Sentences with phrase «debt charges»

The decline to date in public debt charges of $ 1.4 billion (8.9 %) largely reflects lower average effective interest rates and lower inflation adjustments on Real Return Bonds.
Have you had any bad debts charged off by other creditors?
The decline to date in public debt charges of $ 1.1 billion largely reflects lower average effective interest rates and lower inflation adjustments on Real Return Bonds.
The decline in public debt charges reflects lower effective interest rates, as the stock of interest - bearing debt is higher.
Public debt charges increased by $ 0.2 billion, as an increase in the stock of debt was largely offset the effect of lower interest rates.
Public debt charges declined by $ 1.6 billion, reflecting the impact of lower effective interest rates, as the stock of interest - bearing debt increased.
The decline in public debt charges for the first quarter is also well above that forecast for the year as a whole.
The artworks can be bought for the artist's monthly debt charge.
The public debt charges ratio is expected to increase, attributable to the impact of higher interest rates and an increase in the stock of debt.
Within total expenses, lower program expenses were largely offset by higher public debt charges.
The Department of Finance attributes the decline in public debt charges due to lower inflation adjustments on real return bonds and a lower effective interest rate on the stock of interest - bearing debt.
In 1994 - 95, public debt charges as a percentage of revenues amounted to 33.8 per cent.
But in Toronto or Vancouver where mortgages already eat at least half family income, a 2 % rate jump would see debt charges consuming about two - thirds of their earnings.
For example, an important question regarding recent household deleveraging has been to what extent the decline in aggregate household debt was attributable to delinquent debt charge - offs as opposed to active debt paydowns by consumers.
The deficit improves by $ 0.4 billion in 2011 - 12, increasing slowly to $ 1.2 billion by 2015 - 16, as somewhat higher revenues and lower public debt charges more the offset higher program expenses.
The explanation provided was that as a «result of accounting changes due to the Jobs and Economic Action Plan, public debt charge forecasts from the Federal Budget are no longer a reasonable estimate of cash - basis expenditures for reporting in the Estimates» [5].
This component is quantified by calculating the ratio of revolving debt charged on the credit card against the prescribed card limit.
Assuming the year - over-year growth rates to date are applicable for the year as a whole, corporate income tax revenues would be $ 0.8 billion higher, employment insurance benefits $ 0.8 billion lower, direct program expenses $ 1.2 billion lower and public debt charges $ 0.4 billion lower.
The Department of Finance attributes the increase in public debt charges due to inflation adjustments on real return bonds and a higher stock of interest - bearing debt.
Public debt charges as a percentage of interest - bearing debt (the average effective interest rate) in 2009 - 10 is about half that in 1994 - 95.
Of the $ 2.9 billion year - over-year improvement, budgetary revenues were up by $ 3.4 billion, public debt charges declined by $ 1.1 billion, while program expenses were up by $ 1.6 billion.
We think that the bad debt charges from moderately rising unemployment and stagnating housing prices will be actually quite well contained for the overall UK banking system.
Budgetary revenues are expected to be $ 5.0 billion higher than forecast in the April 2017 Budget, program expenses $ 3.1 billion higher and public debt charges $ 0.4 billion lower.
Putting public debt charges on an accrual basis would raise the Main Estimates by $ 2.7 billion.
«Our higher deficit forecast largely reflects our higher projections for public debt charges, direct program expenses and children's benefits,» the PBO wrote in its report.
Public debt charges were down $ 200 million or 0.7 per cent due mainly to a lower average effective interest rate.
Not only that, but keep in mind what rate each debt charges, so you can calculate how much you're paying in interest.
As clearly demonstrated by developments of the last two years, you do not have control over budgetary revenues, cyclically sensitive spending, such as unemployment insurance benefits, and public debt charges.
The improvement in the current fiscal results was due to higher revenues and lower public debt charges, which more than offset higher program expenses.
Lower - than - expected program expenses ($ 8.0 billion) and public debt charges ($ 1.9 billion), partially dampened by lower budgetary revenues ($ 3.9 billion) explain the $ 6.0 billion improvement in the deficit since the June 2011 Budget.
Monthly public debt charges are also running well below their 2012 Budget forecast.
With interest rates lower than projected in the March 2012 Budget, public debt charges are correspondingly lower.
The improvement in the current fiscal results of $ 2.3 billion is due to higher revenues (up $ 2.8 billion or 4.7 per cent) and lower public debt charges (down $ 0.4 billion or 5.2 per cent), dampened by somewhat higher program expenses (up $ 1.0 billion or 1.8 per cent).
The decline in public debt charges was attributable to a lower average effective interest rate on interest - bearing debt.
This gain in credibility contributed to a rapid decline in long - term interest rates, which in turn significantly reduced public debt charges and contributed to stronger economic growth and government revenues.
Public debt charges were down $ 0.6 Â billion, reflecting reductions in market debt.
Public debt charges were $ 0.3 billion lower (7.1 %), largely reflecting lower CPI adjustments on Real Return Bonds.
Public debt charges were $ 141 million lower -LRB--0.6 %), largely reflecting lower CPI adjustments on Real Return Bonds.
Public debt charges, given the current lower outlook for interest rates, could come in lower than expected as well.
Public debt charges were down $ 141 million or 0.6 %.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z