Similarly, in Erdmann v Complaints Inquiry Committee, 2016 ABCA 145 (CanLII), Justices Jack Watson, Bruce McDonald and Frederica Schutz dismissed an appeal of a professional disciplinary body's
decision against the appellant, where she had been found guilty of three counts of unprofessional conduct as a chartered accountant and ordered to pay fines and costs.
Not exact matches
The Appellate court in its judgment delivered by Justice H.A.O Abiru upheld the
decision of the lower court and resolved all issues raised
against the
appellant.
Case Wind Farm Location Year Type
Decision Town of Falmouth v. Town of Falmouth Zoning Board of Appeals & others Falmouth Massachusetts 2013 Higher
Against wind farm Lawrence J. Frigault et al., Respondents -
Appellants, v. Town of Richfield Planning Board et...
While an insurance contract can be said to contemplate potential accidents, any claim for underinsured, uninsured or unidentified coverage «only arises in the aftermath of the tort and its application is conditional on the outcome of the
appellant's claim
against the tortfeasors,» the
decision notes.
A majority of the Court of Appeal (Justices Bruce McDonald and Barbara Lea Veldhuis) upheld the case management judge's
decision striking the
appellant's statement of claim in relation to a motor vehicle accident and issuing an order for costs
against him.
A firm of accountants appealed
against a
decision of the Court of Appeal in which it was decided that the accountants owed a duty of care to the
appellant shareholders when producing an audit report required by statute.
The
Appellant appeals from a summary judgment
decision dismissing her action
against the Respondents, Toronto Police Services Board and Detective Constable Andrew MacPhail, for wrongful arrest and negligent investigation of criminal charges.
The Law Society also argued that the public would question the regulation of paralegals if a stay were granted when two panel
decisions had found
against the
appellant and he conceded that he had made serious misrepresentations in his registration application.
CMA Nurseries Ltd v Secretary of State for Education (2015) Successfully represented the
appellant Orthodox Jewish School in an appeal
against the SSE's
decision to remove it from the register of independent schools.
The
appellant appealed
against both
decisions.
In this case the first and second
appellant appealed
against a
decision refusing them permission to instruct independent experts in care proceedings regarding their child.
The Court of Appeal is not necessarily precluded from hearing appeals by the secretary of state for work and pensions on jurisdictional points
against a
decision of a social security commissioner, notwithstanding the fact that he was the successful
appellant before the commissioner; a social security commissioner does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a legally qualified panel member who has refused to extend time or who has struck out a proposed appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Roger ter Haar QC, who acted for the successful
appellant Mr Jones
against Dr Kaney, said: «Often things go drastically wrong during expert meetings and you can't undo the damage done by cross-examining on the
decision making process.»
Those methods do not resolve difficult legal cases, but merely conceal the true springs of
decision in such a case, which involve a careful examination of the practical consequences of a
decision for or
against the
appellant.