But is silent in the event that
we decarbonize now at some massive (even fatal to the world's poorest) cost, and it turns out AGW is much less than catastrophic.
Not exact matches
We have to
decarbonize, not just because of carbon dioxide and climate change in the longer term, but because it is killing us directly right
now.
In a combination of sarcasm and anger they pointed out that it was a great target but it meant
decarbonizing our economy and our societies
now, immediately.
The call to
decarbonize the global economy by 80 % by 2050 can
now only be described as glib in my opinion, as the underlying analysis shows it is only possible if we wish to see large parts of the population die from starvation, destitution or violence in the absence of enough low - carbon energy to sustain society.
In a soon - to - be-published research paper,
now in peer review, Jenkins and a group of MIT engineers have modeled and priced «deeply
decarbonized» electric systems that would make the global CO2 reductions both technically and economically viable.
«All other sectors are
decarbonizing right
now.
I
now vote for
decarbonizing the global energy economy.
His belief is
now what it was then — that if skeptics can not
now disprove CAGW, then governments should begin
decarbonizing the global economy.