsky has had convincing his fellow scientists that social ideology is passing for, if not dictating, scientific interpretations of studies
on this
issue (as is true for the bedsharing
debate), in favor of dismissing the serious concerns and negative developmental correlates of infants and children being placed for long hours, early in their lives, in daycare centers.
When pressed
by reporters about the lack of public
debate on the
issue, Silver fired back, suggesting there has been more pulic
debate over the millionaire's tax than ever before.
Laurie Penny pits here finger
on a live
issue the hierachy and class nature of the way Labour is run.I would add the total lack of internal Labour Party
debate Labours record in Govt was apalling Privatisation and privatisation of the NHS backed
by Labours ministers as well as War etc mean I do nt consider you a party of the Left.
No doubt, there should be a thorough parliamentary
debate on the
issue, but instead of forcing a decision in this parliament, which could well be as controversial and divisive as the ill - fated referendum, I strongly agree with Nick Clegg that
by far the best and most dignified way out of the current mess would be to ask the people in the proper constitutional way
by calling an snap general election:
On the one hand, UKIP's appeal was itself facilitated
by the complicity of Conservative and Labour leaders in downplaying the
issue in the domestic political
debate.
Not only that, but this
issue should be one of the major policy questions that need to be put to all the candidates in the upcoming Labour leadership
debate (as I have already pointed out
on this site) as requested
by Sunder (see What are the difficult questions the leadership candidates need to answer?).
At the same time, though, diplomacy is getting weaker because of austerity, because of Iraq and Afghanistan, because of a sort of inward - ness in Europe — look at the Brexit
debate — and there's a retreat generally from world leadership
on lots of
issues by the leading power.
The conference «Fuel Poverty: Our Vision for the Future» is supported
by National Grid and Northern Powergrid and will focus
on six key vision statements exploring the wider
issues of fuel poverty including; energy efficiency programmes, fuel poverty and health, the heat or eat
debate, hard to treat properties, energy behaviour and a fairer energy market.
Eventually those patents were sold to an affiliate of Liberty Media for a hefty sum, allowing Samuels to use his windfall to run for office, flirt with running for office, and help shape the
debate from the left
by speaking out
on issues and challenging candidates to adopt policies he advocates for.
Two best political books I read this were «Nixonland»
by Rich Perlstein (which covers the eclipse of American liberalism and rise of conservatism between 1964 - 1972) and «The Persistence of Poverty»
by Charles Karelis, which is short, witty and will change the way that you think about the whole
debate around welfare and poverty
issues (get»em
on Amazon if they aren't in the shops).
Westminster Hall
debate on the serious
issues raised
by «Proving Torture», with a number of MPs
on all sides joining our call for torture survivors to get the help they need.
Today's
debate will be followed
by a free vote, meaning the Tories are not technically being whipped
on the
issue.
Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders squared off in a fiery Brooklyn
debate sponsored
by CNN and Time Warner Cable News, sparring
on issues ranging from Wall Street to Israel.
Labour backbenchers
on the procedure committee aren't impressed
by Hague's unexpected last - minute motion, produced yesterday evening, for a one - hour
debate on the
issue later today.
At the
debate on the
issue I attended, most of the panellists and delegates were almost entirely dismissive of the problem of antisemitism, with several suggesting that it didn't even exist in any real way within the movement and others suggesting the whole
issue had been fabricated out of thin air
by Labour MPs and the right wing press.
There is a good discussion of the wider
issues raised
by Chris Grayling's responses during that
debate by Mark Elliot
on the Public Law for Everyone blog.
The People's Forum - Ghana has taken cognisance of the call
by HE the President to engage the Flagbearer of the New Patriotic Party, Hon Nana Addo Dankwah Akufo Addo in a
debate on issues and facts about the economy and we wish to take up the task of making this unprecedented battle of facts a reality.
The presidential hopefuls, Ms Samia Yaaba Nkrumah, former Chairperson of the party and daughter of Ghana's first President Dr Kwame Nkrumah, Mr Ivor Kobina Greenstreet, a former General Secretary of the party, Mr Bright Oblitei Akwetey, who has twice contested for the flag - bearer position, and Mr Agyapong, a businessman, were quizzed
by the moderator, Prof. Kwame Karikari,
on issues on the Ghanaian economy, industrialisation, agriculture and health in the country's first - ever inter-party presidential
debate sponsored
by TV Africa.
By lumping the Farm Bill into the sequester
debate, the news media is denying Americans an understanding, and a
debate,
on a separate, and equally important,
issue.
I based my views
on a Telegraph article last year
by Greg Rosen, which extracted from the 6 day Commons
debate in October 1971, and the nature of sovereignty at stake clearly comes through as a topic of
debate, with speeches
by Waddington, Enoch Powell, Heath etc, all focused
on that
issue.
It was always more likely that this measure could face more difficulty in the Lords (given the opposition of some Bishops in the earlier
debates, which has been challenged
by their colleagues more recently; and the traditionalist right arguments of Tebbit / Waddington
on equality
issues generally usually have somewhat more support in the Lords than the Commons)
On 12 June 2008, Davis resigned from the Shadow Cabinet and announced his resignation as an MP, in order to force a by - election, and cause a wider debate on the single issue of what he believed to be the erosion of civil libertie
On 12 June 2008, Davis resigned from the Shadow Cabinet and announced his resignation as an MP, in order to force a
by - election, and cause a wider
debate on the single issue of what he believed to be the erosion of civil libertie
on the single
issue of what he believed to be the erosion of civil liberties.
The three Democrats vying to take
on freshman Republican Rep. John Katko in NY - 24 — Colleen Deacon, Steve Williams and Eric Kingson — staked out similar positions
on key
issues last night in their first televised
debate of the campaign hosted
by TWC News.
In a video released
by his campaign this morning, Astorino accused Cuomo of «playing games»
on the
debate issue by not agreeing to a one -
on - one televised
debate.
At a Parliamentary
debate on government procurement and manufacturing this week, organised
by the Associate Parliamentary Manufacturing Group, a number of
issues were identified as barriers to greater use.
Each candidate answered a bevy of questions
on issues pertinent to District 19, which covers Bayside, Little Neck, Douglaston, College Point, East Flushing, Malba and Whitestone, during the
debate hosted Friday
by TimesLedger at Flushing Library.
Shadow education secretary Andy Burnham insisted it was «a huge change in tone» following a
debate on the
issue in Parliament
on Tuesday evening, in which the plans were repeatedly attacked
by Labour MPs.
The Prime Minister has called the blacklisting of workers
by large construction firms «completely unacceptable» ahead of a Labour Opposition Day
debate on the
issue.
The contrived nature of the system is even more abundantly clear when it comes to the discriminatory burdens placed
on the nation's minor parties and independent candidates, whether the
issue is unfair ballot access laws or the arbitrary and exclusionary 15 percent polling threshold imposed
by the Commission
on Presidential
Debates (CPD) on the Libertarian Party's Gary Johnson and Jill Stein of the Greens — or any other third - party presidential candidate, for that matter — to appear in the nationally - televised debates this
Debates (CPD)
on the Libertarian Party's Gary Johnson and Jill Stein of the Greens — or any other third - party presidential candidate, for that matter — to appear in the nationally - televised
debates this
debates this autumn.