Teaching is beginning to encounter a push toward a market approach, as evidenced by
debates about charter schools, school choice, and school vouchers.
A number of forward looking cities have set aside contentious
debates about charter schools, and have instead chosen to embrace high - quality charter schools in their reform strategies.
While her nomination gave exposure to an honest and passionate
debate about charter schools as an alternative to traditional public schools, her hardline opposition to any real accountability for these publicly funded, privately run schools undermined their founding principle as well as her support.
Insist on an evidence - based
debate about charter schools and vouchers.
Breathtaking results from yet another study, and the announcement that three prominent Boston lawyers plan to mount a constitutional challenge to Massachusetts» charter public school cap, have reignited the seemingly endless
debate about charter schools» place in the commonwealth's education marketplace.
Not exact matches
Shaw is an active partner to leaders in government and public and
charter education around the role of independent
schools in the vital
debate about the future of education.
«Do I think there will be discussions
about charter schools and a robust
debate?
UPPER WEST SIDE — A state senator's use of the n - word is adding fire to an already heated
debate about Harlem Success Academy's plans to open an Upper West Side
charter school.
It has also reviewed hundreds of thousands of reports to aid in distinguishing the best - quality research from weaker work, including studies on such subjects as the effectiveness of
charter schools and merit pay for teachers, which have informed the ongoing
debate about these issues.
Highlights of the conference include include
debates and resolutions
about controversial teacher testing,
charter schools, and a proposal by AFT president calling for an extra year of high
school to help prevent high
school - dropout rates from climbing.
Concerns
about charter schools include them challenging the long - existing status quo (there are more than 4,000 in the U.S.); adding fuel to the
debate of vouchers, markets, and choice; and affecting the funding of traditional
schools, seemingly pitting
charter activists against traditional
school educators.
The
debate has raised uncomfortable questions
about charter school discipline of black children.
In recent weeks, an ongoing
debate about charter -
school authorizing has roared back to life.
And substantial percentages remain undecided
about charter schools and other reform initiatives, suggesting that the current national
debate over
school policy has the potential to sway public opinion in one direction or another.
In joining this
debate, Greene mischaracterizes generally positive findings by Harris's Education Research Alliance for New Orleans (ERA)
about the role of my organization, The National Association of
Charter School Authorizers (NACSA), in managing the Louisiana Recovery
School District's (RSD) application processes between 2008 and 2013.
Before the
debate, learn more
about the issue, as well as the speakers» stances on
charter schools and educational equity.
One explanation is that the
debate about whether
charter schools «work,» with its focus on testing and college placement, loses sight of the many reasons why people choose a
school and what they value in an education.
For all the policy chatter and
debate out there
about funding inequities (between
charters and neighborhood
schools is one favorite), you don't hear much talk
about just how inequitable the funding gaps can be among the 15,000 or so
school districts (or among
schools within the same district — don't even get me started).
The Education Next poll leaders didn't explore why support for
charters has dropped so precipitously, though they speculated that a growing public
debate about charters, including a call for a freeze on new
charter schools by the NAACP, played a role.
After all, while we may indeed be entering a new phase of the
charter school debate — one where
charters have lost much of their luster — prudence suggests awaiting further confirmation before concluding we've just witnessed a sudden
about - face in a two - decade trend.
In the heat of the
school choice
debate, one of our parents at North Broward Academy of Excellence wants to spread the good news
about charter schools.
It matters because if we are to
debate charter school policy or support or criticism of
charter schools, we need to be clear what and whom we are talking
about.
Amidst all of the political back and forth
about charter schools, no one seems to be discussing the most important people in the
debate — our students with the greatest needs.
Charter schools were vindicated by these new findings, but the debate about both reports failed to include the most important issue facing charter schools: an inability to effectively serve students with special needs due to excessive delays and insufficient staffing in the NYC Department of Education's Committees for Special Edu
Charter schools were vindicated by these new findings, but the
debate about both reports failed to include the most important issue facing
charter schools: an inability to effectively serve students with special needs due to excessive delays and insufficient staffing in the NYC Department of Education's Committees for Special Edu
charter schools: an inability to effectively serve students with special needs due to excessive delays and insufficient staffing in the NYC Department of Education's Committees for Special Education.
I remember that when I made my first attempt to go back to college four months after having my daughter Cereta in 1999, I read a book for one of my educational courses
about the
debate over
charter versus traditional
schools.
Whatever anyone thinks
about charter schools or district
schools, education reformers or teachers unions, Democrats or Republicans, or any other false choice that has divided our politics and our district, let's stipulate that everyone on all sides of this
debate are good people who care
about kids.
In the education reform
debate,
school choice options — namely
charter schools — are among the most buzzed
about topics.
When all of those mothers and grandmothers were calling me each August, they did not care
about the
charter school versus district
school debate.
As the
debate about the value of
charters is heating up to new levels since the news that billionaire
school reform leader Eli Broad and several other powerful players are planning a massive expansion of
charter schools in LA Unified, these numbers are likely to be spun in both directions by the opposing sides of the
charter debate.
Nationwide the
charter school sector has grown over the past few decades amid a
debate about its virtues and drawbacks — and even whether the publicly funded
schools are public or private entities.
This is not to start a
debate about charter vs. traditional public
schools.
I remember when I made my first attempt to go back to college four months after having my daughter Cereta in 1999, I read a book for one of my educational courses
about the
debate over
charter versus traditional
schools.
Amid
debate about where
charter schools fit into the spectrum of public education options, I accepted an invitation to visit Horizon Science Academy - McKinley Park on Chicago's South Side.
Grant Callen, Clarion Ledger Guest Columnist, October 23, 2016 For more than a decade, a political
debate took place in the media, across the state and under the Capitol dome
about whether Mississippi would allow public
charter schools to operate.
«My position
about charter schools is I think it's an interesting idea, and I think unfortunately it's been caught up in the ideological
debate between left and right and has been distorted in the battle,» Marshak said.
What stands out most
about the
debate around unionizing
charter schools, however, is how shockingly little we know
about what it even means.
The report generated a little buzz, as it was used to inform the
debate between Hillary Clinton's campaign and
charter defenders
about whether or not most
charter schools serve hard - to - teach kids.
Education advocacy — and I'm talking mainly
about the
debate on
charter schools, vouchers, and tracking
school progress (aka accountability)-- deserves your attention.
I hope we can move past tired
debates about whether
charter schools should, can or do serve students with disabilities.
Hidden behind the
debate about turnaround programs,
charter schools, standardized testing, evaluation methods and the common core curriculum rages a far more fundamental argument; what do we actually expect our public education to achieve... What is the purpose of public education?
Adding to the performance
debate are questions
about whether
charter schools should «backfill» seats that open up when students leave during the year by admitting new students from their waitlists.
And the
debate continues to boil as legislative leaders talk
about rewriting the state's 16 - year - old
charter school law to add protections for
charters and local communities.
New Jersey's ongoing
debate about whether traditional public
schools or
charters do a better job educating students got some provocative new data yesterday, courtesy of a study from Stanford University that came down on the side of the
charters — particularly in Newark's embattled
school district.
The story of the two
schools highlights the fissures in a national
debate about what to do with
charters that don't perform well.
Charter schools» ntense rate of growth has fueled an equally intense
debate about the role they'll play in the future of U.S. education.
Truthfully, there is no national
debate about the future of public
charter schools.
The rise of
charter schools and academies has precipitated a Cambrian explosion of new ideas and innovations, stimulating a
debate about methodology led by teachers themselves.
Achievement First Inc. one of the nation's larger
charter school management companies with 20
schools in New York and Connecticut, is rapidly expanding in Connecticut, despite the fact that the 2012 education reform
debate is supposed to include a discussion
about whether the state should make greater use of the
charter school model.
«We're seeing in the last year or so that the silver bullets are starting to lose their luster —
charter schools, merit pay and mayoral control,» said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers and a major figure in the country's
debate about the role of teachers» unions in public education.
The
debate erupted during talks
about the renewal and a new application for two
charter schools run by Partnership to Uplift Communities (PUC).