The debate over interest rates has been raging for some time now, but that doesn't mean they have to move higher.
Not exact matches
A
debate has lingered for years
over whether the Fed ought to use economic benchmarks as triggers for
interest rate hikes and other actions.
Despite disappointing job growth last month, the unemployment
rate fell to its lowest level since early 2008, sharpening the
debate within the Federal Reserve
over whether to raise
interest rates when policy makers meet in two weeks.
There is continued
debate over the raising of
interest rates as a prescription for overheated financial markets.
In a discussion chaired by HVS chairman Russell Kett involving senior executives from Starwood Capital, Precis Holdings, citizenM and London & Regional Properties, the panel
debated how it is leisure rather than corporate demand that is currently of more
interest to hoteliers, as corporate
rates have been relatively static
over recent years.
That's why I find it hilarious whenever I see people
debating on hardwarezone
over which account has a better
interest rate.
But if you look at
interest rates right now, you're
debating over a per cent.
We all know about the financial hardship recent grads are facing, and we know about the
debates in Congress
over student loan
interest rates.
That is why the current
debate over the very nature of the risk - free
rate is so
interesting.
The problem is that the
debate over the Fed and
interest rates became political.
And if you can make a career of being consistently contrary, you can aspire to be like Jim Grant, publisher of the Grant's
Interest Rate Observer newsletter of stock - picking and monetary policy, who hosted Bogle, amid a conference of Grant fans, in an ornate ballroom at New York's Plaza last week, for a «Great
Debate»
over how best to manage other people's money.
The on going
debate over paying off the mortgage with low
interest rate over the span of 15 - 30 years (30 years in my case) vs investing in the market is a hot
debate.