Sentences with phrase «debate this topic because»

Not exact matches

I can't tell you how many Christians that I've debated on the gay marriage topic who finally, when presented with theological, social, and reasonable evidence to the contrary, just end up saying «just because.»

Because unfortunately, I don't debate with people that have no knowledge about the topic.

When Marcus Borg and I debate each other on these topics, we don't use the word «miracle» because we both agree that the term is too infected by post-Enlightenment debates.

The topic of inspiration (chapter II) was chosen because it continues to be the most debated issue in evangelicalism (cf. Kenneth Kantzer, ed., Evangelical Roots [Nashville: Nelson, 1978]-RRB-.

I always laugh when this topic comes up because the answer «no» doesn't even need lots of debate.

I don't mean to be dicky here because personally I don't really care what Michael Bennett did or didn't do, but what does drive me crazy is when people debate potentially - heated topics like this and don't read up on the most basic of facts, that are easily accessible, before trying to get a point across.

In this post, I review the research on sleep deprivation in babies and their parents, because I think this topic often gets lost in the debates about how our babies should sleep.

He has an obligation to the people to do that, because I think clearly last night what you saw 12 minutes for each in a very tightly formatted debate where there wasn't a free flow of discussions, where there wasn't follow up most of the time, and there were a lot of topics that wasn't discussed at all and I think we need to have that kind of honest debate.»

I am voting to close this question as primarily opinion - based, because to answer the question «is the UK really a democracy» we first would need to define what «a democracy» actually is, and that's a topic we could debate about endlessly.

Spelke, of course, was the natural choice to debate this topic, not only because she was a prominent, highly accomplished scientist at Summers's university but because she got there by studying precisely the innate abilities Summers wondered about.

They are no longer the topic of debate because it is simply assumed that these foods are unhealthy.

While several benefits of HGH have been clinically proven, the «effect» on penis size can be a topic of huge debate mainly because there are no scientific studies done on it except a few like this one which was done on young boys with growth hormone deficiency.

It's one of these topics which is greatly debated in the fitness world because it has evidence supporting both points of view.

It's partly because the topic is highly relevant to my forthcoming Letters to a Young Education Reformer, partly because of the well - deserved attention to Don Hirsch's new book Why Knowledge Matters, partly because expert predictions about everything from the consequences of Brexit to our current election have been so off, and partly because deference to (a vaguely conceived) «expertise» offers a fault line to so many of our current debates.

Because we understand the whole concept on drugs essay, the debates surrounding the topic, and the challenges faced, we write outstanding essays on drugs.

With books, that isn't so much a possibility because you can't scan a physical book and honestly I think this conversion of content limitation is one reason why ereaders are still a debated topic when IPods were an instant adoption.

This is one topic that is heavily debated because at issue isn't just the math, which depending on the mortgage interest rate, makes more sense financially to take as long as you can to pay off the house.

I know this topic has been a subject to a zillion debates and I also know that many of you disagree, but that's because some of you, just like the banks, might not see the whole picture.

Note: We didn't include any upcoming racing games in this post because whether racing is or is not a sport is a hot topic for debate among the sports world.

That climate silence occurred partly because the television reporters moderating the presidential debates did not pose a single question on the topic.

Perhaps they sound more intelligent on those type of policy issues because the topic has more immediacy for voters and therefore they follow better what is being «debated».

Science courts are needed because there are no formal forums for extensive debate about scientific topics, especially ones where «received opinion» reigns supreme.

Though scientific consensus must always be open to responsible skepticism given: (a) the strength of the consensus on this topic, (b) the enormity of the harms predicted by the consensus view, (c) an approximately 30 year delay in taking action that has transpired since a serious climate change debate began in the United States in the early 1980s, (d) a delay that has made the problem worse while making it more difficult to achieve ghg emissions reductions necessary to prevent dangerous climate change because of the steepness of reductions now needed, no politician can ethically justify his or her refusal to support action on climate change based upon a personal opinion that is not supported by strong scientific evidence that has been reviewed by scientific organizations with a wide breadth of interdisciplinary scientific expertise.

It was a debacle because Judith wasn't so afraid of debate that she felt she had to ban the topic, because she trusted the people here to discuss it and judge it with hardly any input from her, because she treats people with whom she disagrees with deep respect as human beings.

Brandon Shollenberger: I follow the global warming debate because some technical topics in it interest me,

I follow the global warming debate because some technical topics in it interest me, and I think it's a great demonstration of something I've long believed: the world is insane.

(This topic sparked another huge debate in Milan recently, when a young boy was made to eat alone because his parents sent a sandwich.)

Also, I can see this gaining (or at least staying in the news) in the same way this theory has (without specific debate to merits) because it's about a pop - culture relevant topic and apparently History Channel is already making a program on «what really killed the dinosaurs» much like they did last year on the Y - D impact to coincide with the «10,000 BC» movie.

Although, this shouldn't be too surprising as the block size debate is known to be one of the most controversial topics within bitcoin circles — with bitcoiners positioning themselves around two major camps: supporters of bigger blocks for the purpose of scaling and those who oppose bigger blocks because of centralization concerns.

I will not be drawn into a discussion or debate with you on this topic, therefore I will not engage in even trying to answer your questions, because as someone else already posted, you want to argue just for the sake of arguing.