There is much demand for organs and a shortage of
deceased organ donations.
Not exact matches
At a conference on transplantation last year sponsored by the American College of Legal Medicine, Thomas Starzl endorsed a policy of presumed consent, which allows physicians to retrieve
organs unless the
deceased opted out by specifically stating an opposition to
organ donation prior to death.
The AST and ASTS leaders have conceived an «arc of change» that starts with immediate work to remove all financial disincentives to
organ donation for both living and
deceased donors.
The research team identified potential
deceased donors based on specific criteria such as a ventilated inpatient death of a patient 75 years or younger, without multi-
organ system failure, sepsis, or cancer, and whose cause of death was consistent with
organ donation — which includes neurologic determination of death (DNDD) or circulatory determination of death (DCDD).
Based on the results, researchers suggest two new metrics, which should be standardized, for measuring OPO performance: evaluating
donation percentage — the percentage of possible
deceased - donors who become actual donors — and tracking
organs transplanted per possible donor.
The researchers note that these data alone do not capture all potential
deceased organ donors in the U.S., as the current definition of an eligible death excludes potential donors over age 70, and those classified as a «
donation after cardiac death» donor, both of which broaden the pool of available donors.
The NPRM's proposed approach did not differentiate between situations in which the donor was competent to consent to the
donation — for example, when an individual is donating blood, sperm, a kidney, or a liver or lung lobe — and situations in which the donor was
deceased, for example, when cadaveric
organs and tissues were being donated.