Let's get the constitutional issues made more political, by getting them more often
debated as amendments.
Not exact matches
As the House tax committee weighed amendments to a bill that Democrats have blasted as a giveaway to corporations and the rich, the Washington tax reform debate was fast shifting to the Senate, where Republicans hold only a slim majorit
As the House tax committee weighed
amendments to a bill that Democrats have blasted
as a giveaway to corporations and the rich, the Washington tax reform debate was fast shifting to the Senate, where Republicans hold only a slim majorit
as a giveaway to corporations and the rich, the Washington tax reform
debate was fast shifting to the Senate, where Republicans hold only a slim majority.
= > that's a reasonable argument (I disagree with it), but
as the
amendment only has the affect of reducing the age at which the unborn childs rights are respected, the only point to
debate is what age it should be.
Politicians will have to weigh those during mark - ups, floor
debates, the
amendment process; for now, let's be
as clear
as possible about the ideals that should guide it.
As the Children's Schools and Families Bill 2009/2010 hurtles towards Royal Assent via the
debating of committee stage
amendments, there is a great deal at stake for home schoolers in particular and liberty in general.
In the most recent form of this
debate, the courts have ruled that Creation - Science is not science but the propagation of particular religious beliefs, and
as such the mandatory requirement of it being taught in public schools violates the establishment clause of the First
Amendment to the Constitution.
Most Americans assume that the separation of church and state is a fundamental principle deeply rooted in American constitutionalism; that the First
Amendment was intended to ensure that government does not involve itself with religion (and vice versa); and that contemporary
debates over such vexing issues
as school prayer, voucher programs, government funding of faith - based organizations, and the rights of religious minorities represent ongoing attempts to realize the separation intended by the Founders and like - minded early Americans.
MPs also
debated an
amendment backed by the British Humanist Association (BHA) which would have recognised their officials
as valid conductors of marriage ceremonies.
As he raised concerns over the sweeping changes to state government through a pair of constitutional
amendments proposed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie in a statement pointed to the relative short window of time
debate would be held over term limits and creating a full - time Legislature that bans outside income.
As Congress
debated amendments Thursday, Western New York Democrat Brian Higgins urged his colleagues not to roll back safety standards passed in response to the crash of Colgan Air Flight 3407 in Clarence Center.
The vote, which took place
as the Commons
debates Lords
amendments to the electoral registration and administration bill, will deepen already intense bitterness on the government backbenches over the coalition's stalled constitutional reform agenda.
At the end of the committee stage of the Article 50 Bill in the Commons, it felt
as if the
debates on the hundreds of
amendments and new clauses had been going on for 40 years.
It is considered by some parties
as illegitimate, posing a serious danger to Japan's democracy since the Prime Minister circumvented the constitutional
amendment procedure, dictating a radical change to the meaning of fundamental principles in the Constitution by way of Cabinet fiat without Diet
debate, vote, or public approval.
As Lord Harries of Pentregarth and Iain McLean have pointed out, and as the Guardian recognised at the time; in the main debate on the civil partnership bill in 2004, six bishops voted in favour of (and one against) a wrecking amendmen
As Lord Harries of Pentregarth and Iain McLean have pointed out, and
as the Guardian recognised at the time; in the main debate on the civil partnership bill in 2004, six bishops voted in favour of (and one against) a wrecking amendmen
as the Guardian recognised at the time; in the main
debate on the civil partnership bill in 2004, six bishops voted in favour of (and one against) a wrecking
amendment.
When Friday comes, the Speaker will be having constant discussions with the Tories
as to what amounts to a «reasonable» time for
debate for each group of
amendments.
Instead, on 2 December 1987 in committee, Conservative MP David Wilshire proposed an
amendment to the new Local Government Bill,
as not yet passed,
debated as Clause 27 and later
as Clause 28, intended to be equivalent to the Earl of Halsbury's Bill.
The
debate took place
as MPs considered Lords
amendments being rushed through the Commons in just two hours.
In an article in the Evening Standard defending her decision to vote against the government last night, the Conservative former education secretary Nicky Morgan says the government should drop the
amendment to the EU withdrawal bill fixing 29 March 2019
as Brexit day before it gets
debated next week.
The
amendment, to be
debated next Wednesday, came
as peers discussed a report by Lord Strathclyde into the power held by the Lords in the wake of the second chamber blocking government plans to cut # 4bn from working tax credits.
Time Business 3 pm Oral Questions Designation of sites
as Marine Conservation Areas - Lord Eden of Winton Consultation of early years practitioners on their plans to increase the maximum ratio of carers to babies and toddlers - Earl of Listowel Replacing the Cancer Drugs Fund with a new scheme - Lord Hunt of Kings Heath Legislation Succession to the Crown Bill - Report stage - Lord Wallace of Tankerness Legislation Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [HL]- Consideration of Commons
amendments - Baroness Wilcox Short
Debate Impact of discrimination against gay men and women in Commonwealth countries on efforts to halt the spread of HIV / AIDS - Lord Black of Brentwood
The Lords is likely to
debate any such
amendment on Monday, before batting the legislation back to the Commons, possibly on the same day, in a parliamentary process known
as ping - pong.
But the
debate over the
amendment lived on thanks to Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, who spent the week attacking the
amendment as a cheap way to buy votes for the overall measure — and an expensive burden on New York State.
Our U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer called the federal gun control
amendments about to be
debated by the Senate
as a «thoughtful» compromise, a «sweet spot» for a bitterly divided Congress.
Theresa May's steely gaze in the Lords this week,
as peers
debated amendments to the Article 50 bill, looks upon MPs
as well, daring them to stand up and oppose her plans and be branded traitors to the country by her cabal of rabid newspaper supporters and parliamentarians.
(It should be noted that Price made those comments during a
debate over an
amendment, which he supported, that would have defunded a handful of NSF projects targeted
as wasteful or unnecessary by GOP lawmakers; the hit list included grants to study bison hunting on the late prehistoric Great Plains and the sexual politics of waste in Dakar.)
One
amendment would have left its status open to
debate by creating two categories of planets — the eight «classical planets»
as well
as «dwarf planets» — that might have seemed to be on equal footing.
Although it is rare that a Private Member's Bill, such
as this proposed
amendment to the University of Ottawa Act, makes it through the many stages required before becoming law, putting the question on the floor of the legislature forces an open
debate on the issue, in full view of the public and the press.
The hearing itself was delayed for 2 hours
as the House
debated dozens of
amendments to the Republican plan to cut current spending by $ 61 billion.
It's confined to the final four months of his life,
as the Civil War was ending and the 13th
Amendment to abolish slavery was being
debated.
Washington — The White House and its supporters in the Congress reportedly have launched an offensive aimed at beginning
debate in the Senate
as early
as this week on a constitutional
amendment allowing voluntary prayer in public schools.
An easy shorthand is to think of this
debate as the tension between the Tenth and Fourteenth
Amendments to the US Constitution.
Leaders in both camps have been
debating charter funding in North Carolina for years, particularly since a 2010
amendment by Democrats in the legislature denied charters access to certain funding sources, such
as sales tax revenues, gifts and grants traditionally bound for public school coffers.
You have in your packet a blue sheet that gives you the order of the day, so I won't belabor that too much, but I will just remind you that we're going to start out with a session on history this morning; then go to a lunchtime segment that will focus on some of the relevant federal constitutional issues, including evaluations of the federal attacks on and defenses of the Blaine
amendments; then we will finish off the day with a session that will focus on litigation strategy related to these
amendments and some of the arguments being made for and against them in that litigation,
as well
as a focus on how
debates over faith - based initiatives and school vouchers are affected by these particular state constitutional restrictions.
These exhibitions, and the controversial works they presented, sparked a larger international and ongoing
debate about public funding for the arts, censorship and other First
Amendment concerns,
as well
as the definition of that which is considered art.
«Our leadership in the Southcoast delegation ensured significant procurement of renewable offshore wind, utilizing New Bedford
as the main port,» said State Senator Mark C. Montigny (D - New Bedford), who authored key
amendments during the 2016 energy
debate to ensure stable and consistent offshore wind procurements.
Even once this round of the
debate is done with, it is likely to be just the first in a line of proposed
amendments as supporters look for short term fix to those flat prices.
Yet, if it is primarily the preserve of constitutional theorists — think of the American
debate about the constitutionality of a proposed flag - burning
amendment — it is nevertheless an issue with practical implications,
as witnessed in the recent Pringle case before the CJEU.
Although the First
Amendment's talismanic sway in the United States isn't likely to diminish anytime soon, the push and pull between privacy and free speech is increasingly playing out here
as the right to be forgotten becomes a bigger part of the
debate.
With 30 years of litigation practice under his belt, Mercer is well placed to have pushed the
debate for change further this year
as the working group he leads proposed
amendments at the Law Society of Upper Canada that would allow non-lawyers to own up to 49 per cent of a law firm.
If Ministers now move to defeat
amendments made with near - consensus across the major parties» back benches, in the face of coalition tensions, this could be seen
as a move designed to occupy the likely limited time for
debate with issues already well - dissected.
But even if the 4th Circuit declines to consider the impacts of Packingham, I expect it to emerge
as a major influence in the ongoing
debate on the conflict between the First
Amendment and the ever expansive efforts of Hollywood to honor the motto of the DMCA: «with great power comes no responsibilities.»
The Senate vote tightened in the evening hours,
as the Senate's privacy hawks worked to drum up support for further
debate around the surveillance bill, opening the door for
amendments that could limit the government's ability to use the loophole to surveil American citizens without first obtaining a warrant.
A proposal to arm some teachers and school employees proved particularly contentious Tuesday
as Florida representatives
debated amendments to a school safety bill.
The significance of the distinction between differential treatment which can be characterised
as a special measure and differential treatment that arises from the unique cultural identity of a distinct cultural group was illustrated during the parliamentary and public
debates over the
amendments to the NTA and in particular over the
amendments which sought to remove the right to negotiate from the Act.