Sentences with phrase «debated this question for»

Scientists have fiercely debated this question for more than a century.

Physicists and cosmologists have been debating the question for the past decade.

Scientists will still debate the question for many years no matter which hypothesis you choose to call «null», but politically we must either act or not act - both choices have pricely consequences if we were to choose wrong.

Not exact matches

With this simple question, you would be exacting revenge for all the simplistic rhetoric and cynical policy proposals that have dominated the debate about the economy to date.

Employees were debating the question with vigor at the water cooler, making their cases for this animal or that one.

That is a question no - one seems to be asking in the debate over solar - power subsidies, or the bigger question of who pays for the state government's debt binge.

There have been just two questions on income inequality asked so far during the debates — one of which was directed at Sen. Rand Paul right before a commercial break (he focused on Federal Reserve policy), and the other which was for Gov. Mike Huckabee (who bemoaned general government incompetence).

For Trent Porter, certified financial planner and owner of Priority Financial Partners, the question of investment philosophy brings to mind the active - versus - passive debate.

As might be expected by a clash of polarized ideologies debating the question of taxing the rich, no resolution was found or maybe even seriously looked for.

The tough questions spark debate and create a valuable learning experience for both parties.

Not so long ago, that was a question for Wall Street analysts and venture capitalists to debate among themselves, being of little interest to anyone else.

Stop often and seek feedback on direction — In addition to asking questions to prompt a debate you should always check for feedback from the VC.

This debate raises profound questions — probably not for the last time — about the effectiveness of the Fed's easy - money policy.

That's the question at the heart of a debate over whether consumers deserve access to free loaner vehicles when their own vehicles are under recall for a safety defec

If this measure is re-introduced, Parliament should actively debate and question the rational for the increased liquidity.

There's no question that the volume has been turned up to 11 on the debate over whether Larry Summers, the controversial former treasury secretary or Fed vice-chair Janet Yellen or another candidate should guide U.S. monetary policy for the next four years.

Everything is up for question and debate, from the trivial («Larry, now that you're CEO will you start wearing a suit?»

In a debate that lasted more than eight hours, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras argued that the commission is a requirement from the people who expect answers, and a way to eliminate any «revanchist» intentions for the «many question marks» that have arisen over the last five years.

by Anita Anand At root, the debate over whether Canada should have a cooperative securities regulator (or some version thereof) stems from questions about the appropriate institutional supervisory structure for Canada's financial system.

And amid the debate over how far the government should go to protect certain industries in the era of global competition and technological change, some trade and industry experts are questioning whether the administration is simply using national security as an excuse for economic protectionism.

Given the sparse population west of Lake Superior at the time, the need for a subsidy for a large indivisible capital project is not in question but the size of the subsidy has been subject to debate.

This is directed at all the anti-christian posters, The topic at question is not open for debate of if there is a God, or if Jesus existed, He undoubtedly did and DOES.

This question is open for debate but the empirical evidence clearly shows that the vast majority of Holocaust victims were of darker features and skin tone.

But for these debating Catholics, the question is whether the American situation is curable, by some kind of reform program; or incurable, inherently tending to self - destruction.

But it was a very unsatisfying attempt — to have weighty theological questions determined by delegates who came together for a few days with little prior study of the issues, who were sometimes inclined to suppose that such questions admitted of «yes» or «no» answers, and who passed judgment after rather limited opportunity for discussion and debate.

The simple fact of the matter is that we can all debate all of these questions for eternity, but none of us will know the truth until we have ourselves died.

The answer to this question has been debated for centuries, and intelligent thinkers have come to different conclusions.

I'm up for any question or debate.

What that «something» is, however, needs to be open to question, and is always up for debate...

The Pope Center for Higher Education Policy debates the question, «Should colleges be required to pay out a percentage of their endowments?»

Scientists who don't debate or question settled science might miss opportunities for a new breakthrough that hadn't been observed or conceived of by a human mind.

The question we're debating here for the most part is, «Do you believe in far - fetched things for which you have zero evidence?»

Those hoping for a hard - hitting debate, or a quick and full resolution of the questions, were bound to be disappointed: the three interlocutors were much too patient, irenic, and thoughtful for that.

Question for debate: All - in, has religion been a «net positive» or «net negative» for humans since their beginning?

Michele Bachmann was asked during the Iowa G.O.P. debate what she meant when she said the Bible obliged her to «be submissive» to her husband, and there was an audible wave of boos — for the question, not the answer.

I do believe there are answers to such questions, but I have learned that when a person is suffering or in pain, this is not the best time for theological debates and discussions.

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there)

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.

Thus the central question in the welfare debate for conservatives is how to overcome the «passivity of the poor.»

That's not honest debate, it is merely sidestepping those questions or views which you have no answer for.

It is not simply a matter of debating whether God exists or not, for this begs the basic question of what is meant by the word «God».

(CNN)-- On Friday we posted a story about U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann responding to a question about a biblical admonition for wives to be submissive to their husbands during Thursday's Republican presidential debate.

I am open for any debate or questions, but again you have to understand that i am young and still have much to learn so i will admit when i do not know the answer.

I question the source that came up with this for you, but I think there's a higher debate over whether successful people should be automatically branded in a negative, manipulative light.

Questions are the best catalyst for discussion and debate.

The genuine conflict between theological paradigms operative in the debates of the Second Vatican Council during my own formative years of theological study in Rome focused the question for me initially as one within my own Roman Catholic Church community.

On the hotly debated question of Communion for divorced and remarried Catholics, the synod's report offers a solution of the «penitential path» or a period of reflection and penance which would allow the partners in a second marriage to receive communion.

These convictions posit the necessity — before a church lobby can exist, before the mobilization of opinion behind specific policies can be achieved — to create a process for broadening and deepening public debate on urgent questions.

Beneath such discrete polity debates lies the question of the readiness of the powerful to pay for civilization.

«It is not, therefore a matter of debating doctrinal questions,» said Archbishop Bruno Forte, who will be the special secretary for the synod, «which have in any case been clarified by the magisterium.»