In a modern, free, and democratic society, I would say there are two big
debates about freedom taking place.
United by the common use of Pop's rich visual strategies, the artists made bold contributions to conceptualism, performance and new media art, as well as social protest, justice movements and
debates about freedom.
The second paragraph of the WSJ story states, «' I don't want to have a national
debate about freedom of religion when my whole purpose was to defend a strong and wonderful and appropriate city ordinance,» said Ms. Parker, a Democrat and the city's first openly gay mayor.»
Not exact matches
Today this overlaps with
debates about the actual content of religious education and
about the
freedom to offer children what the Church really teaches.
But increasingly the
debate is becoming one
about religion, in which critics accuse backers of the referendum of bigotry and insist a ban would violate the First Amendment's religious
freedoms.
In The Self and the Dramas of History Niebuhr returned to the
debate about man's nature and
freedom, and this book may be read as Niebuhr's public reply to Tillich.
The few sustained
debates about «religious tests» and «religious
freedom» treated the potential for religious monopolies, hegemonies or majorities - and even religion itself - as a problem.
That, if they would only listen to themselves more carefully, is what some advocates of academic
freedom are asserting in current
debates about Christian higher education.
Despite the officious black
debate / rhetoric
about how much
freedom has been achieved, everyone knows that the overt and more intentional sorts of oppression that existed North and South have been defeated.
Robert T. Miller replies to R. R. Reno on capitalism and economic
freedom: The
debate on economic issues between conservatives and liberals is not
about whether the government should regulate the market or whether wealth should be redistributed.
«The level of attention reflects the degree to which people care
about the very American values under
debate: recognition of the rights of others, tolerance and
freedom of worship.»
The letter urges followers to frame this as a
debate about religious
freedom, not contraception, because it's a more effective way to sway public opinion.
Story says, «The letter urges followers to frame this as a
debate about religious
freedom, not contraception, because it's a more effective way to sway public opinion.»
Again,
debates about freewill and predestination continue in each century, whether the adversary of
freedom is alleged, (all too often in abdication of personal responsibility!)
The present political situation in Latin America has generated so much heated
debate about the Church, the «sects,» and religious
freedom that it has become necessary to take a closer look at the existing religious scene, including Pentecostalism, if we are to build a coherent theological overview of the region capable of generating serious ecumenical dialogue.
With all the furor and dishonesty over the Supreme Court's decisions on contraception and the Religious
Freedom Restoration Act, it's a good moment to think
about what kinds of structural weaknesses the center - right has in public
debate and what can be done to address some of those weaknesses.
Mercifully, there were no questions
about so - called «religious
freedom» — which has replaced «family values» as the preferred code word for anti-gay bigotry — during last night's GOP presidential
debate.
As a former chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, David Davis was always likely to want to contribute from the self - imposed
freedom of the backbenches to the
debate about how to get the public finances under control.
We often hear
about the
debate of how Subject Matter Experts meddle with Instructional Strategies and how Instructional Designers do not have the
freedom to develop their own product.
There is also an interesting clip
about online trolling -
freedom of expression or should trolling be made illegal - class
debate.
Learning leaders discover new ways to think
about teaching and learning because there is a
freedom to express, challenge and
debate.
But taken as a whole, they offer a striking, alarming overview of how profound is the confusion among writers, including authors published many times over,
about (a) where they stand in the industry, (b) what the new «
freedom» of digital publishing really means for them, and (c) how the core industry is
debating the business» future.
It's important that you know that
about me because most of my views on investing have been influenced by what the Financial
Freedom Community learned
about what the historical stock - return data really says during its Great Safe Withdrawal Rate
Debate of recent years.
Michael Elion's «Perceiving
Freedom», a set of oversized Ray - Ban sunglasses sponsored by Ray - Ban and supposedly
about Mandela and his incarceration on Robben Island, set off a
debate about the lack of a public arts policy in the South Africa's «Mother City».
If how we make visible the plight of others and keep their stories
debated and alive is one strand of the exhibition, tied up with this are ideas
about how we defend and celebrate the
freedoms we possess.
The painting has provoked protests and sparked
debates about white exploitation of black trauma,
freedom of expression and censorship.
«Czech President Vaclav Klaus said Tuesday he is ready to
debate Al Gore
about global warming, as he presented the English version of his latest book that argues environmentalism poses a threat to basic human
freedoms.
Quote: Czech President Vaclav Klaus said Tuesday in the USA that he is ready to
debate Al Gore
about global warming, as he presented the English translation of his latest Czech - language book that argues that environmentalism poses a threat to basic human
freedoms.
The real war — if there is a war, some might dare to suggest that it is simply
debate about policy in a democratic society — is a war against journalistic
freedom to present Greens such as George Monbiot and Bob Ward as the utter lunatics they really are.
2.10.2 Intellectual
freedom includes: (a) the rights of all Staff to express opinions
about the operation of the University and higher education policy more generally; (b) the rights of Staff to pursue critical open enquiry and to discuss freely, teach, assess, develop curricula, publish and research within the limits of their professional competence and professional standards; (c) the right to participate in public
debates and express opinions
about issues and ideas related to their discipline area; (d) the right of all Staff to participate in professional and representative bodies and to engage in community service without fear of harassment, intimidation or unfair treatment; and (e) the right to express unpopular or controversial views, although this does not mean the right to vilify, harass or intimidate.
As for the aforementioned New York Times piece
about Peltz's lawsuit, it concludes with what may be a classic case of understatement: «The Arkansas case could do more than give law students practical experience before they take the bar; it could also renew
debate about free speech on campus and academic
freedom.»
They talk
about wide range of subjects including feminist
debates around pornography and sex work, University of Chicago's recent statement on safe spaces,
freedom of speech and political correctness, cyber sex - work, Bedford Vs. Canada case, and the common grounds between radical feminism and the religious far - right.
They talk
about wide range of subjects including feminist
debates around pornography and sex work, University of Chicago's recent statement on safe spaces,
freedom of speech and political correctness, cyber sex - work, Bedford [v] Canada case, and the common grounds between radical feminism and the religious far - right.»
The
debate about whether government's powers have been reduced or defeated, or on the other hand whether they have become too intrusive or harmful, tends to focus on
freedom of expression and of political opposition, and the means available to suppress these activities.
One consequence of the Commons expenses scandal is that the
Freedom of Information Act 2000, under which ministers had shown signs of restiveness, must now be regarded as politically secure and, indeed, that there can be a serious
debate about whether it should be strengthened.
To give a few examples: A couple gets into an intense
debate over a content issue, such as whether their teenage daughter needs more structure or more
freedom to make mistakes, and you find yourself losing track of their process and getting sucked into a
debate about the merits of different parenting styles, giving advice and quoting parenting experts.