Sentences with phrase «decision by some franchisees»

The terminations are due to serious breaches or non-compliance or a decision by some franchisees to prematurely end their contracts after refusing to participate in the audit.

Not exact matches

While we may introduce you to lenders who have offered financing to Crunch franchisees the decision on who to lend to is made by the lender and being a Crunch franchisee is no guarantee or promise that you will obtain financing or any level of financing.

By using a franchise model, Sherpa Kids not only benefits from the local knowledge of the provider, it also contributes to the economic and employment prospects of local communities since all decision - making is done at local level by owners and franchisees are encouraged to source products locallBy using a franchise model, Sherpa Kids not only benefits from the local knowledge of the provider, it also contributes to the economic and employment prospects of local communities since all decision - making is done at local level by owners and franchisees are encouraged to source products locallby owners and franchisees are encouraged to source products locally.

By using a franchise model, Sherpa Kids not only benefits from the local knowledge of the provider, it also contributes to the economic and employment prospects of local communities since all decision - making is done at local level by owners and franchisees are encouraged to source products locally.Contact us today on [phone]By using a franchise model, Sherpa Kids not only benefits from the local knowledge of the provider, it also contributes to the economic and employment prospects of local communities since all decision - making is done at local level by owners and franchisees are encouraged to source products locally.Contact us today on [phone]by owners and franchisees are encouraged to source products locally.Contact us today on [phone].

The recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in 2337310 Ontario Inc. v. 2264145 Ontario Inc., 2014 ONSC 4370, addressed a partial summary judgment motion brought by the franchisee of a cafe seeking a declaration that it was entitled to exercise its right of rescission under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 («the Act»).

On July 4, 2017, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released a decision in Trillium Motor World Ltd. v. General Motors of Canada Limited about an appeal from a dismissal of a class action trial against General Motors of Canada by a group of its terminated franchisees / dealers.

In Kanda Franchising Inc. et al. v. 1795517 Ontario Inc., Iftikhar Hossain and Parveen Hussain, a decision released by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Newmarket on November 28, 2017, the court held that the individual principals of the franchisee corporation were not bound by the arbitration agreement that was contained in the franchise agreement.

At issue in that decision were allegations by some franchisees that the franchisor was overcharging for the food and supplies provided to franchisees and that this constituted,... [more]

On April 15, 2015, the Quebec Court of Appeal released its highly anticipated decision in Bertico Inc. v. Dunkin' Brands Canada Ltd., a group action brought against Dunkin' Donuts by 21 of its franchisees in Quebec.

The appeal by Maple Leaf arises from the motion judge's decision concluding that Maple Leaf owed a duty of care to the franchisees «in relation to the production, processing, sale and distribution of the RTE Meats» and a duty of care «with respect to any representations made that the RTE Meats were fit for human consumption and posed no risk of harm.»

The next decision Realogy made was to make Zap an integral part of its brands» value propositions for their franchisees by providing it free of charge.