Sentences with phrase «decision by the justice»

The decision by Justice Jennifer Schecter of the New York state court in Manhattan in favor of California restaurateur Summer Zervos, a former contestant on NBC's «The Apprentice,» raises the prospect that Trump might have to answer embarrassing questions in court about his behavior toward women.

Justice John Tshoho became the second judge to withdraw from the case after the decision by Justice Ahmed Mohammed who earlier pulled out of the case having been accused of bias by the accused.

Nevada (R): The decision by the Justice Department not to pursue charges against Sen. John Ensign in a case involving the husband of his mistress is actually bad news for national Republicans.

DiNapoli on Monday called the decision by the Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs «troubling» and said it raises questions about its performance.

The decision by Justice Mohammed Idris last Friday has now cleared the way for SERAP to advance its case against the Federal Government on the publication of the reports of investigation into the allegations of budget padding and prosecution of indicted officers of the National Assembly.

The Supreme Court decision by Justice Goepel did not find that the arrangement was unfair or unreasonable under s. 68, but instead scrutinized whether it was fair under the ss.

The decision by Justice Jamie Campbell said the NSBS Society did not have the power to deny TWU's law graduates accreditation.

A recent decision by Justice Paul Perell provides the insured with some relief from this trap.

«This decision by Justice Campbell clarifies any confusion that might have otherwise existed,» says Brown.

That's according to a recent decision by Justice Stinson, in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice [2014 ONSC 3411 (CanLII)-RSB-

Central to the decision by Justice Robert Maranger was the effect of such devices on the court's proceedings and recording equipment.

Much has been written about last month's physician - assisted suicide decision by Justice Perell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in B. (A.) v. Canada (Attorney General).

The March 13 decision by Justice Garth Malakoe of the Territorial Court of the Northwest Territories challenges 2010 rules brought in under the Truth in Sentencing Act.

The latest data point on this question is in: check out Roper v. Simmons, a 5 - 4 decision by Justice Kennedy invalidating the use of the death penalty for juveniles, overruling the Court's 1989 decision in Stanford v. Kentucky...»

The decision by Justice O'Donnell in R. v. Duncan (on SLAW here) has gained some notoriety in the legal community -LRB-(Katie Daubs, «Legal Decision with literary flourish and dry wit making the round...», Toronto Star, March 29, 2013) and was the subject of a SLAW post by Simon Fodden (The Judge's Tale, April 2, 2013).

The judge determined that it had already been decided that Mr. Gonzalez did not, in the decision by Justice Butler.

At the end, it resulted in a decision by Justice Granger that awarded $ 11.4 million to the employer, plus over $ 4 million in costs.

Although we are in the middle of a summer heat wave, a July 10, 2013 decision by Justice Johnston in Grant v The Corporation of the City of Kingston and Queen's University, ONSC 4689 (CanLII) has caused me to consider legal issues regarding a claim for damages for personal injuries arising from a mid-winter slip and fall incident on an icy sidewalk.

The decision by Justice Sullivan notes the approach by Alberta and Ontario to the issue is different than the rest of Canada.

Most significant has been last week's decision by Justice Russel Zinn of the Federal Court in Construction and Specialized Workers» Union, Local 1611 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration).

In a second ruling yesterday, the court unanimously accepted the Crown's appeal of a decision by Justice Williams to sever the 26 counts of first degree murder into six and twenty as well as errors of law in three rulings on evidence and errors in the jury charge.

In this decision by Justice Harrison, the court dealt with the legal costs following failure of Mr Fan's medical negligence claim.

By: Jonnette Watson Hamilton PDF Version: Expensive, Complex Appeals from Residential Tenancy Dispute Resolution Service Orders Case Commented On: Nee v Ayre & Oxford Inc, 2015 ABQB 402 (CanLII) The decision by Justice Donald Lee in Nee v Ayre &... Continue reading →

Now, after a recent Ontario Superior Court decision by Justice Sean Dunphy, the practice may be on its way out.

First, from the Court of Appeal, is a motion decision by Justice Miller in Yim v. Song, 2016 ONCA 642.

The Belway decision by Justice Martin is a rare example of an application for leave being granted to a vexatious litigant.

Accordingly, we can perhaps glean more here by comparing this decision with previous decisions by Justice Veldhuis concerning an applicant seeking to appeal a development approval decision under the Municipal Government Act.

This is a decision by Justice Barbara Veldhuis to deny the applicant leave to appeal an approval for development of lands in the Town of Banff.

In an unprecedented move, the Chief Justice recently varied the decision by Justice Wagner over intervener groups in the appeal of Trinity Western University, et al. v. Law Society of Upper Canada.

Who hears appeals: Appeals from decisions by justices of the peace are heard by a judge of the Ontario Court of Justice.

The plaintiff attempted to appeal this motion decision, but the recent decision by Justice Kiteley at the Divisional Court in Jane Doe 464533 v N.D. refused to overturn it.

A robust certification decision by Justice Robert Sharpe (Robertson v. Thomson Corp., 1999 CanLII 14768 (ON SC)-RRB- followed in 1999.

The recent decision by Justice Reeves in the Federal Court, QGC Pty Ltd v Bygrave (No 2)[64] reinterprets the role of the applicant as a party to an ILUA (area agreement): see Text Box 2.7.

Today's decision by Justice Finn of the Federal Court of Australia to formally recognise the native title rights of Torres Strait Islanders in the Torres Strait Regional Sea Claim is a significant cause for celebration, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Mick Gooda said today.

By Andrew Feldstein This recent decision by Justice Fryer of the Superior Court of Justice is a well - written decision that provides a very good summary of the law of costs.

Not exact matches

In the notice of his decision, New York Supreme Court Justice Manuel Mendez supported the arguments made by Schneiderman at the November 25 hearing and did not appear to be sympathetic to or convinced by those of DraftKings or FanDuel attorneys.

The Supreme Court's Citizens United decision in 2010 allowed for unlimited political spending by corporations, but Justice Anthony Kennedy expressed his strong support for public disclosure of the money spent.

«A criminal defendant, we hold, need not request special interrogatories, nor need he acquiesce in the Government's request for discrete findings by the jury, in order to preserve in full a timely - raised objection to jury instructions,» Justice J. Ginsburg wrote in her explanation of the court's decision.

Meeting on the first Monday in October, as required by law, the justices entered the crowded marble courtroom for the first time since their momentous decision in late June that upheld President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.

But they agree that a decision by the U.S. District Court in April or May will be a «key catalyst that will tip the scales or at least show the hand» of the Department of Justice, she said.

The Justice Department told Bloomberg in a statement that Sessions will make decisions on recusing himself from certain parts of the Cohen probe on a «matter - by - matter» basis.

The French decision follows the May ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the case of Mario Costeja González, a Spanish man who succeeded in ordering Google to remove links to an old article saying that his home was being repossessed to pay off debts.

The majority cited a score of decisions recognizing the First Amendment rights of corporations, and Justice Stevens acknowledged that «we have long since held that corporations are covered by the First Amendment.»

Not one executive of any major Wall Street firm that caused the financial crash in 2008 through fraudulent activities was prosecuted by the U.S. Justice Department — which was headed at the time by law partners from Covington & Burling — the Big Tobacco law firm that was singled out in a Federal Court decision for hiding the deadly effects of cigarette smoke for decades.

Wirlu - murra's response to the recent decision handed down by Justice McKerracher on Tuesday 12th February 2013 is attached below.

It is a unanimous decision authored by Justice Kagan.

The purpose of these sorts of reviews is to translate core ethical values of respect, diversity, beneficence and justice identified by the Menlo Report into corporate decision - making.

Chairman Nunes» decision, supported by House Speaker Ryan and Republican Members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, to publicly release misleading allegations against the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation is a shameful effort to discredit these institutions, undermine the Special Counsel's ongoing investigation, and undercut congressional probes.

McGahn said Trump would reconsider the decision if certain changes were made to «mitigate the risks identified» by the Department of Justice.

«Chairman Nunes» decision, supported by House Speaker Ryan and Republican Members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, to publicly release misleading allegations against the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation is a shameful effort to discredit these institutions, undermine the Special Counsel's ongoing investigation, and undercut congressional probes,» the committee's Democrats said in a statement.