Science has not played nearly as prominent a role as it should in informing
debates over the labeling of genetically modified foods, end of life care and energy policy, among many issues.
Liz Wilks, Director of Sustainability & Stakeholder Engagement Europe for Asia Pulp & Paper, examines the role of packaging in the craft drinks industry and the current
debate over labelling standards
Not exact matches
Prescinding from the conventional
debate over the relative importance of civil and political rights on the one hand, and economic and social rights on the other, we ought to be able to agree on those elementary rights that have priority
over any political or economic program, regardless of that program's ideological
label.
In a series of articles and editorials that appeared in both magazines during 1977, differences of opinion
over the church's involvement in society were defined and
debated with little resolution.11 Although both sides refrained from
labeling it merely a contemporary version of the
debate between sixteenth century Anabaptism and sixteenth - century Calvinism, both recognized the importance their historical antecedents played in the discussion.
The
debate continues
over whether these newer practices can be
labeled as organic or not.
... followed byan Opening Symposium on regenerative agriculture and the
debate over a «regenerative organic»
label.
With intense
debate over GM
labeling of food products continuing, a number of speakers will discuss the future direction of GM
labeling in North America.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Thursday rolled out a food
labeling program for produce and other agricultural products that are made in New York, but sidestepped a
debate over whether the criteria should include food produce through genetically modified organisms.
The following Monday, a codes committee meeting chaired by Assemblyman Joe Lentol dragged on for
over two hours as lawmakers
debated issues such as GMO
labelling and daily fantasy sports.
Impact on Evolution
Debates over whether to
label viruses as living lead naturally to another question: Is pondering the status of viruses as living or nonliving more than a philosophical exercise, the basis of a lively and heated rhetorical
debate but with little real consequence?
The
debate over the safety and environmental sustainability of GMOs has intensified in the last year in the United States, with California placing a measure to
label food products with genetically altered ingredients on its November ballot.
I think it even sparks the
debate over the «gifted»
label again, since there so many more concerning issues at play other than just the «gift» of high intelligence.
Ingredient
labels and
debates over the best way to feed cats can be confusing.
The original Doom itself provoked considerable
debate over the depiction of violence in first - person shooters, with US army colonel David Grossman famously
labelling the game a «mass murder simulator» and claiming that this, and similar titles, were teaching children how to kill.
The alleged scientific majority has declared that the
debate is
over and anything the minority scientists say is
labeled as disinformation and prosecutable.
So what should we
label the
debate over changes to our justice system?