Good science can combat misinformation, but it won't resolve public
debates over homosexuality.
But, upon thinking about it, I decided that nothing is more appropriate than interrupting our comments about
the debate over homosexuality with ten - word reminders of the hope of the gospel, which gives every conversation new depth and meaning.
Not exact matches
While
debate over the understanding of Biblical interpretation lies at the heart of current evangelical discussions concerning women, differences in theological tradition lie at the center of discussions
over social ethics, and disagreement
over one's approach toward the wider secular culture is surfacing as the focus of controversy regarding
homosexuality.
:] Although I had a quite heavy
debate with some folks
over here on evolution, big bang, and stuff that ended up in issues on
homosexuality: liberal Christians = accepting evolution = accepting big bang = accepting gays = no grace = highway to hell.
When Justin shared his struggle, they were kind, but tended to turn every conversation into a
debate over Scripture and
homosexuality.
At the Pope's insistence, the bishops did a reset, plunging the Church into renewed
debate over divorce and
homosexuality and cutting short the conversation that the Pope had earlier invited
over famine, persecution and want.
The stage for the election was set last winter when Jonathan Wilson, a 12 - year board member, publicly declared his
homosexuality during a bitter
debate over a proposed curriculum on sexual orientation.