Bringing evidence and systems thinking to
the debate over fossil fuel production, the renewable energy transition, and the role of energy in modern life.
'' As he sees it, there are three groups with a common cause in
the debate over fossil fuels and they are wasting time arguing unnecessarily with one another.
Not exact matches
Over the past legislative session, the issue of divesting state pension funds of
fossil fuel investments received considerable
debate both in the State House and around Vermont.
Yet at this forum, an on - campus
debate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
over whether the university should divest the
fossil fuel holdings within its $ 11 billion endowment, might not have happened if market forces properly priced the economic and environmental costs of climate change, a theme that Anthony Cortese, the event moderator, alluded to at the outset.
There is no real
debate in the peer - reviewed scientific literature
over the fact that the unusual, accelerating global warming seen since the 19th Century is attributable to the increase of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide, in the atmosphere due to burning
fossil fuels.
Another gem is mentioning that not a word has come up in the presidential
debates about global warming and in the last
debate Romney and Obama were competing
over who could increase domestic
fossil fuel production faster and cheaper.
This strategy could help policy makers overcome a fundamental conflict in the
debate over global warming: carbon dioxide, the main heat - trapping gas in the air, is an unavoidable byproduct of burning
fossil fuels like coal and oil — and combustion of
fossil fuels is the foundation of industrial societies.
In fact there is a massive
debate over the main issue, which is what effect on climate will an increase in CO2 caused by burning
fossil fuels have.
While there is overwhelming scientific consensus that heat - trapping gases released by burning
fossil fuels are warming the planet (in particular at the poles), the
debate shows there is still a fracas
over the finer ways in which Earth's climate will change.
The
debate over global warming centers on the extent to which gases released from the burning of
fossil fuels — mainly carbon dioxide — are trapping the sun's heat in the Earth's atmosphere, creating a greenhouse effect.
Over the course of 2 1/2 days, 150 participants from over 40 countries listened and debated on issues in renewables, ranging from fossil fuel subsidies, to the impact of the media and public relations, and vision for the next decade of renewab
Over the course of 2 1/2 days, 150 participants from
over 40 countries listened and debated on issues in renewables, ranging from fossil fuel subsidies, to the impact of the media and public relations, and vision for the next decade of renewab
over 40 countries listened and
debated on issues in renewables, ranging from
fossil fuel subsidies, to the impact of the media and public relations, and vision for the next decade of renewables.
He called his proposal «a kissing cousin» of a carbon tax because it would effectively put a price on
fossil fuel burning while sidestepping the «
debate»
over whether CO2 emissions are causing global warming.
It is true that
fossil fuel interests have had a generally toxic effect on the
debate over climate change in the US, corrupting the Republican party in particular into a reckless refusal to acknowledge climate science and its implications.