Sentences with phrase «decarbonisation by»

Allowing dirty tar sands to flood into Europe is going to raise emissions - not lower them - and raise the costs of decarbonisation by billions of euros.

European drivers will be forced to fill up their tanks with tar sands that will raise emissions — not lower them — and push up the costs of decarbonisation by billions of euros,» added Laura Buffet of Transport & Environment.

Benefits from reduced externalities exceed the costs of decarbonisation by a factor of between two and six, with health benefits from reduced air pollution alone exceeding the costs.

Within the ten points of the «joint appeal,» number four demands a goal of «complete decarbonisation by mid-century.»

Not exact matches

In June 2013, Conservative MP Tim Yeo and Barry Gardiner jointly tabled an amendment to the UK Energy Bill which proposed establishing by 2014 a decarbonisation target for the UK's electricity generating sector, to be achieved by 2030.

Farron's move in a letter to a constituent released at the weekend came as the IPPR thinktank published new research showing the proposed decarbonisation target need not increase energy prices, and the government's alternative of relying on gas will boost bills by as much as # 15.

MPs have an historic chance to deliver that certainty in the form of a decarbonisation target to be set by 2014.

Much has been made of the need for a decarbonisation target, a measure that, if included in the Energy Bill, would drive investment to slash the carbon intensity of UK electricity production by 2030, bringing with it huge jobs and growth benefits to many corners of the UK.

The party said a 2030 decarbonisation target supported by Labour would mean a rise of that scale over the next 17 years.

«The success of China's decarbonisation path is keenly observed by the international community.

But climate activists in Bonn and elsewhere said the G7 recognition that decarbonisation of the global economy was needed «over the course of this century» was too slow, arguing it should happen by 2050 instead.

«The criteria for judging INDCs is their capacity to unleash the deep decarbonisation of the energy sector by 2050.

In order to get back on track with decarbonisation of the electricity sector in a manageable way, policymakers across the EU will have to address this market failure by turning the focus from subsidies back to the emissions trading system.

Decarbonisation of the global economy can not be achieved by improving energy efficiency.

It is also closer in line with the goals of the EU, such as cutting carbon emissions by at least 20 % by 2020 and by 80 - 95 % by 2050, and the agreed «no regrets options» for the long term decarbonisation of the energy sector: more efficiency, more renewables, and more and smarter grids.

Commendably, the country is making polluters pay by using a CO2 tax for financing decarbonisation efforts in space heating.

The BLUE Map scenario is very challenging for the transport sector and requires significant decarbonisation of transport, which is likely to be costly in a sector dominated by oil products and the internal combustion engine.

Our recent study with ClimateWorks Australia on Deep Decarbonisation Pathways, which built on modelling by CSIRO and Victoria University, showed that Australia can cut emissions deeply and do so while maintaining strong economic growth.

Others will make the case for reducing the fossil fuel exposure of investment portfolios by decarbonisation.

It's a laudable aim, but decarbonisation can and should be done by the middle, not the end, of this century.

These two Directives combined set binding targets for 10 % renewable energy in transport fuel by 2020 and the decarbonisation of transport fuels by 6 % by 2020.

While many challenges remain, it is difficult not to be optimistic about the potential for change that has been opened by decarbonisation, decentralisation and digitalisation in an overall context of electrification of final demand as outlined in the latest energy scenarios published by the Council.

Hence the need for a fallback position — an environmental theory which would justify the massively expensive and disruptive ongoing decarbonisation programme so assiduously championed by politicians, scientists, green campaigners and anyone making money out of the renewables business.

Then of course there was «The Hartwell Paper» — with some real heavyweights behind it: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27939/ Suggesting that the modification of «consumer behaviour by settling a carbon price» was necessary to achieve «radical decarbonisation» and should be «priced as high as is politically acceptable».

Challenging AGW on the Eve of Destruction Guest essay by Uli Weber, Geophysicist, Germany Since the G7 - summit at Elmau Castle (2015) and the climate summit COP21 in Paris (2015) the declared political aim of all governments of the world is a global decarbonisation until the year 2100 to save our planet from anthropogenic global warming -LSB-...]

Decarbonisation rate function — This is given little attention by carbon tax advocates.

He also said, «The agreement and the decisions surrounding it needs to be a long term development plan providing the policies, pathways and finance for triggering a peaking of global emissions in 10 years» time followed by a deep, decarbonisation of the global economy by the second half of the century — a development plan that crucially also supports the growth as well as the climate ambitions of developing countries.»

Through regional co-operation, the Nordic countries can achieve a near carbon - neutral energy system by 2050, while contributing to European decarbonisation through the export of clean electricity.

Let's start with the first D: decarbonisation is driven by a powerful combination of policy and market forces.

Comprehensive Policy Package for Decarbonisation of the Estonian Electricity Production by 2050.

As a firm we are passionate about the opportunities created by decarbonisation.