In a relatively short period of time,
the debate over patent reform has transformed an arcane, low - salience issue into one that sparks fierce controversy and national headlines.
Not exact matches
Debate over whether genetically altered animals can be
patented in Europe took a new turn last week after the European
Patent Office published its patent for the Harvard «onco - mouse&r
Patent Office published its
patent for the Harvard «onco - mouse&r
patent for the Harvard «onco - mouse».
I guess it was just a coincidence that I added two Saint Laurent pieces to my wardrobe
over the past two weeks, lace up
patent boots (that I have been going back and fourth on for a year now, can't believe I ever
debated this because they're already getting re-heeled because I've worn them every day), and the new Nico Satchel.
Used ebooks are a hot topic right now, with Apple and Amazon each pursuing a
patent over reselling digital content and as a result sparking a
debate on the legality, ethics, and morality of a second - hand marketplace for products that don't decay.
I have disagreed with the Innovation Alliance on FRAND issues, but today it issued a press release relating to U.S.
patent reform that I believe raises some legitimate concern
over one particular aspects of the current
patent policy
debate.
A bill being
debated by the Senate Judiciary Committee that would transfer jurisdiction
over appeals of deportation orders from the regional court of appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ignited cries of protests from
patent lawyers.»
The past couple of weeks have offered an amazing ringside view of an unusually public and acrimonious
debate over software
patents.
Published by
patent analytics firm Lex Machina, the report adds new grist to a
debate over U.S. innovation policy at a time when
patent reform in Congress has foundered once again.
Little of this will come as a surprise to those who have followed the
debate over U.S.
patent policy in recent years, which has seen Congress propose multiple measures to curb the role of
patent trolls, but deliver no new laws since 2011.
Setting aside the legal issues, and the
debate over whether such
patents are a good or bad thing for innovation, consider this point of view by Mike Masnick of Techdirt:
The investment decisions by four technology companies come in the midst of a heated
debate over whether it is too easy for
patent owners to extract large royalty payments, and whether
patent buying firms spur or stifle innovation.