At Skeptical Science, our goal is to
debunk false arguments and explain the science behind climate change.
And here is the thing; scientists are also not required to
debunk every false argument; science is not a sport where one side wins by default if the other side doesn't show up.
Not exact matches
But first, nothing so far has been «thrashed» or «
debunked» in that article, starting form completely
false statement (and non-sequitur
argument) like: