Sentences with phrase «debate on why»

• In this statement, John Singer, the chairperson of NACCHO, calls for «Community leaders across the states and territories to lead a national inclusive discussion and debate on why we need to change and nominate a new day for modern Australia to truly celebrate our diversity».

The debate on why the skills section is so important can perhaps go on and on... Read More»

Let's debate on why fingerprint sensor should be on all smartphones later.

For long, there has been a debate on why Indian insurance sector is hesitant in offering comprehensive coverage to individuals with disabilities.

Sandberg has made an important contribution to the debate on why we see so few women in positions of authority.

Cory and Basher have a debate on why Battlefield 4 is so close to becoming the next great shooter, but it is the little things holding it back.

(Though, truthfully, I'd prefer some more impassioned debate on why your locale deserves the country's attention than empty screams and yells.

The debate on why there are so few women in the field of science and technology rages on, but Google...

@Dr: I didn't debate that S&G were destroyed, what I'm debated on WHY it was destroyed.

I enjoy hanging out with my friends playing Star Wars pen - and - paper games (double - whammy there), I'm more than happy to talk Tekken 6 framerates and have heated debates on why Twilight is ruining everything that's great about vampires.

Not exact matches

Turn on any news channel, and you'll hear debate about why so many pollsters and pundits failed to foresee Donald Trump's victory.

Economists can debate precisely why so many people have taken it in the teeth in recent decades, but it's clear that years of stagnant or dropping incomes have taken a toll on their ability to get ahead.

If copies of the book start to appear in the Justice Department and on law school syllabi, Eisinger could spark important debate about why — at a time when so many people struggle to obtain basic procedural rights in the criminal justice system — white - collar defendants manage to consistently evade its grasp.

«One can only assume that the Facebook executives were unwilling or certainly reluctant to engage in an interview or a debate about why these images are available on the Facebook site.»

It seems bizarre that the most reasonable understanding of why the 2008 bank crisis did not require a vast public subsidy for Wall Street occurred at Monday's Republican presidential debate on June 13, by none other than Congressional Tea Party leader Michele Bachmann — who had boasted in a Wall Street Journal interview two days earlier, on Saturday, that she voted against the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) «both times.»

Why not start the debate in the 2014 budget and keep the claim of «sound» economic management on the front burner for the next 12 months?

But why would he know — he can not comprehend the accumalation of the texts and history after them on the debate of Torahnic law... which Jesus himself participated in (this banter back n forth on what the Torah means in certain sections — or interpretation of how the law is used in daily life).

I merely commented on why debates such as these are important.

While everyone is debating over someones hurt feelings, the entire economy is in meltdown, soldiers are spilling blood on foreign soil in a war that no one can remember why we are there, we now have a government that is destroying practically everything this once great nation stood for.

It is what has lead me to my veiw that Atheism as a religion, the passion most Atheist have for their point of view from the start you may not fall in this category but I'm sure you know someone that does.The same applies to Christians that freak out on someone and start forcing their view on others, I see that as wrong also if someone asks or brings the debate to you then by all means debate but why be rude how does it help?

Thats why anger shouldn't be our default, especially when it comes to trivial arguments on social media and debates about news stories that don't even effect us directly.

The main plenary speakers from America, Cornel West, Barbara Ehrenrich, and Robert Reich reinforce the ideological direction of the conference, and conservatives might ask why the organizers couldn't find a figure on the Right to balance out the opinions and promote real debate.

Legal representatives for Sheffield University told a High Court judge on Tuesday that Felix Ngole showed no understanding about why his views - made during a debate online - were «problematic».

Why must there be so many damn trolls on these sites — does the atheist v theist debate never evolve past name calling and straw - man arguments...?

Why wouldn't Rick Santorum keep the ashes on until the debate tonight?

This is the reason why we think that the debate on globalisation should not only be a debate on economic neo-colonialism but also on the different political aspects of globalisation.

And further, ask yourself why we should have to rely on very stale, thousands - of - years - old, many - versioned old text, that is only reasonably subject to debates over its meaning.

I hope, nevertheless, that my comments may indicate why one person at least on this side of the Atlantic (and hence somewhat isolated from the technical expertise, vocabulary, and sometimes apparently frenetic debates of the community of process thinkers) finds in Hartshorne's work «genuine philosophic wisdom,» especially as it develops insights into the logical status and conceptual structure of a theistic understanding of the concept of God.

Also ask yourself, regarding the text that we clearly disagree about, why we should have to rely on very stale, thousands - of - years - old, multiply - translated and re-transcribed old text, that is only reasonably subject to debates over its meaning.

In light of the debate on whether Syrian refugees should be welcome in the United States and why Christians compose less than 3 percent of those resettled so far, here's a look at where America's current Christian refugees have come from.

I have a feeling that the evolution debate might be our generation's Galilean controversy, which is why I am wary of making sweeping pronouncements about God being on one side or the other.

On naturalistic principles, there's no explanation for why a debate is more important than the two soda bottles fizzing.

Then why did Ms. Kelly have three guests on air to debate the issue?

This is why theologians today can still illustrate important features of the Good News by looking at Paul's teaching on circumcision, even though there is no live debate among Christians about whether it is necessary for salvation anymore.

A group of people unite with the same beliefs, outreach to the community to convert others to atheism, and debate with other religions on why they are right... Sounds like a religion to me.

Even in Middle - eastern culture, there are still many white people, so although it is unlikely for him to have appeared as a «white person», it's still not improbable, it does however contradict the cynic principles in Christianity, as they define him by what they believe would constitute their creator as being great or perfect as a manifestation equal to his greatness, but this was the exact mistake the Jews made, and why they disregarded Jesus when he came in the Flesh, his appearance can be debated on, but just like his birthday, or day of death.

Why doesn't he debate a Christian on the opposite side of the subject and lets see who wins that one.

Why are you trolling for a debate on the merits of religion?

Why, Anderson Cooper, are you always behind the other countries and how can you support this on - going debate.

For example, Charles Krauthammer muses on why evangelicals prefer Trump and in the debate last night Megyn Kelly referenced a close association between Trump and evangelical voters.

In a memo about the debates distributed to campaign surrogates and provided to CNN on Thursday, longtime Romney adviser Beth Myers outlines a series of reasons why the president is likely to emerge as the winner of the first debate.»

Why not be the first to send us your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

That's why the public policy debate has largely moved on from taxes and bans.

We then proceed into a five minute debate that none of the Chinese restaurants around here are truly authentic anyways, so why don't we just pick the best and move on?

I wish to debate why Me has put a point of debate on to a debating website stating that there is no point in going onto a debating website with a debate

Former Man Utd defender Rio Ferdinand has waded in on the Paul Pogba debate, and has put forward his opinion on why he's struggling.

Don't want to kick off the whole «Cesc back to Arsenal debate» but there are clues in the above as to why on balance we decided not to take him back.

I thought people here were debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.

In turn, as debate continues to rage on over Mane's red and subsequent three - match ban after his high boot on Man City goalkeeper Ederson, the lack of consistency if anything has certainly riled Liverpool fans who can't understand why their man was the only one to be punished significantly.

First let me laugh hahahahaha.Secondly, let me give credit where it is due and say that that was a great finish from Giroud.Thirdly, do you know that if Giroud did not score today he would have been criticized very badly you know why because he does a lot of things wrongly when he does not score but when he scores everyone just ignores.How many people were actually focused on him after he scored you would realize that he breaks up a lot of attacks.Its a pity peeps are not being honest about him he is French and he is a very nice guy so i understand however.Lastly, it has been about 3 seasons or so that he has been here and people are still debating over him.Make up your mind i made mine up from day one that he arrived and realized he was awful however great classy goal.