There is a chance that the ABC could move towards «balance» in their reporting, most likely forced by
a debate over coal usage.
Not exact matches
When
coal - fired power plants close communities can face painful transitions, and the
debate over one Massachusetts facility shows the local impacts of a national shift to cleaner power
The findings, reported today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, add to a burgeoning
debate over the climate impact of replacing oil - and
coal - fired power plants with those fuelled by natural gas.
Recently, the government, headed by Prime Minister Tony Abbott, triggered a public
debate over plans to construct potentially the world's largest
coal port adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef, a UNESCO World Heritage Area, and to excise 74,000 hectares of forest from Tasmania's World Heritage — listed site.
It is a sign of the times that the public
debate among major players
over Oregon's
coal - free future saw little contention regarding the reality of climate change and focused mostly on the best way to address it.
But worldwide emissions have continued to swell, driven mainly by blistering economic growth and
coal burning in Asia;
debate over a new climate treaty has stalled; lawmakers of both parties have not embraced legislation aimed at cutting emissions; and polls show the public still largely disengaged.
He now finds himself at the center of the
debate over America's
coal future.
You avoid
debating the issues (such as nuclear replacement for
coal in electricity generation across the world would avoid
over a million of fatalities per year by 2050).
This strategy could help policy makers overcome a fundamental conflict in the
debate over global warming: carbon dioxide, the main heat - trapping gas in the air, is an unavoidable byproduct of burning fossil fuels like
coal and oil — and combustion of fossil fuels is the foundation of industrial societies.
In the coming months, as Congress and the Obama administration dole out billions in stimulus dollars to kick - start a green economy and draft sweeping legislation to curb climate change, the future of
coal will be at the heart of the
debate over energy policy.
The
debate over global warming has created predictable adversaries, pitting environmentalists against industry and
coal - state Democrats against coastal liberals.
(Editor's Note: Another repost at a time when we need to remind people of how McGuinty has destroyed rural Ontario) Whenever I get into a
debate with someone
over wind turbines, they always haul out that old dated nugget about
coal plants.
Thanks to the lobbying work of the
coal and oil companies, and the vast army of thinktanks, PR consultants and astroturfers they have sponsored, thanks too to the domination of the airwaves by loony right shock jocks, the
debate over issues like this has become so mad that any progress at all is little short of a miracle.
As hearings begin this afternoon on landmark climate change legislation, the
debate will bear the mark of an unprecedented corporate campaign
over the past year to preserve
coal's role in the nation's energy future.