Not exact matches
For many years
debt relief plan
providers, such as nonprofit credit counselors, and
debt settlement service
providers, have been seen as two separate and distinct structures
in the
debt relief services industry.
You can always attempt to negotiate your
debts down without a service
provider, but National
Debt Relief can demonstrate the value
in their services with savings to you.
If any
debt relief provider discourages you from examining every option before forcing you to make a decision, that is NOT
in your best interest and you have to ask yourself why are they doing that.
The change is that companies offering
debt relief services over the phone can not collect advance fees from you before settling or reducing your
debt, before having an agreement for
debt management or other services
in place, or until you've made at least one payment to a creditor as a result of a plan negotiated by the
debt relief provider.
Selecting the right
debt relief option and
debt relief provider for you is going to be one of the most important things you do
in your life.
The importance
in talking to these other
debt relief solution
providers can't be understated.
Moreover, a regulatory scenario
in which up - front fees are not prohibited places those
debt relief providers who prefer not to require consumers to pay substantial up - front fees at a competitive disadvantage.
Based on my experience
in covering stories about
debt settlement abusive practices it seems like the advance fee ban initiated by the FTC goes a long way to protect consumers but is not so hard and fast that there are not some small allowances given to
debt relief providers.
For
debt relief providers that think they will be able to make savings claims
in general, that's not going to fly.
Last week, FTC staff attorney Michelle Grajales presented an up - close compliance update to
debt - service
providers at the Association for Student Loan
Relief Conference
in Las Vegas.
if the
debt relief provider requests or requires the customer to place funds
in a dedicated bank account, that the customer owns the funds held
in the account and may withdraw from the
debt relief service at any time without penalty, and receive all funds remitted to the account.
While the TSR says that
debt relief providers may require the consumer to place funds
in a dedicated bank account a larger issue will arise when the
providers of such banking services, like NoteWorld and Global Client Solutions, will have a specific duty to make sure they are working only with
debt relief providers that comply with the TSR.
One of the allegations
in the ongoing battle between
debt relief providers Frank Linder, Esq. of FBL Associates and Evan Kagan, Esq. is the allegation that customer data was stolen from FBL Associates and utilized by the...
As discussed
in detail
in this SBP, the Final Rule addresses deceptive and abusive practices of
debt relief service
providers and includes the following elements: