Although the national
debate over public education has become polarized during the past several years, with bitter divisions inside and between political parties, the PDK / Gallup poll showed a surprising level of agreement in the public at large.
Charter schools remain among the most controversial and divisive subjects in the national
debate over public education.
But the staid event quickly turned dramatic when a busload of angry residents followed Anderson from Newark in a display of the slugfest politics that have infused
debate over public education across the country.
Not exact matches
With little new
education policy expected in the remainder of NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio's first term — and a quiet session on
education concluding in Albany — the
debate over traditional
public schools versus charter schools has shifted to a new battleground: school safety.
Although there appears to be no short - term answer to the tuition
debate, the time is nonetheless ripe for universities, students, the
public, and politicians to engage in discussions
over the state of higher
education in Ontario and the direction it should take, particularly with respect to accessibility.
As the
debate over school choice heats up once again, in the halls of Congress and in many state capitals, a favorite gambit of defenders of the status quo is to damn such changes as «sure to undermine
public education» or «bad for the
public schools.»
Even as
public support for charter schooling has steadily increased
over time (according to the 2015
Education Next poll the
public supported charters by 47 % to 19 %), the media is filled with one charged charter
debate after another.
My hope is that this exercise helps spur conversation about which university - based academics are contributing most substantially to
public debates over education and ed policy, and how they do so.
In exploring these issues, the author engages deeply in
public policy
debates over separate versus mixed
education, legislative interpretation, and social integration.
Debates over the relative virtues of
public and nonpublic schools often imply that private
education in the United States is a homogeneous world.
We know that early childhood
education is a good thing, but even with growing enrollments and
public investment,
debate periodically erupts about the specific benefits of early
education and whether those benefits last or fade away
over time.
A fierce
debate over civic
education in America's
public schools has erupted in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
Michael Feuer, dean of The George Washington University Graduate School of
Education and Human Development, suggested the dip in confidence among PDK / Gallup poll respondents might reflect the influence of recent
public debates over whether college is worth the money.
If we are ever to restore local control and
public accountability to America's
education system, the College Board's recent power grab must be a central component of the
debate over Common Core.
The report strengthens the positions of teachers in Chicago should they vote to strike, should be considered in deliberations
over the Friedrichs case, and must help shape ongoing
debates about the importance of unions in the nation's
public education system.
For school - board leaders and others charged with implementing those man - dates at the district level, the legislative activism has renewed an old
debate over the governance of
public education and the degree to which the tradition of «local control» is being eroded.
As the discussion and
debate over next year's Boston
Public Schools budget begins, the Boston
Education Justice Alliance is fighting for the schools our communities deserve.
Cami Anderson, the superintendent of the Newark
public school system who became a lightning rod in the
debate over education reform in New Jersey and nationally, resigned on Monday, eight months before her contract was to expire.
I am saddened that my efforts researching and negotiating the work of
public education seem meaningless in the face of current policy
debates — and that last year's nationwide struggle
over teacher tenure or this week's «
debates»
over teacher evaluation in New York arrive forcefully, demanding immediate reaction rather than initiative from educators.
In
debates over how much funding is needed to achieve certain outcomes, it has become increasingly apparent to some state leaders that the issue is mostly about how much money lawmakers are willing to invest in
public education.
It's not like it is difficult to find startling hypocrisy in what passes for
public policy
debates these days, but the battle
over public education seems especially rife with maddening examples, most of them around the notion of accountability, that teachers and schools should be held to high standards and measurable results for the
public dollars they use.
The laws have become part of a broader
debate over the proliferation of charter schools, private school vouchers and everything else now dubbed «
education reform,» a vague term used by self - professed reformers to describe nearly any attempts that call for challenging the traditional
public school system.
Few
education policy battles have burned as hot as
debate over the practice of requiring traditional
public schools to share under - used space with charter schools.
Over the past several months, Mississippi has had a rigorous
debate about
public education, including appropriate levels of state spending and who should be making those decisions.
Parent advocates from across the country converged on New York City on Monday, February 7 for the first national forum of Parents Across America, a parent - led movement to make parent voices heard in the national
debate over education reform — and to promote positive, common - sense solutions that will improve
public schools nationwide.
As
debate continues
over an
education reform model for Nashville's
public schools, two local groups have teamed up to offer an event that will highlight the reform experience of the Recovery School District in New Orleans.
Changed votes by two Board members
over the approval of two Aspire charter schools at this week's Board meeting gave the
public a glimpse at a much larger
debate over whether charter schools based in Los Angeles should be allowed to operate their special
education programs through a partnership with a far - off district that costs...
Washington Post is predicting school accountability
debates will quickly take
over the
public education debates in all 50 states as the ESEA rewrite shifts responsibilities to the states.
Gov. Scott Walker's announcement Friday to curtail union bargaining and require pension and health care contributions from
public employees upped the ante in a
debate over K - 12
education funding.
More information on the
debate over NAEP and the NAEP frameworks can be found on the Center for
Public Education Web site.
Edelblut's nomination sparked fierce
public debate, mirroring the outcry
over President Donald Trump's nomination of school choice advocate and wealthy GOP donor Betsy DeVos to lead the federal
education department.
For more than a decade, the
debate over public school reform has created friction between teachers unions, administrators, school boards, parents, policymakers, and other stakeholders in
public education and has fueled disagreements
over how to improve the quality of teaching and learning for children.
With little new
education policy expected in the remainder of Mayor Bill de Blasio's first term — and a quiet session on
education concluding in Albany — the
debate over traditional
public schools versus charter schools has shifted to a new battleground: school safety.
In a brazen effort to hand
over Hartford's Clark Elementary School to Friendship Charter Schools of Washington D.C. and divert more scarce
public funds to another out - of - state charter school management company, a special meeting of the Hartford Board of
Education has suddenly been called for tomorrow to approve a resolution «requesting» that Stefan Pryor, Governor Malloy's Commissioner of
Education, use his authority to simply hand Clark Elementary
over to Friendship Charter Schools without any further
debate or discussion.
As we demonstrated in our 2015 analysis of the Common Core
debate on Twitter, the dispute about the standards was largely a proxy war
over other politically - charged issues, including opposition to a federal role in
education, which many believe should be the domain of state and local
education policy; a fear that the Common Core could become a gateway for access to data on children that might be used for exploitive purposes rather than to inform educational improvement; a source for the proliferation of testing which has come to oppressively dominate
education; a way for business interests to exploit
public education for private gain; or a belief that an emphasis on standards reform distracts from the deeper underlying causes of low educational performance, which include poverty and social inequity.
Rather than confront the long - term, gritty challenges of implementing changes needed to fundamentally improve
public education, there is a tendency to turn inward to squabbles and
debates over the latest new idea — a much less difficult task.
As with charter schools,
debate over expanding empowerment zones to other districts is raising concerns from critics about privatizing
public education.
As the
debate over how to improve
public education has entered the national political arena, there is only room for dismay.
Privatizing
Public Space & Class Concerns Hang
Over Debate Ben Shepard, a college professor and member of self - described environmental
education and direct action organization Time's Up!
Public legal
education and information (PLEI) has a long history in Canada, but recently has received greater emphasis as a key component in the reinvigorated
debate over access to justice.
Amid parent concern
over new efforts to harness student data, an
education technologist talks about how
public discussion
over health data could positively influence current
debates over the use of student data.