This was a brilliant
decision by the editors of this series.
The decision by the editor of the quarterly newsletter of the APS Forum on Physics and Society to invite opposing (scientific) views on climate change does not change the overall consensus.
Even single - point
decisions by editors would be better than what we have.
Not exact matches
But after the news broke, a Breitbart
editor decided to ramp up the controversy even further
by posting an article mocking Shapiro and his
decision to leave — an article that was published under the name William Bigelow, a pseudonym used
by the former Breitbart writer's father.
He added: «In reporting the news, the SCMP will be objective, accurate and fair... day - to - day editorial
decisions will be driven
by editors in the newsroom, not in the corporate boardroom.»
The magazine's
editor - in - chief, Gerard Biard, defended the
decision to run the cartoons
by saying, «These publications will not cost lives.
Practice Update: HIV and breastfeeding - Morrison P. - Essentially MIDIRS, August 2014; 5 (7): 38 - 9, available at page 38 HIV and breastfeeding: the unfolding evidence - Morrison P and Faulkner Z - Essentially MIDIRS, Dec / Jan 2015; 5 (11): 7 - 13, Breastfeeding for HIV - Positive Mothers - Morrison P - Breastfeeding Today, 1 November 2014; 26:20 - 25 What HIV - positive women want to know about breastfeeding - Morrison P - World AIDS Day 2013 issue of Fresh Start, Trinidad & Tobago, 1 December 2013 (see pages 8 - 12) Informed choice in infant feeding
decisions can be supported for HIV - infected women even in industrialized countries - Morrison P, Greiner T, Israel - Ballard K - AIDS 2011, 24 September 2011, PMID: 21811145 Letter to the
Editor (2014)- Pamela Morrison & Ted Greiner - Health Care for Women International, 35:10, 1109 - 1112, DOI: 10.1080 / 07399332.2014.954705 Conquering Fear and Stigma with Knowledge: HIV - Positive Mothers and Breastfeeding, Fresh Start
by Best Start - Morrison P interviewed
by Dr Amanda Gabrielle Jones - HIV / AIDS Awareness supplement towards an AIDS - Free Generation, Issue 6, p 8, December 2014 Breastfeeding with HIV, is breast still best?
Asked if Rupert Murdoch had made the call, he insisted that that «the
decision was made
by the
editor».
ITV News Business
Editor spoke to AstraZeneca shareholder and fund manager Neil Woodford this evening, who said he was «delighted
by the resolve of the board» and happy with their
decision to reject the takeover bid.
Jim Gray, the
editor of Channel 4 News, said: «We welcome the
decision by the Electoral Commission to probe further into the questions our report raised.
Despite cutbacks
by its parent company, Newhouse, New Jersey's Gloucester County Times made a
decision to not back away from statehouse coverage, says
Editor John Barna.
Miliband, whose leadership may have been rescued from the brink
by the phone - hacking scandal, revelled in Cameron's
decision to take on former News of the World
editor Andy Coulson.
Firstly comes the phone - hacking scandal, linked to the prime minister
by his
decision to hire News of the World's former
editor Andy Coulson as his director of communications.
Alan Rusbridger,
editor of the Guardian, said: «The
decision by Neil Hamilton and Ian Greer must be one of the most astonishing legal cave - ins in the history of the law of libel.»
Patrick Hennessey, the newspaper's political
editor, has blogged this: «The true depth of the anger felt
by senior Tories at the
decision by David Davis to resign his parliamentary seat and fight a
by - election is revealed publicly for the first time in The Sunday Telegraph tomorrow when a leading Conservative breaks cover and directly criticises the former shadow home secretary.»
The
decision about whether or not to accept the paper is made
by one of the
editors and I let the authors know if their paper will appear in our journal.
In addition to this precaution, reviewers are required to disclose any conflicts with the evaluation of the paper, and this information is taken into account
by the
editors when
decisions are made.
Until recently these
decisions have been made
by professional news
editors.
Haldar stands
by the
decision to retract, on which «six senior PLoS Pathogens
editors unanimously agreed,» given that its key findings were wrong.
The
decision was made
by the journal
editors, who select one article a day from across the 55 ACS journals to appear in this special collection.
However, editorial
decisions at Cell Reports aremade independently
by its in - house
editors.
Decisions regarding suitability of advertising are based upon the editorial integrity and reputation of AMP's journals and websites, and must be in keeping with the mission and principles of AMP as determined
by the respective Editorial Boards and
Editors.
ONE2ONE MAGAZINE — Sept 15 — ARTICLE
BY MARK BROOKS, ONLINE PERSONALS WATCH
EDITOR / BLOGGER — Which of these people would you trust with probably the most important
decision you'll ever make?
Just over a year later, it's coming to the big screen and generating Oscar buzz, as well as conversations about how its story — which centers on the
decision by Washington Post publisher Katharine Graham and
editor - in - chief Ben Bradlee to publish the Pentagon Papers in 1971 — relates to First Amendment struggles in 2017.
In 1978, EPE sold The Chronicle to its
editors — a
decision that set the stage for a fundamental shift in direction
by EPE to pre-K-12 education.
But what about the
editors and reporters who cover education issues — and whose work is read
by the public and policymakers who are making real - life education
decisions every day?
Yet, in spite of all of the drama that has occurred in the time since the ruling, a number of individuals — from parents to politicians to members of the media — have inexplicably opined in letters - to - the -
editor, blog posts and the like that the fateful
decision made
by four of the seven justices on the State Supreme Court would not hurt the charter school movement in Georgia nor stifle the progress that has been made to give parents and students quality public school choice options.
Sojourners Magazine just published a blog comment / letter to the
editor I wrote in response to a previous article
by Nicole Baker Fulgham, «Beyond «Superman,»» which referenced «Waiting for Superman» in recommending that meaningful reform must involve all stakeholders having a stronger, more meaningful voice in school
decision - making.
What it beat: Chevrolet Corvette ZR - 1, Lexus LS400, Nissan 300ZX You probably didn't know: Then -
editor - in - chief David E. Davis, Jr., chose the first AOY entirely
by himself, then announced his
decision to the editorial staff.
By Stephen Windwalker
Editor, Kindle Nation Daily © Kindle Nation Daily 2011 ALBUQUERQUE, April 1 — In preparing to send out this week's Kindle Nation weekly digest after a serious case of Workweekus Interruptus, we had to make some tough business and editorial
decisions.
A reference document, compiled
by a copy
editor, to show editing
decisions that have been made and to ensure those
decisions are applied consistently throughout the text.
Is that a
decision influenced
by the Table of Contents in the respective Japanese Weekly Shonen Jump issue, or is that a
decision made solely
by you, as
Editor - in - Chief of English Weekly Shonen Jump?
Again, this post written
by my
editor, Brooke Warner sheds light on the distribution problem and as I'm getting a head start learning about the intricacies of these channels and the pros and cons, I'm learning how to also make more knowledgeable
decisions.
In this interview, conducted
by email with American Libraries Senior
Editor Beverly Goldberg, Budler discussed her
decision and its ramifications for Kansas.
It is this need for writers to be better informed so that they can make the best
decisions about their own careers and participate fully in shaping the industry that is, after all, so reliant on them, that inspired us to set - up the Writing Platform — a new Arts Council England - funded initiative run
by The Literary Platform, with me in the role of
Editor, in association with Bath Spa University.
In a remarkable display of biased reasoning, Dr. Kurt Matushek,
editor - in - chief of JAVMA, defends his
decision to reject a commentary
by Dr. Ralph Brinster, a recipient of the National Medal of Science, and 19 other of the most distinguished names in veterinary medicine, including former members of the American Veterinary Medical Association Council on Education.
(c) The Corresponding Secretary shall have charge of the correspondence including, but not limited to handling routine inquiries from the public, internal and external Club communication, and related questions; notify members of meetings; notify Officers and Directors of their election to office via special mailing or other approved method of communication; receive applications for membership; applications must be acknowledged within 15 days of receipt
by e-mail or postal mail; check accompanying application must be sent to the Treasurer for deposit within 30 days of receipt; send copy of membership applications to President, Treasurer, Recording Secretary and Newsletter
Editor; check new applicants references and report findings to the Board; receive complaints from members regarding applicant; forward complaints to Board via email within 15 days of receipt; notify applicant if his / her application was approved or declined within 15 days of Board
decision; keep an up - to - date roll of the members of the Club with their addresses and other pertinent information and provide same to Website
Editor; the mailing address of the Apricot / Red Poodle Club shall be that of the Corresponding Secretary; and carry out such other duties as are prescribed in these
by - laws.
After all, what appears on newspaper opinion pages is a
decision made
by editors.
... anyone involved wouldn't would have known that
by virtue of the authors, the paper would attract attention and controversy — and consequently made sure that the
editor - in - chief was involved in the
decision to publish.
2 April: SMH: Peter Hannam: «Conspiracist» climate change study withdrawn amid legal threats Climate change academics say the
decision by a publisher to retract their paper examining the links between conspiracy theorists and denial of global warming because of legal threats could have a «chilling effect» on research... «Sadly, it has turned into a routine for outsiders with no scientific standing to approach, bully, or intimidate journals,
editors, and academics,» said Professor Lewandowsky, now at the UK's University of Bristol.
He said those placement
decisions are made
by editors.
Just as the current edition took a major step forward
by elimination of the heretofore sacrosanct, but totally useless period, in legal citation, the
editors of the Guide to Canadian Legal Research are able to introduce reality into the practice of citing court
decisions by a few simple changes to the recommended Hierarchy of Sources for case law.
While some of the legislative instruments and aspects considered
by the various contributions of this book have been repealed or affected
by recent
decisions of the Court of Justice, the book maintains its scientific value thanks to the constitutional approach chosen
by the
editors.
These
editors, whose names adorn the first ninety volumes of Supreme Court Reports, are known collectively as the «nominative» reporters (the Library of the U.S. Supreme Court maintains a complete list of cases
by reporter volume and date of
decision).
Headnotes — a brief summary, comment, or explanation, often prepared
by an
editor and pladed at the beginning of a court
decision.
International Law in Brief (weekly electronic newsletter covering developments in international law, including summaries of judicial and other
decisions (with hypertext links to full texts), prepared
by the Attorney -
Editors of International Legal Materials, a publication of the American Society of International Law)
The Criminal Law Reports (that included editorial commentary
by its
editor, Professor Alan Mewett, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto) and the Criminal Reports began including more Provincial Court
decisions.
While many judges would say that too many of their
decisions are published in print, the test employed
by editors at Maritime Law Book is: would the case be useful to a lawyer.
It is odd, therefore, to find on Judicial Power's list of 50 «problematic» cases Liversidge v Anderson — which is criticised
by the
editors of the list as showing «excessive deference to the executive's wide discretionary powers in wartime» and for «giving no effect to a statutory provision requiring the Home Secretary to have reasonable grounds for a detention
decision».
By way of the CanLII listserv, Principal
Editor Ivan Mokanov has just announced that the first two hundred Supreme Court of Canada
decisions prior to 1985 have been digitized and published on the CanLII website.