Control over admissions may well have been a factor but we don't have to guess whether bureaucratic burdens and testing requirements played a major part in
the decision by private schools in FL and LA not to participate.
Not exact matches
These are some of the principles on which the
schools of thought based their
decisions: all things are fundamentally allowable, unless specifically prohibited; toleration and the lifting of restrictions should be the aim of legislation; eradication of mischief is the aim of administration; necessity permits benefiting
by things not otherwise allowable; necessity is given due appreciation; preventing mischief has priority over bringing about welfare; commit the lesser of two evils; mischief is not removed
by mischief; one should suffer
private damage to avert general disaster.
Thus in many southern cities
private academies, established to circumvent the Supreme Court's
decision ordering the end of
school segregation, have been founded
by churches.
But observers in St. Paul believe two recent developments may create a favorable climate for the concept: the U.S. Supreme Court
decision upholding the state's 25 - year - old system of income - tax deductions for expenses incurred
by families with children in
private and public
schools, and the endorsement of a generalized voucher...
An education voucher is essentially a scholarship that goes directly to the
private school by way of parental
decisions.
The federal appeals court in St. Louis — directly contradicting a two - year - old
decision by its counterpart in Boston — has upheld a Minnesota law allowing parents of
private -
school students to take state income - tax deductions for tuition and other expenses.
That right vouchsafes to families the options of
private schooling and home
schooling but not of no
schooling, for it is balanced
by «high duty» and
by the «power of the state,» as recognized in the same Court
decision, to «reasonably to regulate all
schools, to inspect, supervise and examine them, their teachers and pupils; to require that all children of proper age attend some
school, that teachers shall be of good moral character and patriotic disposition, that certain studies plainly essential to good citizenship must be taught, and that nothing be taught which is manifestly inimical to the public welfare» (emphasis added).
A
decision by the East Lansing Public
Schools to recruit additional students, for example, may mean fewer students and less revenue for nearby public, private, or charter s
Schools to recruit additional students, for example, may mean fewer students and less revenue for nearby public,
private, or charter
schoolsschools.
School systems — public and
private - should continue to make allocation
decisions based on their superior local knowledge and administrative capacity, but should be guided
by the new model and be fully transparent and accountable.
DOJ attorneys at the end of May dropped their representation of state Superintendent Tony Evers in a lawsuit brought
by a
private religious
school and the parents of students there against a Washington County
school district and the DPI over a
decision to refuse to provide the students transportation to the
school.
By leaving the Third Circuit's
decision intact, the Court failed to alleviate the risk of increased
school district liability for
private school tuition and prolonged litigation that drains
schools» limited financial and educational resources away from serving all children.
DOJ attorneys at the end of May dropped their representation of state Superintendent Tony Evers in a lawsuit brought
by a
private religious
school and the parents of students there against a Washington County
school district and DPI over a
decision to refuse to provide the students transportation to the
school.
Asked whether he was confident that the
private schools funded
by vouchers are better than the public
schools students would otherwise attend, Jindal told POLITICO that parents, not government officials, should make that
decision.
Even more shocking was Gov. Jay Nixon's
decision that same month to veto legislation co-authored
by his arch-nemesis, Rep. Maria Chappelle - Nadal, that would have allowed for kids in failing districts to attend higher - quality public and
private schools in the area shows the callousness of state officials when it comes to providing kids with high - quality educational options.
And in 2015, in the 4 - 3 Hart v. State
decision written
by Chief Justice Mark Martin, the majority upheld a
school voucher program that allows taxpayer dollars to fund tuition for
private schools that have virtually no legal obligation to provide students with even a basic education.
By extending
school districts» obligation to pay for
private school placements until all appeals are exhausted, the
decision creates an incentive for parents to prolong litigation rather than to work collaboratively with
school districts to resolve disputes without delay; the increased liability for
private tuition and legal fees from needlessly prolonged litigation imposes an untenable burden on the already - strained budgets of local
school districts and diverts resources away from providing educational services to all children.
Student loans give college students the flexibility to choose the type of
school that is right for them and,
by allowing the students to defer repayment while in
school, the government and
private lenders encourage students to manage their own educational
decisions and increase access to a college diploma.
Upset
by the high
school administration's
decision to cancel a band contest, Connecticut high
school senior Avery Doninger referred to the administrators as «douchebags» on her
private blog.
[2] This appeal results from a judicial review of the Minister's
decision to deny an exemption sought
by a
private, Catholic
school.
The 2018 BCCA
decision of Stewart and Ferguson dealt with an appeal of a variation of child support for the parties» 14 - year old son made originally
by a family arbitrator beacause the son had been accepted into a
private boarding
school.
where the children will primarily live, how often each parent will see the children, what
schools and extra-curricular activities the children will attend, etc.) can often be more flexible and beneficial to the children than
decisions imposed
by the Court or a
private arbitrator;