I believe we can't possibly get to a better place, in
debates over issues like global warming, until we understand why getting facts across turns out to be so difficult.
His aggressive approach politicized nearly all that it touched, leaving in its wake unnecessarily divisive national
debates over issues like Common Core and sexual harassment on college campuses.
Thanks to the lobbying work of the coal and oil companies, and the vast army of thinktanks, PR consultants and astroturfers they have sponsored, thanks too to the domination of the airwaves by loony right shock jocks,
the debate over issues like this has become so mad that any progress at all is little short of a miracle.
Not exact matches
Like the
debate over Austin's best BBQ joint, the
issue wasn't settled during SXSW.
The head of a controversial assisted - suicide group in Switzerland says he will seek legal permission to help a Canadian woman and other healthy people
like her kill themselves, raising startling new
issues in the emotional
debate over euthanasia.
Most Americans assume that the separation of church and state is a fundamental principle deeply rooted in American constitutionalism; that the First Amendment was intended to ensure that government does not involve itself with religion (and vice versa); and that contemporary
debates over such vexing
issues as school prayer, voucher programs, government funding of faith - based organizations, and the rights of religious minorities represent ongoing attempts to realize the separation intended by the Founders and
like - minded early Americans.
In this framework,
issues like covenant marriage vows, home ownership, gun ownership, home birth, homeschooling, family business, family farming, hospitality, home - based healthcare and yes, even the
debate over raw milk, can all be decided in the light of God's Word under the Lordship of Jesus Christ.
That problem is ever so evident here in the good old US where we waste valuable time in our legislature
debating sexual
issues because the extremist fringe has taken
over the Repugnican party and forces us to deal with non-
issues that distract us from real problems
like poverty, health and war.
NYT:»... the election followed a fierce, if brief, campaign in which a
debate over same - sex marriage, which Mr. Peralta favors and Mr. Monserrate opposes, often overshadowed discussions on
issues that are vital to many of the largely Hispanic district's working - class and immigrant residents,
like affordable health care and school overcrowding.
The summer
issue of Education Next includes a
debate over whether charter schools should continue to expand in cities
like Washington, D.C. so that a larger share of students are attending charter schools.
Hardcore Pokemaniacs may
debate me on this
issue, saying tweaks to the metagame
like the split of attacks into physical and special categories or the recent Mega-Evolutions changed the way how people play competitively but at its core, Pokémon's battle system has not changed in
over 10 years and it needs a good revision to stay current.
Still, I
like the idea of having our own working list here, in part to shift this discussion away from unresolvable whipsaw
debates (
over issues like how fast and far sea levels will rise by 2100).
I'd
like to do more pieces
like «Beyond the Eternal Food Fight» and «
Debate Over Climate Risks — Natural or Not,» in which I convene via e-mail a batch of experts on
issues related to sustainable human advancement.
And then there's the
issue of hypocrisy when, as observed earlier by Judith Curry, «employees of green advocacy groups can participate as authors of the IPCC reports (without apparent criticism), but a non-advocate scientist [
like Lennart Bengtsson] can not participate in a (non-green) think tank without censure from scientist colleagues... Honest brokers are to be preferred
over advocates; but the real problem arises when advocates seek to stifle scientific and policy
debates.»
From the macro perspective the arguments are of a very point to the overall
issue, but bloggers seem to love to
debate the
issue somewhat
like argueing
over «how many angels can fit onto the head of a pin».
We will certainly never see a long written (or otherwise)
debate between an alarmist
like «Dr.» Mann and a realist
like Steve McIntyre
over the
issues, and I disrepair of ever seeing even lesser lights on each side squaring off in a real
debate.
It's worthwhile trying to understand how they work, not least because some of the same tactics are now being used in
debates over other
issues,
like Social Security.
The legality of file sharing has been hotly
debated in this country for many years, and the
issue boiled
over again recently with the Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) trading pot shots in the press with copyright luminaries
like Michael Geist and Howard Knopf
over both the legality of the practice and its effect on the recording industry.