Sentences with phrase «deceptive practices rules»

But you may not know this: Zillow is in hot water with the federal government over alleged violations of anti-kickback and deceptive practices rules.

Not exact matches

Making such promises and failing to live up to them is a violation of FTC rules against unfair and deceptive business practices,» EFF Staff Attorney Nate Cardozo said.

The ruling more widely cements the agency's power to regulate and fine firms that lose consumer data to hackers, if the companies engaged in what the FTC deems «unfair» or «deceptive» business practices.

This order concerns violations by Southwest Airlines Co. (Southwest) of the full - fare advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84 (a), and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns advertisements published by Compania Mexicana de Aviacion S.A. de C.V. (Mexicana) that failed to comply with the Department's rule on full fare advertising, 14 CFR 399.84, and thereby violated the statutory proscription in 49 U.S.C. § 41712 against unfair and deceptive practices.

This consent order concerns violations by Frontier Airlines, Inc., of 14 CFR 259.4 (the Department's tarmac delay rule), 49 U.S.C. § 41712 (prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices), and 49 U.S.C. § 42301 (requirement to adhere to a carrier's tarmac delay contingency plan).

This consent order concerns violations by Airtrade International, Inc., (Airtrade) an online airline ticket agent, of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by AirGorilla, LLC, (AirGorilla), an online airline ticket agent, of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by BusinessJet Class, LLC (BusinessJet), an online airline ticket agent, of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257 and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by American Travel Solutions, LLC (ATS), an online airline ticket agent, of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by Fareportal, Inc. (Fareportal), an online airline ticket agent, of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This notice is intended to give further guidance to air carriers and other sellers of air transportation on how those additional taxes, fees, and restrictions that are permitted to be listed separately from a fare quotation may be disclosed in advertisements.1 This guidance will be used by the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings in its compliance and enforcement activities associated with 14 CFR 399.84, the Department's full fare advertising rule, and 49 U.S.C. 41712, which prohibits unfair and deceptive practices.

1 his consent order concerns acfvertislng of air transportation by i iiCX international Airlines, S.A. (TACA), a foreign air carrier, that violated the Department's full tare advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84 and constituted an unfair and deceptive practice and an unfair method of competition in violation ok 4Y U.S.C. § 41712.

This order concerns violations by AirTran Airways, Inc., (AirTran) of the full fare advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84 (a), and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns fare displays by Southern Sky Air & Tours, LLC d / b / a Myrtle Beach Direct Air & Tours, (Direct Air) a U.S. Public Charter operator, on its website and in other print and Internet advertisements that failed to comply with the Department's rule on full fare advertising, 14 CFR 399.84, and therefore constituted an unfair and deceptive practice and unfair method of competition in violation of 14 CFR 380.27 and 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns advertisements by Gate 1, Ltd., (Gate 1) a ticket agent, that violated 14 CFR 399.84 the Department's rule on full - fare advertising, and 49 U.S.C. § 41712, which prohibits unfair and deceptive practices by air carriers and ticket agents.

This order concerns violations by Vision Airlines, Inc., (Vision) of the Department's full - fare advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84, as well as 49 U.S.C. § 41712, which prohibits carriers from engaging in unfair and deceptive practices.

This consent order concerns radio advertisements by Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana, S.A., (Iberia Airlines) that fded to comply with the Department's rule on fare advertising, 14 CFR 399.84, and thereby violated the statutory proscription in 49 U.S.C. § 41712 against unfair and deceptive practices.

This consent order concerns violations by US Airways, Inc., of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by United Air Lines, Inc., (United) of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns Internet advertisements by Globester, LLC (Globester), that violated the Department's full - fare advertising requirements specified in 14 CFR Part 399, the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

Violations («Northwest») of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This notice is intended to provide guidance on two matters related to compliance with 14 CFR 399.84, the Department's rule on full fare advertising, and the underlying statutory proscription in 49 U.S.C. § 41712 against unfair and deceptive trade practices.

This consent order concerns violations by American Airlines, Inc., (American) of the Department's refund rules, 14 CFR 259.5 (b)(5) and 14 CFR Part 374, and the statutory prohibition on unfair and deceptive practice, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

Further, the court concluded that the rule properly regulates airline cancellation policies because existing airline cancellation and refund practices were deceptive and unfair, and that the regulation was «plainly allowed» under DOT's statute that targets unfair and deceptive practices.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today fined ticket agent Airtrade International, doing business as Vayama, $ 80,000 for violating DOT's unfair and deceptive trade practices rule by advertising fares that failed to distinguish between government taxes and fees and charges imposed by the airline.

Fortunately, the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) now protects consumers from deceptive or abusive practices in the telemarketing of these agencies.

A new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rule is aimed at cracking down on mortgage relief companies that make use deceptive practices.

In the motion, Navient laid out three arguments as to why the case should be thrown out including that the CFPB didn't establish rules defining what behaviors fell in the categories of unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices for student loan servicers.

Any loan broker or loan officers of any loan broker that violate any provision of this Title or any rule issued by the administrator, or that through any unfair, unconscionable or deceptive practice cause actual damage to a consumer, are subject to the following: [2005, c. 683, Pt.

[FN61] A violation of FDUTPA is defined as any violation of FDUTPA, or may be predicated upon violations of any rules promulgated pursuant to the FTC act, any standards of unfairness or deception set forth by the FTC or the federal courts, or any law, statute, or other provision which proscribes unfair methods of competition, or unfair, deceptive, or unconscionable acts or practices.

Any loan broker or loan officers of any loan broker that violate any provision of this Title or any rule issued by the administrator, or that through any unfair, unconscionable or deceptive practice cause actual damage to a consumer, are subject to the following:

(The Commission's decision to amend the Rule is made pursuant to the rulemaking authority granted by the Telemarketing Act to protect consumers from deceptive and abusive practices.

Where the FTC missed the target was when they said the new rules did not apply to secured debt because they felt «There is no evidence in the record of deceptive or abusive practices in the promotion of services for the relief of non-mortgage secured debt» but they appear to have missed the recent influx of auto loan modification companies that are springing up.

If the trade associations decide to band together to challenge the new FTC rules in court, it appears clear it will be seen by regulators and others as nothing more than a desperate attempt of an industry whose members have been labeled as engaging in deceptive and abusive practices to continue those bad acts.

Specifically, the Act directed the Commission to issue a rule defining and prohibiting deceptive and abusive telemarketing acts or practices.

As discussed in detail in this SBP, the Final Rule addresses deceptive and abusive practices of debt relief service providers and includes the following elements:

The FTC has adopted final rules to protect consumers from deceptive advertising and abusive business practices by the debt settlement industry;

You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services or the Sites to take any actions that: (i) infringe on any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, discriminatory based on race, ethnicity, gender, sex or disability, pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on the Animal League or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN - SPAM Act of 2003); (vii) would encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, federal or international laws, rules or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interfere with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of the Animal League's or other's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other Animal League members, Site users or attempt to gain access to other Animal League members information, or otherwise mine information about Animal League members, Site users, or the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) are contrary to the Animal League's public image, goodwill, reputation or mission or otherwise not in furtherance of the Animal Leagues stated purposes.

Given that it is the compact of this Board with the State of Texas to protect the people of Texas, and whereby it is provided in the Texas Administrative Code Title 22, Part 24, Chapter 577, Subchapter B, Rule 577.16: Responsibilities of the Board (a) The Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners is responsible for establishing policies and promulgating rules to establish and maintain a high standard of integrity, skills, and practice in the profession of Veterinary medicine in accordance with the Veterinary Licensing Act, I hereby assert that the Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners must take demonstrated and thorough action to stop the deceptive trade practices and fraud in the marketing of vaccinations for companion animals.

«As with all bar regulation, the rules sound benign enough in practice — protecting consumers from deceptive practices and preventing lawyers from acting like undignified hucksters.

In an order ruling on the defendant's motion to dismiss, the U.S. District Court dismissed some of the claims, but denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the claims that allege false advertising, tortious interference with contract, trade libel and deceptive trade practices.

He said there's a «strong possibility» that Facebook violated its consent decree while Cambridge Analytica violated federal rules that prohibit unfair, deceptive acts or practices.

In addition, the FTC will continue to enforce the Rule and Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive practices, against all other providers of mortgage assistance relief services.