Not exact matches
At the end of his essay, Griffiths gives the impression that Pitstick should have limited herself to a school
debate with Balthasar over the merits of his
theology of Christ's descent rather
than raising the formal question of orthodoxy.
Scholasticism
Theology moved from the monastery to the university Western theology is an intellectual discipline rather than a mystical pursuit Western theology is over-systematized Western Theology is systematized, based on a legal model rather than a philosophical model Western theologians debate like lawyers, not like rabbis Reformation Catholic reformers were excommunicated and formed Protestant churches Western churches become guarantors of theological schools of thought Western church membership is often contingent on fine points of doctrine Some western Christians believe that definite beliefs are incompatible with tolerance The atmosphere arose in which anyone could start a church The legal model for western theology intensifies despite the rediscovery of
Theology moved from the monastery to the university Western
theology is an intellectual discipline rather than a mystical pursuit Western theology is over-systematized Western Theology is systematized, based on a legal model rather than a philosophical model Western theologians debate like lawyers, not like rabbis Reformation Catholic reformers were excommunicated and formed Protestant churches Western churches become guarantors of theological schools of thought Western church membership is often contingent on fine points of doctrine Some western Christians believe that definite beliefs are incompatible with tolerance The atmosphere arose in which anyone could start a church The legal model for western theology intensifies despite the rediscovery of
theology is an intellectual discipline rather
than a mystical pursuit Western
theology is over-systematized Western Theology is systematized, based on a legal model rather than a philosophical model Western theologians debate like lawyers, not like rabbis Reformation Catholic reformers were excommunicated and formed Protestant churches Western churches become guarantors of theological schools of thought Western church membership is often contingent on fine points of doctrine Some western Christians believe that definite beliefs are incompatible with tolerance The atmosphere arose in which anyone could start a church The legal model for western theology intensifies despite the rediscovery of
theology is over-systematized Western
Theology is systematized, based on a legal model rather than a philosophical model Western theologians debate like lawyers, not like rabbis Reformation Catholic reformers were excommunicated and formed Protestant churches Western churches become guarantors of theological schools of thought Western church membership is often contingent on fine points of doctrine Some western Christians believe that definite beliefs are incompatible with tolerance The atmosphere arose in which anyone could start a church The legal model for western theology intensifies despite the rediscovery of
Theology is systematized, based on a legal model rather
than a philosophical model Western theologians
debate like lawyers, not like rabbis Reformation Catholic reformers were excommunicated and formed Protestant churches Western churches become guarantors of theological schools of thought Western church membership is often contingent on fine points of doctrine Some western Christians believe that definite beliefs are incompatible with tolerance The atmosphere arose in which anyone could start a church The legal model for western
theology intensifies despite the rediscovery of
theology intensifies despite the rediscovery of the East
I love to discuss and
debate theology (as long as it's cordial and friendly), but more often
than not, I
debate it with myself.
Then again, Jesus would probably be hanging out with the sinners, prostitutes and all the others who don't quite fit the mold of what a good Christian should be, rather
than sitting in a booth at the mall
debating religion and
theology with the religious types.
During the
debate over «biblical inerrancy» that raged among evangelicalism for several years in the late 1970s, I remember someone observing that Harold Lindsell's 1976 book, The Battle for the Bible, which pretty much got that
debate going, was more a theory of institutional change
than it was about
theology as such.
This verse is ambiguous, and all sides of the
debate need to understand that we tend to force our
theology upon the text to get it to say what we want, rather
than allow it to remain ambiguous and move on to other texts which might be more clear.
But what makes Wright more
than just another crusty professor
debating doctrine from an ivory tower is his ability to translate complicated
theology into accessible literature for ordinary Christians.
He says that it appears Christians would rather spend their time arguing and
debating theology than helping the poor and homeless, and would rather drive Hummers and build huge church buildings
than drill wells in Africa or feed orphans.
We must also be careful not to oversimplify marginal positions that, in our time, may owe more to the legacy of German scholars like Julius Wellhausen
than they do to the Islamic tradition, which, for example,
debated not whether Ezra was «a major villain» but whether he was a prophet — and therefore infallible according to Islamic
theology — or a righteous Israelite.
But many critics tend to want to
debate nuances of
theology rather
than engage head - on the practical realities that many people are facing.
Better for those on both sides of the
debate to have the courage of their convictions and argue honestly
than to obscure the
theology behind the headlines.
This means that the argument is likely to be decided according to the rules of
theology rather
than the history of science, and Hoodbhoy may have had more justification
than he realised when he claimed that the
debate lay outside his competence.