You wrote, «Harlequin can take a very long time to
decide about manuscripts.
Not exact matches
As for peer review, it means only that reasonably qualified scientists examined the
manuscript and recommended changes to improve the paper, or recommended that the paper be rejected; the journal editor has to make a determination
about the merits of the paper based largely, but not entirely on the reviewers» comments (the editor has some discretion in
deciding to accept or reject — his / her reputation as an editor, and the reputation of the journal, depend on sound editorial judgments).
Stumbling upon J.A. Konrath's blog
about self - publishing, she
decided to release her completed
manuscripts independently.
And then I started reading
about authors that were doing it on their own and though it was scary for me because I thought I might be throwing away a possible career in traditional publishing if I went ahead and self - published myself, I just finally
decided that I would take to a book five
manuscripts I've already written and publish them, see how it went.»
But the reason that we have
decided to do some diagnostics comes from a number of questions we had
about the
manuscript: