Sentences with phrase «debate over global warming»

Or continuing the adventure by listening to a panel of distinguished scientists who question the hypothesis at the root of the global debate over global warming?

To those who object that this will create a «chilling effect» on scientific debate over global warming, which is the obvious goal of the investigation, Bill Nye says that's just fine.

And although Curbelo has not endorsed a policy by which to reduce carbon emissions, some observers describe his openness to the issue as a thawing moment in the seemingly frozen congressional debate over global warming.

The battle in Virginia is a microcosm of the national debate over global warming.

By focusing on the consequences of climate change rather than its scientific causes, some experts suggest that Mr. Nash succeeded in circumventing a divisive political debate over global warming and the extent to which human activity contributes to it.

But it is the dangers of these unknowable risks from future warming that should weigh heaviest, in the ongoing debate over global warming and climate change.

Given the stakes in the current debate over global warming, the research may very well turn out to be one of the most important climate experiments of our time — if only the media would report the story.

A climate researcher for decades, he had long been in the midst of political and scientific debates over global warming, tirelessly urging political leaders and the public to take action now to avoid disasters such as rising sea levels in the future.

I guess it's like the debate over global warming.

Much like the debate over global warming, these non-believers refuse to validate an unassailable fact: standardized testing does have positive — and predictive — value in education and in life, just as the Earth is, indeed, getting warmer.

He chuckles when it's compared to the similarly sealed — at least in most scientists» minds — debate over global warming.

Finally, Bryan Walsh at Time posted «A Silent Hurricane Season Adds Fuel to a Debate Over Global Warming,» which echoes Mooney's piece.

For those old enough to remember, the debate over global warming may be reminiscent of the equally intense scare propaganda lasting for several years during the 1980s.

[UPDATED 4/6, 3:00 p.m.:] I just read the piece, «A Shift in the Debate Over Global Warming,» which focused on technological innovation with respect to climate change.

The book produced by Heartland states, «Probably the most widely repeated claim in the debate over global warming is that» 97 % of scientists agree» that climate change is man - made and dangerous.

This strategy could help policy makers overcome a fundamental conflict in the debate over global warming: carbon dioxide, the main heat - trapping gas in the air, is an unavoidable byproduct of burning fossil fuels like coal and oil — and combustion of fossil fuels is the foundation of industrial societies.

According to a NY Times article dated Jan. 1, 2007, some scientists are adopting a middle ground in the debate over global warming.

The debate over global warming has created predictable adversaries, pitting environmentalists against industry and coal - state Democrats against coastal liberals.

Robinson Meyer's November 15 article for The Atlantic, titled «Democrats Are Shockingly Unprepared to Fight Climate Change,» is an important article because it accurately reports some of the history of the debate over global warming in the United States.

Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, the ranking Republican member of the Environment and Public Works committee, told The Daily Caller on Monday that climate change skeptics have won the debate over global warming on Capitol Hill.

Lindzen's first paragraph: «Judging from the media in recent months, the debate over global warming is now over.

The debate over global warming centers on the extent to which gases released from the burning of fossil fuels — mainly carbon dioxide — are trapping the sun's heat in the Earth's atmosphere, creating a greenhouse effect.

The phrase «the debate over global warming is now over» does not mean that there is no more to learn scientifically, as Lindzen's comment suggests, but that theoretical analyses combined with observational evidence have together produced a broad scientific consensus that human activities have become the primary factor influencing the global climate.

The Climate Change Awards were started as a way to recognize individuals of extraordinary ability and unflagging commitment to restoring sound science and common sense to the debate over global warming.

That brings me to the latest scandal to emerge from the debate over global warming.

As I said on the Senate floor on July 28, 2003, «much of the debate over global warming is predicated on fear, rather than science.»