The CJEU
decision followed a reference and a preliminary ruling by the French Conseil d'État on whether certain prescription support software that provides healthcare professionals with information on patients relating to contraindications, drug interactions and dosage limits can be classified as a «medical device».
Not exact matches
Think about how anyone perusing your Twitter page will be able to
reference more than just a few scant words for basing their
decision to
follow or engage with you.
First, given that the characteristic feature of
decisions in general is limitation (
following PR 164), Christian still has to make sense of Whitehead's
reference to the «transcendent
decision of God» a propos of pure potentiality.
Compare the Rodriguez court's
references to a questionable «correlation between educational expenditures and the quality of education» with the
following discussion by the Supreme Court of Texas in a 2016 adequacy
decision:
oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 -
decision, para. 1: there was a
reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the
reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft
decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not
followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??
However, it is important to note that Shepherdizing the Hoffman case reveals over 2400 citing
references many of which involved a court declining to extend the
decision or not
following on state law grounds.
In a six to one jointly written
decision (Moldaver, J. in dissent), the Supreme Court of Canada has answered the questions In the Matter of a
Reference by the Governor in Council concerning sections 5 and 6 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. S - 26, as set out in Order in Council P.C. 2013 - 1105 dated October 22, 2013 2014 SCC 21 as
follows:
The traditions of law publishing brands run deep and have great quantifiable value, few more so than of that other renowned work, not on this occasion from Butterworths but Sweet and Maxwell, Archbold, as we anticipate the possibility of litigation
following the English Judicial Executive Board's
decision that Blackstone's Criminal Practice rather than Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice should be the standard legal
reference work in the criminal courts.
The High Court
decision follows hard on the heals of the House of Lords»
decision [2008] UKHL 6; [2008] 2 WLR 311, [2008] 2 All ER 1, of 30 January 2008, where the law lords effectively changed the law, (reversing a previous House of Lords» ruling in Stubbings v Webb [1993] AC 498, 1993] 1 All ER 322, which held that claims arising from intentional assaults were governed by s 2 of LA 1980), and held that an intentional assault fell within LA 1980, s 11, and was therefore subject to a three - year limitation period, which could be extended by
reference to knowledge (s 14), or at the court's discretion (s 33), rather than under LA 1980, s 2, which while providing for a more generous six - year limitation period, was nevertheless not extendable in any circumstances by the court.
Following an earlier Federal Court of Appeal
decision, Justice Roy reasoned that «without any
reference to studies that will show, once they have to be produced, the existence of the promised utility, how is the public to know that utility is demonstrated.»
This lapse is particularly troubling because the Opinion based its analysis on the
following statement: «In order to ensure effective judicial review of that type of
decision, the assessment of its validity must therefore in my view be carried out by
reference to the current factual and legal context.»
In any event, this is not what
follows from the conception of the Federal Constitutional Court: This jurisprudence requires the Court to make a
reference before it finds an act of EU law ultra vires but the Court still reserves to itself that power for the aftermath of an ECJ
decision.
Take the
following paragraph from the CBOC's website dated September 10, 2012 — which I've
referenced, previously: «VOWs are password - protected websites that permit customers to search a full inventory of listings containing up - to - date data online, before making the
decision to tour a home or attend an open house.