Sentences with phrase «decision matters since»

Asked whether Nordstrom's decision matters since Ivanka Trump said she stepped down from her companies, Spicer said it still damages a brand that carries her name.

Not exact matches

Interpreting this one clause involves decisions on some very technical matters, but since I can not deal with those, I will describe the issue in more general terms.

This is not the regular season, it's not a knee or a foot — no one knows Embiid body better than him — Thursday will be 3 weeks since his injury — if his eye is Not healed than he absolutely should NOT play — even if that means losing the series — but if his eye is healed & it's a matter of pain threshold then Embiid should make the decision

He should also play a part in underpinning a mom's decision since — according to a tweet from the committee — «most breast - feeding moms say the support that matters most comes from fathers and grandmothers.»

According to the Supreme court's recent decision regarding prop 8 it does not matter since is we do not have standing to bring a case against an administration for failure to enforce laws.

The workers, who have won the backing of the Trump administration, 20 states, and numerous labor watchdogs, argue that these payments are tantamount to forced political advocacy, since the government unions affect budgetary decisions and other matters of public policy.

AEG's winning bid has come under intense scrutiny since the surprise decision earlier this month, with both the U.S. Attorney's Office and the state Inspector General launching probes into the matter.

But when she becomes enamored with a British stranger (Tom Hiddleston), not only does her stance on the matters of love change, but she finds herself regretting her decision to ignore the warnings she's been receiving ever since she was a little girl.

Rosler has since confirmed that Hoffmann will no longer be involved with the exhibition, and that she «supports the Jewish Museum's decision to take this matter seriously and to safeguard its employees».

I find the orthodox titles for these approaches very sub-optimal if not simply misleading, and this matters since the public will have to generally understand and support such measures for decisions on research funding, governance and any eventual deployment to be made.

What you find reasonable does not matter since you are not a decision maker.

Policies to address climate change would affect both consumption and investment, but for the purposes of evaluation what matters is the effect on investment, since it is the effect of policies on investment decisions that will determine rates of innovation and hence economic growth, the ability to adapt to climate change, and future consumption.

Since legal review is the most expensive phase of e-discovery, and privilege coding is the most expensive phase of legal review, it isn't a surprise that 57 % of participants are re-using coding decisions made on documents for previous matters.

Since the provisions of the Act prohibiting the Commissioner from disclosing any records until a final decision is made are procedural, the matter of disclosure is accordingly left to the court's discretion, subject to statutory or common law rules.

In this application Penn West applied to strike the action against it on the basis that it was an abuse of process (since the matters raised were «virtually» the same as the matters raised in the Crown action) and on the basis that in part at least it represented a collateral attack on regulatory decisions made by the Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB) as the predecessor of the current Alberta Energy Regulator (AER or Regulator).

Since that time, DOJ has provided additional guidance on a case - by - case basis as FCPA matters are made public — providing meaningful examples by incorporating factual details and identifying more factors material to the government's decision - making in the particular charging documents, plea agreements, deferred prosecution agreements and non-prosecution agreements used to resolve FCPA matters.

BENEFITS: • Achievement of 17 % cost savings in their legal department spending since implementing CounselLink ® • Ability to make smarter decisions about how they assign matters to outside counsel, with the use of valuable data for tracking and analyzing the performance of Fred Loya's law firms • Delivery of reports that keep everyone accountable for litigation vs. settlement decisions, time management and other legal spending considerations • Outstanding, ongoing technical support and customer service from LexisNexis • Reliance on this central matter management system for the legal department provides a hub for tracking all matters throughout their lifecycle • Use of the Law Firm Registry feature has become a powerful tool for helping Fred Loya quickly establish working relationships with qualified law firms in particular venues where they have specific needs

And should the matter take a negative turn or end unfavourably for the client, the client is more likely to blame the lawyer for the actions taken, since it was the lawyer's «decision,» not the client's, that resulted in the unfavourable result.

2) apart from the fact that CJEU stated that even before EU exercising its power, the MS must still act - when they have the power to do so - in a matter which does not jeopardise or prejudice the EU, so that the mere «potential» competence does have an effect, limitating the MS action, the parallel is that a negative rule is still a rule, so that the existence of the rule makes the matter «regulated»: - as for the JHA, I must say that whilst I agree with you on the merits, I can see the issue raised by the CJEU, since it is quite the same raised by some national Constitutional Courts, i.e. that ECHR standards may be in conflict with national standards and formally speaking the ECHR is a treaty and therefore has a lower rank that national Constititions, and the decision of the ECHR on the interpretation of such standards within the context of the Convention does not bind the national Constitutional Court in interpreting the national Constitution standards: e.g..

Overall, Justices Miller and Lauwers agreed with their colleague that this case falls within the category of exceptional cases in which remitting the matter to the decision - maker would be pointless since there is only one possible outcome.

Some of the latest applications that offer matter transparency to clients could be utilized for partner retention and succession decisions, since these applications examine real - time information on fees, costs and work - to - date profitability.

It may be thought that this Court of Appeal decision on Rule 20 confirms the Panel's view, since the analysis does not permit any role to a value judgment on the benefits of public discussion of matters of public interest.

According to a recent and legally - binding decision of a Dutch court based on the Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, the court of the residence of the injured party has jurisdiction regarding a claim against the ski resort operator since such a matter can be qualified as a consumer dispute if certain criteria are fulfilled.

``... notwithstanding the passage of some 16 years since the time of the brief solicitor - client relationship, the lack of recollection of that relationship by both D.G.C. and Sachs J. prior to the release of the Decision, and the independent concurrence of Frank J. and myself in the Decision authored by Sachs J., in my view prudence dictates that the Decision be set aside, this panel stand down from this matter, and a new panel be constituted by the Associate Chief Justice to re-hear the appeal.»

These matters should not have influenced the decision to uplift at all since they did not relate to any failure to complete the statutory procedure.»

And since arbitrator's decisions are made privately and are unknown to the public unless challenged in court, how will the track record of arbitrators relating to jurisdictional matters be judged?

However, it is unwise to make a hasty decision on such an important matter since family finances are at stake here.

After confirming the same update for the Canadian market, it was just a matter of time before the same came down to the U.S. Nonetheless, Verizon's decision could also be a risky one since Samsung says that it is only looking out for its valued customers that could be potentially hurt with an exploding Note 7 unit.

Adams attempted to appeal the decision to the Board of Directors, but since the matter was characterized as one concerning amount of commission due, it was ruled unappealable under the Board's bylaws.

Without ruling on the facts alleged by the Commissioner and TREB (since the Tribunal's decision was based on a matter of law and did not deal with the facts), the FCA sent the case back to the Tribunal for reconsideration.

Since the place is smaller, our decor decisions matter as you actually SEE everything in this great room.