Sentences with phrase «decision people often»

The infographic below from Credible.com illustrates the thought processes and decisions people often make when they are considering a refinancing option.

Not exact matches

Investing for a future large purchase, your retirement, or to simply build your wealth is a smart financial decision, but factors such as lack of general knowledge and high costs of investing often deter people from jumping in the investment world.

Venture capitalists often demand significant input into management decisions by, for instance, placing one or more people on your board of directors.

If you make these decisions unconsciously, you'll end up like majority of people who tend to be out of shape physically, exhausted emotionally and often financially stressed.

You will often hear stories about someone who didn't read people and acted in anger, or maybe it's someone who didn't read people correctly and paid for it when a business decision ended up looking cold and impersonal.

This one is intuitively obvious, but people often underestimate just how little distraction it takes to ruin our decision - making.

Given how much information we're all constantly bombarded with, it often happens that people make decisions based on first impressions rather than a thorough reading of whatever you're sending them.

Timezones are tricky, and it's often necessary for remote employees to make decisions with imperfect information, even if the right person isn't around in the moment to make the decision themselves.

If somebody is not getting back to you, often times it is because they are the wrong person in their organization to make decisions about your product or service.

People often believe they need to make a radical break or big decision to break with the past and then become paralyzed by fear.

On the negative side, people who work for autocratic managers often feel as though their contributions are not valued by the organization and decisions often don't consider how it will affect employees other than the manager.

What stops people from making the best possible decisions for themselves often isn't the deciding.

Says Crainer, «There are often people in an organization who are overlooked and they might be where the best decisions come from.»

Also, one reason people often fail to make good decisions — financial or otherwise — is because those decisions are too complicated or intimidating.

«People often make decisions that are influenced by emotions that have nothing to do with the decisions they are making,» says Stéphane Côté, a professor at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management, who co-wrote the study with lead researcher Jeremy Yip of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

(Like many of you who read this blog, Ardath has a B2B focus; when she says «buyer,» «customer,» or «audience» — terms often used interchangeably here — she means people who make substantial purchasing decisions.)

Unsuccessful people, the book says, have a habit, without exception, of reaching decisions very slowly, if at all, and of changing these decisions quickly and often.

For people who aren't celebrities or billionaires, the decision to abandon Facebook came reluctantly, because the platform often served as their sole connection to certain relatives, friends and professional opportunities.

All too often people make decisions based on fear and this prevents us from making any real progress.

«The grand jury's decision does not negate the fact that Michael Brown's tragic death is part of an alarming national trend of officers using excessive force against people of color, often during routine encounters.

Money is an emotional topic for many people, which often leads to bad decisions.

Bureaucracy drives out good people, slows down decision making, kills innovation and is often the petri dish of bad politics»

Capital controls often lead people to alternative assets, and it seems India's decision to phase out 500 notes and 1000 -LSB-...]

McFarlane writes in a style that points out the opportunity costs of every financial decision you make, often in a style that people don't want to hear.

In often excruciating detail, she explains how people of different faiths make different decisions about these matters.

Those decisions often force LGBT people into a world of either dishonesty or rejection.

I am not saying the church can stop a person from making bad decisions, but the church, despite its flaws, can help us grow and find wisdom without so much reliance on the school of hard knocks (an archaic term used often by my father).

Wealthy, powerful, influential people who may or may not personally operate within the confines of the doctrinal statement yet somehow tend to be invited to be not only part of the group, but often part of the decision makers.

Being involved on a daily basis with decisions that truly involve life and death for people often appears to put physicians on a path to at least seek out God.

The person acquires strength, not by achieving depth insight, but by the exercise of making decisions, taking responsibilities (often small, at the beginning), and handling the stresses of his life - situation while in a supportive relationship.

The public will have to make the decisions, as it often does, quite apart from any clear consensus among the people who know the technological aspects of the issue best.

It is often easy to look at other people's decisions and judge them, thinking that we know clearly what is right and what is wrong and that if we were in their shoes, we would have known what was the right thing to do.

The vast majority of atheists are non-confrontational people who came to the decision after learning about various religions, and often were raised in an organized religion.

This authority structure is typically described as a series of «coverings» or «protections» but unfortunately, the effect is often the opposite, as abused women and children find they have no recourse or power, as every decision in their lives must be made by a series of men, many of whom are more invested in protecting the reputation of the ministry than the people in it.

What I noticed missing most were the attributes of Christ in peoples lives and gospel values which intern effected their often poor decision making.

When a question is raised which for most people demands careful thought and responsible personal decision, people like that will very often simply quote a passage from the Scriptures, frequently in no way directly relevant to the matter under discussion and when relevant only valuable in the context of another age and under other conditions than those which are ours today.

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

Past programs all too often assumed answers and did not allow young people the opportunity to practice making their own decisions within a safe climate.

Not only do our decisions bleed into our other decisions, they touch on other people's lives, more often than not.

I made snap decisions about projects people had poured their lives into, and probably got it wrong often as not.

Personal growth often occurs more quickly by helping a person make a decision and take responsible action than by focusing mainly on changing feelings and attitudes.

Too often I see people just assuming that the available information is too incomplete / inaccurate to facilitate higher level decision making but seldom do they bother to check.

Perhaps an indication that the only person he has to learn from is Clichy who himself often makes very poor positional decisions, incidentally Clichy is the only player in the Gunners» squad that has a Premier League medal (not counting Mad Jens).

People need to be aware of possible complications, interactions, etc. to make the best decision for themselves and I'm afraid too often fenugreek is recommended without a full account or understanding of potential risks.

This often makes me doubt myself and the decisions I've made about how to feed and sleep with my baby... but then I look at my perfectly happy, pleasant kid, who loves to explore, and loves people, and laughs... and I know he is fine.

Often referred to as surrogates or gestational carriers, surrogate mothers make the compassionate decision to carry a baby for another person.

Also, the money seems not to be the main reason — if it was, people would not pay extra out of pocket for lay midwives if their hospital birth was covered by insurance, something that often happens, and people would definitely think twice before paying for the services of midwives in full at 36 weeks and then if they have to transfer end up with further hospital bills — these are not rational monetary decisions, they are paying these con artist in order to reinforce their feelings or beliefs.

a lack of «deliberation» in decision - making, in other words decisions usually made in haste by a single person or small group (all 12 cases)-- this is also often linked to the development of «group - think» in the decision - making coterie (8 cases).

From my extensive fieldwork in these marginalized regions in Colombia, I learned that people often make a pragmatic decision to support FARC or ELN, rather than an ideological choice.

Like anything, it is often influenced by the history of previous policy decisions, and corresponding attitudes that people develop.