Sentences with phrase «decide on a child custody»

When deciding on child custody matters, state courts put the best interests of the child first and foremost when making their rulings.

Deciding on child custody arrangements can be a difficult and emotional process.

This has led to big changes in the overall climate of child custody in Texas, because now everything is very much geared up to avoid having to go to court in order to decide on child custody matters, and instead a more collegiate approach is the norm, where all parties are encouraged to get around the table and mutually agree on what visitations would work best for the child.

Not exact matches

(And if men are so upset by things like spousal support and child custody, why don't they just get a prenup so they can decide for themselves who gets what instead of relying on the state's prenup?)

Here's how to identify the issue and decide on the best way to tackle it without violating your child custody agreement.

This rule has been phased out in almost every state, and instead, judges must decide on the merits of the case which parent having custody would be in the best interests of the child.

Courts deciding visitation and other custody issues focus on the best interest of the child.

When Harge attempts to win sole custody of their child by attacking Carol's moral fiber, solely on the basis of her affairs with women, Carol decides to temporarily flee New York with Therese in tow, unaware of the lengths Harge will go to in order to ruin any chance of happiness for her.

However, if no agreement can be reached, a judge will decide custody rights based on the best interest of the child.

The matter was decided just as the Children's Law Reform Act had been amended to impose additional requirements on non-parents applying for custody of a child.

Depending on the child custody arrangement that the parties agree to when they decide to live separately, one parent may be responsible for ensuring that they provide financial support through child support payments to the other parent.

When parents can't agree on child custody, a judge will decide.

In this case, the court held that even when parties initially elect to submit a custody dispute to an arbitrator or to the friend of the court, they can not waive the authority that the Child Custody Act confers on the circuit court to decide the best interests of the child as it relates to ccustody dispute to an arbitrator or to the friend of the court, they can not waive the authority that the Child Custody Act confers on the circuit court to decide the best interests of the child as it relates to cusChild Custody Act confers on the circuit court to decide the best interests of the child as it relates to cCustody Act confers on the circuit court to decide the best interests of the child as it relates to cuschild as it relates to custodycustody.

Child custody and access in Canada is decided entirely on the best interests of the cChild custody and access in Canada is decided entirely on the best interests of the childchild.

Rather than engaging in adversarial litigation and ultimately letting a judge decide issues of child custody, child and spousal support, and property division, parties can use mediation to reach agreements on these significant and emotional issues.

When determining parental visitation, child custody, and allocation of parental responsibilities, the courts will decide the most suitable option, based on the best interests of the child.

Custody shall be considered to be exercised jointly when, pursuant to a judgment or by operation of law, one holder of parental responsibility can not decide on the child's place of residence without the consent of another holder of parental responsibility.

For those filing on or after October 12, 2010, you should be aware that this divorce can not be granted for this reason until after issues regarding spousal support and property, as well as custody, visitation and child support have been settled between you and your spouse or decided by the court.

While it is always best if parents can mutually agree on a workable schedule for their family, a family court judge may decide where children will live if the parents can not agree on primary custody and visitation.

If the parents can not agree on custody of their child, the courts decide custody based on «the best interests of the child.»

Not necessarily - most states require their courts to decide which parent should receive custody based solely on the basis of the best interests of the children, without the parent's gender playing a role in the decision.

As the Ontario Court of Appeal in Balev v Bagott, 2016 ONCA 680 (CanLII) recalled, applications pursuant to the Hague Convention do not determine custody or decide on what would be in the best interest of the child.

The court will decide these kinds of custody and access issues by considering the «best interests» of the children and in most cases it will be found to be in the children's interests to be allowed to go on a vacation with either spouse.

In deciding custody, the Vermont court considers history of abuse and the impact of that abuse on the child and on the relationship between the child and the abusing parent.

Courts decide custody issues based on the best interests of the child standard and permit children 12 and older to express a preference.

The courts tend to look at child support and custody as separate issues, and they will certainly not decide the custody situation based on its potential effect on child support.

Florida courts, like most family courts around the country, decide child custody issues based on the best interests of a child.

When a Georgia court must decide custody and visitation because parents can't agree on a parenting plan, judges fall back on a statutory list of factors based on the best interests of the children.

Children often benefit when their parents can divorce amicably by using a settlement agreement instead of allowing a court to decide on divorce terms like child custody.

When it comes to deciding custody in divorce, courts in both Texas and North Carolina, as in all states, base their decision on what is in the best interest of the child.

Where appropriate, a court will decide on issues such as custody of children and division of property.

When it comes to deciding issues of custody and parenting time, the courts must focus on the best interests of the children.

When parents disagree on terms of raising a child, the court intervenes and decides custody of the child.

When a court decides child custody as part of a divorce, it does so based on the best interests of the child.

The court intervenes and decides custody based on the best interests of the child when the parents are unable to do it.

The court decides custody issues on what it believes the child requires, not on what the parents desire.

At the hearing, the judge will decide temporary custody based on the same factors he will use to determine a more permanent parenting plan — what he considers to be in the best interests of your children.

When it adopted the Family Law Act in 1969, the Legislature specified that custody disputes between parents must be decided exclusively on the basis of the child's «best interest.»

Getting a divorce usually takes a toll on both the parents and their children, but one of the hardest part of a separation is deciding on who will get custody of the kids.

In a separation, the courts enter orders deciding custody of the children based on the gold standard of child welfare - the best interests of the child, whether or not the parents or guardians agree.

The court decides custody based on the best interests of a child, which means consideration of the relationship between the child and each parent, the ability of each parent to care for the child, the child's preference, mental and physical health of all parties, and any history of domestic violence.

While one can not put a value on one's child, parents getting divorced must remember that no one «wins» or «loses» custody; rather, the judge must decide how much time the children spend with each parent, for except in extremely rare cases does any parent «lose» his or her children in divorce.

When the court decides on the issue of child custody and visitation, the gender of the parents is not considered.

Leaning on his erroneous premise of «equality,» Sacks criticizes Wilson's point that «ninety percent of parents settle without the need for court intervention in deciding what form of custody is best for them and for their children.»

When divorcing spouses are unable to work together, however, the court must step in decide custody based on the best interests of the child.

Divorce: A Divorce Agreement, or Marriage Settlement Agreement, is used when the couple has agreed on all the issues and decided on how to split their property, control, and custody of any children.

In deciding to award custody to plaintiff, the court also significantly relied on its finding that prior to the marital discord the children had a close relationship with both parents but that, thereafter, defendant «embarked on [a] course of conduct which in effect alienated the affection and love which the children had naturally developed for [plaintiff].»

You must also divide your property and decide on important issues including: debts, assets, child custody, child visitation, child support, and alimony.

Custody is decided based on the best interests of your children.

In Nebraska, child support payments are decided based on how much physical custody time each parent has.