Some credit counseling and
debt relief companies say bankruptcy should be avoided at all costs so they can promote their brand of debt help.
The debt relief company says they can negotiate the total down by half to, say, $ 10,400, and that it will only charge you a «fee» of 25 percent of the $ 9,600 you «save».
Not exact matches
They
said the
company is not currently pursuing a
debt restructuring, although it is seeking
relief from a $ 225 million term loan due in 2020 and $ 200 million revolving credit line that comes due in 2019.
«
Debt relief or settlement
companies often claim that they can work with your creditors to reduce the amount of money you owe, but that doesn't necessarily mean your loan will settle,»
said Dudum.
And the leaders of K - 12 Inc. settled a high - profile court case with California Attorney General Kamala Harris this year, agreeing to dispense millions in payments and
debt relief to their nonprofit school operators after state officials
said the Virginia - based
company misled the state in order to take in more public funding.
Last year the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau took action against two
companies — College Education Services and Student Loan Processing — that it
said «exploited vulnerable student loan borrowers, made false promises about their
debt relief services, and charged illegal upfront fees.»
No other Arizona
debt relief company can
say that!
«Federal prosecutors have been very aggressive in going after so - called student
debt relief companies in recent years,» Michelle Corey, president and CEO of the Better Business Bureau in St. Louis,
said in the release.
Some of the most common reviews simply
say what a great
company Freedom
Debt Relief is to work with.
«We see clients who are desperate for help after being victimized by disreputable
debt relief companies,»
said Thomas DiFiore, Staff Attorney and Team Leader for the Bay Area Legal Services Inc. «The Attorney General's consumer protection initiative is exactly what our clients need.»
They
say «This Watch List names
companies that charge for fraudulent or questionable
debt relief services.»
The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit Feb. 9, 2017, against three interrelated student loan
debt relief companies for allegedly violating Section 5 of the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule.The FTC issued a press release
saying that the defendants illegally charged thousands of consumers more than $ 28 million.
As they
say, «The National
Debt Relief Foundation, in conjunction with creditors, consumers and debt settlement companies, has created the Fair Credit Assessment Program (FCAP) and FCAP Index.&ra
Debt Relief Foundation, in conjunction with creditors, consumers and
debt settlement companies, has created the Fair Credit Assessment Program (FCAP) and FCAP Index.&ra
debt settlement
companies, has created the Fair Credit Assessment Program (FCAP) and FCAP Index.»
Where the FTC missed the target was when they
said the new rules did not apply to secured
debt because they felt «There is no evidence in the record of deceptive or abusive practices in the promotion of services for the
relief of non-mortgage secured
debt» but they appear to have missed the recent influx of auto loan modification
companies that are springing up.
Especially when the FTC has
said «If you work with
debt relief companies, review their policies, procedures and operations to make sure they're complying with the Rule.