With
the debate over welfare savings likely to form one of the central political battlegrounds of 2013, the deputy prime minister, speaking at a joint press conference with David Cameron at Downing Street, said: «I don't think it helps at all to try and portray that decision as one that divides one set of people against another, the deserving and the undeserving poor, people in work and out of work.»
Debates over the welfare state and provision of public services, for example, are legacies of conversations that started in the Thirties and Forties, and that remain unresolved.
The study was released along with previously available national data that, when taken together, have important implications for current policy
debates over welfare reform.
Not exact matches
No matter where one stands on the
debate over safety - net programs like
welfare and food stamps, or massive federal undertakings like Obamacare, everyone agrees that those need taxation to fund them.
Olasky's goal is to «push open the
debate»
over welfare reform by offering some legislative possibilities.
The very first argument advanced in the first congressional
debates over extending Medicaid funding to abortion referred to the many millions of dollars in future
welfare costs that abortion would save.
If the Tories do rear their «true» head & claim that the cuts will (& should) be permanent, then the
debate will be between amputation vs cure in how to deal with the deficit, breaking what patina of consensus still remains between political parties
over the necessity of the
welfare state.
We can quibble
over policy and strategic details: the way in which the
debate on immigration is following the
welfare debate is becoming divorced from fact; the persistent failure of banking «reform» to get to the fundamental issues; and the possibility that the government's dearth of competence may be a weaker spot than their closeness to fat cat Britain.
The steadily improving economy, Falkirk and Tory ascendancy
over debates like immigration and
welfare had Labour on the back foot throughout the summer.
Humane Canada supports stringent regulatory controls
over genetic engineering of animals and continues to promote knowledgeable international
debate on this issue by government, industry, the animal
welfare movement and the public.
Whilst many of us have anticipated these changes, it has been the
debate over environmental care, closer connection between citizens and the land, and animal
welfare that has raised awareness of the need to change both our methods of production and the means by which we process and distribute our food.