The new thesis partially
debunks the argument that the long gap on the emergence of complex organisms was due to the slow evolution process.
Kreutzer then
debunks the argument that conservatives should support a «revenue neutral» carbon tax that displaces EPA regulation of greenhouse gases:
«Long - term global warming not driven naturally: Study
debunks argument that warming is driven by natural factors.»
(WBEN) During the region's first weekend with ridesharing, DWI arrests in Erie County rose slightly, but county officials say that doesn't necessarily
debunk the argument that Uber and Lyft can help reduce drunk driving.
(NCTQ does a nice job
debunking that argument here.)
Abbott also
debunked arguments presented by the Texas Association of School Boards (TASB) where they claimed «overlap» between Common Core and the TEKS as an issue, suggesting that «if teachers can not use the Common Core Standards «in any way,» it will result in an inability to teach many of the required TEKS.»
Although, by
debunking this argument, you give it more strength.
Will and Novak have already had their shot at countering the Time article, and rather than raising legitimate points where clarification could have been useful, they squandered their chance on baseless character assassination and rehashing of already
debunked arguments.
At the moment, it seems you have simply skimmed (at best) the article rather than studying the arguments and source material, then launched in with already
debunked arguments.
I see the same ridiculous, already
debunked arguments used by anti-AGW people on this forum every time one of these articles comes up.
«Instead, the coal lobby has sought an urgent interdict to delay the conclusion of power purchase agreements, citing already -
debunked arguments relating to job losses, coal power station closures and rising electricity prices.»
We have a lot of work to do so if you want to reject the science and regurgitate long -
debunked arguments against global warming, go elsewhere.
In this speech, I really wanted
debunk this argument I had heard over the years from some of my fellow Toastmasters: «We should not take any action on climate change until China cleans up its pollution.»
In January, 2012, Levant featured Timothy Ball on his show and discussed Ball's belief that there has been no global warming since 1998,
a debunked argument that has long been popular with climate change skeptics.
Just an aside to this topic, but what tends to push me towards irritable language most is the endless reiteration of
debunked arguments, frequently by the same commenter, often only moments after the debunking.
If not, and «skeptics» go back to long -
debunked arguments of climate sensitivity below 1 C / doubling, then why would any scientist even want to look at Lewis» unpublished back - of - the - envelope calculations?
, quotes out of context, repeating the same tired
debunked arguments year after year... The only difference is that the ideology behind it is a little more popular — the strawman liberal is apparently a more plausible villain to most people than the strawman atheist.
However, beyond the relevance of this work toward
debunking the arguments expressed in the Wegman report, which is non-trivial, it is important that climate scientists not be the lone punching bags in this public drama.
It's a truism that whenever I write about the solid fact that the Earth is warming up, that post will get comments that make it clear that denialists — and please read that link before commenting on my use of the word — are like religious zealots, writing the same tired long -
debunked arguments that are usually debunked in the very post they're commenting on.
Just a heads up, calling someone biased and then attempting to
debunk their argument using an Androidcentral link that quotes an executive in charge of Android security might not be the best way to tackle your grievances with this article.
Not exact matches
WLF's brief also
debunks the agency's
argument for Article III standing.
I have to admit, that's a new
argument, I expected him to rattle off all the stupidity that's easily
debunked from his website.
Third your pathetic Discovery Insti.tute intelligent design anti-evolution
arguments have all been
debunked many times.
That separate but equal
argument really was
debunked as being viable a few decades ago.
Kirk has done a great service in
debunking a whole range of pseudo-scholarly lines of
argument in one slim volume.
Sorry, to disappoint, but that should
debunk the rest of your
argument.
It just seems to me that as a writer / researcher who clearly knows better, it is really your job to attack,
debunk and tear these assinine
arguments about Obama's religious convictions to pieces rather than giving them some kind of legitimacy.
@ grassroots: I would like to believe that you were sincere in claiming that atheists have a ``... duty (as if being responsible to some authority) to
debunk...» (I presume you to mean a belief in God) ``... via the Internet... [etc]», but when you mix sarcasm with rationality, then you lose creditability with me because you join the ranks of those who just want to poke fun at believers for entertainment and invite a heated
argument with no intentions of converting such people.
I heard the same
arguments debunked by Bruxy Cavey.
It's all the same empty
arguments that evolutionists has been making which has been
debunked time and again.
His
arguments are devoid of facts, and his masquerade as a scientist, or whatever, is galling» «attempting to
debunk the integrity of the bible, and glorify the theory of evolution is simply a tactic to lure unsuspecting seekers to abandon reason and science in order to embrace an illogical, unverifiable, subjective based explanation of the universe.
Are you aware that the whole low fat = healthy
argument has been
debunked?
Just maybe that it's more productive for your
argument if it wasn't one - dimensional, insulting, and so narrow so as to be easily
debunked by literally anyone showing a video where he played well for a game.
Having said that... For one of the «reasons» not to microwave formula, you cited, «it creates hot spots,» and
debunked with and
argument about convection currents in liquid.
They come in waving various
arguments about as if these are new and special
arguments, and the people who are regulars on the boards sigh and prepare to
debunk Pascal's Wager for the eleventy - millionth time.
This
argument was widely
debunked by the Electoral Commission, the Public Administration Select Committee and former Ministers and the government was defeated.
David Cameron has said he wants to
debunk some of the «duff»
arguments used by those hostile to the European Union.
«The science here is being used as a proxy for a lot of different things,» he said, noting that
debunking the fallacies in the Galileo Movement's
argument won't change the group's prevailing politics.
As U.S. senators are considering whether to support background checks on people purchasing guns, Shermer uses simple figures to
debunk a number of popular
arguments used to oppose gun control.
Citing peer - reviewed material on Skeptical Science, science reporter Chris Mooney re-examines how Soon's primary
argument is
debunked, for the Washington Post:
Regular readers of JPGB and Education Next have seen this
argument debunked before, but I feel compelled to do it again in response to a sloppy and lazy article in the Wall Street Journal.
«This book pulls together the powerful and decisive
arguments that
debunk myths of the failure of US schools.
It also seeks to
debunk a parallel
argument by state schools chief Diane Douglas that the teachers have abandoned their jobs, meaning their teaching certificates can be suspended or revoked by the state Board of Education.
This
argument was completely
debunked by Caroline M. Hoxby, an Associate Professor of Economics at Harvard, during an interview with PBS's Frontline.
It's been
debunked repeatedly by respected analysts, so using it as the basis for any of your
arguments is a game - loser from the beginning.
Perhaps one of the more compelling
arguments debunking the myth is to point out that cat colony caregivers are not suffering from health problems caused by cats.
Using the media as an outlet for education, we hope to raise the level of awareness on important issues such as pet overpopulation and dog fighting, as well as
debunking the unfounded, illogical and fear - based
arguments that all too often lead to breed - specific bans and the heartbreaking extermination of beautiful animals whose only crime is having been born.
As far as the power
argument goes and MS building for the future, I think Nintendo has already
debunked that theory.
Maybe because you really didn't know that all these alternative
arguments have been long
debunked and the denial world merely makes up new irrelevant
arguments in order to show that there is still debate?
Is there a way to show enough respect to the opposing
argument to engage people so that the litany of skeptical
arguments that are tossed about can be sequentially addressed and put respectively into the camps of «confirmed», «need further research» and «
debunked»?