Sentences with phrase «decision follows a circuit»

Today's decision follows a circuit court judge's motion in August 2010 to set aside Cuccinelli's request.

Not exact matches

Though the Second Circuit did not follow the Ninth Circuit's metaphysical flight into autonomous individualism, its own decision, based on the Equal Protection clause, and apparently safer, may in fact be more dangerous.

The Windsor decision striking down DOMA was less sweeping, with state and circuit courts following the Roe social engineering model more directly.

«While we are disappointed in the decision and will weigh our appellate options, we look forward to a prompt retrial where we will have another opportunity to present the overwhelming evidence of Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos's guilt and again give the public the justice it deserves,» Acting US Attorney Joon H. Kim announced Tuesday following the circuit court's decision.

Following the decision of U.S President Donald Trump to ban citizens of seven countries from entry the country, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday refused to reinstate President's Executive Order.

Appeal seeks reversal of Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision terminating interference without determining priority of inventorship of CRISPR / Cas9 gene editing Brief asserts that the Board failed to properly apply controlling U.S. Supreme Court and Federal Circuit precedents, and ignored evidence of multiple groups readily applying CRISPR / Cas9 gene editing to eukaryotic cells following teachings of Charpentier - Doudna team

This follows an order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which allowed Judge Koh to make the decision.

For now, the Second Circuit panel has granted the stay, meaning that Apple can temporarily hold off on following through with some of the decisions that Cote ordered last year.

The Indexed Annuity Leadership Council (IALC) released the following statement in response to the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to vacate the Department of Labor's (DOL) fiduciary rule in its entirety.

Following a broadly structured decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to vacate the DOL fiduciary rule expansion, the National Association for Fixed Annuities decided its own appellate challenge has been made unnecessary.

For example, the federal appeals court in Chicago (7th Circuit) will still make its own determination on the appeals for the Cook County and Chicago ordinances and will not be required to follow the decisions on appeal in Phoenix and New York because they are in a different cCircuit) will still make its own determination on the appeals for the Cook County and Chicago ordinances and will not be required to follow the decisions on appeal in Phoenix and New York because they are in a different circuitcircuit.

«The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled today that the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) did not follow the law in its recently - announced decision to allow the importation of elephant and lion «trophies» from Zimbabwe and Zambia.

The game makers are wrong to argue that the Federal Circuit should rehear the case because the appellate court panel allegedly created a «safe harbor» for technological ideas, as the court simply followed precedent for abstract claims as set by Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not eligible for a patent, asserted McRO Inc. in its brief.

WASHINGTON — American Energy Alliance President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement on the DC Circuit's decision to deny a stay for EPA's carbon regulation: «While not surprising, the DC Circuit's decision is disappointing and erroneous.

Following the recent expiration of Amazon's infamous 1 - Click US patent coupled with the Federal Circuit's remarkable ruling in Visual Memory, Nick Shipp, Partner at Kilburn & Strode, explains the need for more stricter specifications and how these decisions affect patent law in Europe.

Following a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that allowed the immediate enforcement of a state law blocking women from getting services from one - third of abortion providers in the state, reproductive health care providers have taken their case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Supreme Court's decline of a Seventh Circuit appellate decision solidifies that where an employee is medically unable to return to work within a very short time period following a leave of absence, the employer has no additional federal legal obligation to provide additional leave, or hold the employee's job open.

Today is Equal Pay Day, and it follows yesterday's decision from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Rizo v. Yovino, which ruled that employers can not rely on employees» past salaries to justify paying women less than men.

The Croll decision in the United States has been followed by some but not all of the other circuit courts in the United States who have reviewed the issue.

Sept. 29, 2012): Following the Sixth Circuit's decision, the Kentucky Supreme Court amended the commits clause to only prohibit commitments, pledges, or promises inconsistent with the impartial performance of judicial duties.

denied, 133 S. Ct. 209 (2012): Following the Eighth Circuit's decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 416 F. 3d 738 (8th Cir.

The court below, the Circuit Court of the United States for Missouri, in which this suit was afterwards brought, followed the decision of the State court, and rendered a like judgment against the plaintiff.

I've had various conversations with industry players in recent years, but not in the months following the Federal Circuit decision.

In a recent decision in In re Paulsboro Derailment Cases, the Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a case brought by plaintiffs who alleged that they had been exposed to airborne chemicals following a train derailment.

The decision follows a long line of Fourth Circuit decisions in which contractors have been granted protection from liability when they perform work that supports important governmental functions.

An otherwise routine decision this morning from the D.C. Circuit raised a question I must confess to never before having considered: Why do the Article III D.C. district court and D.C. Circuit consider themselves bound to follow the Article I District of Columbia Court of Appeals on questions of «District of Columbia» law?

Following Covington's argument in April 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's decision, securing the clients» victory.

Following on the heels of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's disappointing and dangerous decision that APIs are copyrightable, the fair use verdict ensures some degree of protection against copyright creep for software innovation and interoperability.

The decision, rendered by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, applies to only seven Midwestern states (Minnesota, Missouri, Iowa, Arkansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota), but according to Harney, it follows on the heels of two similar appellate court decisions covering an additional eight states (Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Indiana).