When all is said and done, staying wide is more of a gut
decision than a brain decision in my case.
Not exact matches
The reality is that less
than one percent of leaders are optimizing their
brain - mind connection for extraordinary performance and agile
decision making.
Brains make better
decision - making organs
than guts.
His religious difficulty came from the kind of theology he found around him, its habit of identifying words in a book (written by human hands and thought by human
brains) with the words of God, also from the habit of playing fast and loose with the dangerously ambiguous concepts of omnipotence and omniscience, and taking these more seriously
than any definite affirmation of the freedom of creatures to make
decisions that are their own and not God's.
If we can train our
brains to filter preconception out of the equation, we're able to make spontaneous
decisions that are as good, or better,
than those over which we deliberate.
So, rather
than only striving to make the best
decisions I can, I may supplement my quasi-evangelic techniques by wearing a shirt with a cross on it, or I may leave a slip of paper with a Bible verse written on it on a table, in hopes that someone may see it and it spark some food for thought in his / her
brain.
If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all
decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more
than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half -
brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again
I suggest rather
than get
brain damage with all this speculation, we leave the
decisions to him and sleep well.
In less
than two months my
brain has been staunchly rewired; all circuits once devoted to making
decisions for myself have now been plugged into a big, blazing marquee blinking «Baby!
If your toddler has a tendency to run into the street, rather
than punish him for something his
brain is not mature enough to handle (the ability to stop, think, remember what you said and make a conscious
decision to turn away), find a solution that meets everyone's needs.
«We found genetic alterations in
brain metastases that could affect treatment
decisions in more
than half of the patients in our study,» Dr Brastianos will say.
When subjects decided to donate their money, Harbaugh and Mayr found,
brain areas involved in processing rewards lit up more
than they did when the
decision to donate was not their own, but was instead dictated by the experimenters.
Young adults with thinner cortex in particular
brain regions are more impulsive during a
decision - making task
than teens with thicker cortex, according to a large correlational study of adolescents from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort.
Researches on
decision - making from neurobiological aspect have been performed by using monkeys and rodents, although the details of the mechanisms have been unclear because their
brain consists of more
than hundreds of millions of nerve cells.
By studying other parts of the
brain in both humans and monkeys, however, a team from Johns Hopkins University has now concluded that last - minute
decision - making is a lot more complicated
than previously known, involving complex neural coordination among multiple
brain areas.
The fundamental trade - off between speed and accuracy in
decision making has been studied for more
than a century, with a number of studies suggesting that the subthalamic nucleus region of the
brain plays a key role.
For the first time, researchers find that
decisions based on unconscious learning, or knowledge we don't know we know, may rely on entirely different
brain pathways
than the parts of the
brain we use when we make conscious, rational choices.
The scans revealed that when praised, 13 of the dogs showed equal or greater levels of
brain activity in the region that controls
decision - making and signals rewards
than when they received food, the scientists will report in an upcoming issue of Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
Just as he had predicted, personal moral
decisions tended to stimulate certain parts of the
brain more
than impersonal moral
decisions.
Researchers have identified a
brain pathway that plays an important role in making survival
decisions — such as a mouse's
decision to flee rather
than try to mate when confronted by a cat.
A
brain in balance, rather
than the promise of pain or pleasure, may form basis of
decision - making for psychiatric patients
Those who were Web - experienced showed twice as much activity in parts of the
brain associated with complex reasoning and
decision - making
than those without search experience, according to the study in the American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
When students make more of their own
decisions during the adolescent and teen years, their
brains are still programmed for immediate gratification, pushing limits, and exploring rather
than thoughtfully considering consequences.
Beyond the all - star roster in Cut - Up, one of the exhibition's greatest achievements is presenting a survey that evades the failures of most institutional overviews, such as wall text that expects
brain - dead viewers who need overbearing guidance through the works, or sloppy curatorial
decisions that produce more incongruities
than enlightening insights.
The basic insight behind market capitalism is one shared by
brain scientists, computer programmers, ecologists, evolutionary biologists, and social change theorists, to wit: a large assemblage of dumb (limited information) actors will make, in the aggregate, better
decisions than a small set of smart (high information) actors.
That said, as far as recent developments in neuroscience go, it is a great tool for getting out of what I call the back alley of the
brain (amygdala) and returning to the forehead (pre frontal cortex) so that you can make reasoned rather
than reactive
decisions.
But more
than that, it also needs to be structured for the
brains of key
decision - makers.
An fMRI study by UCLA suggested that, in people who were considered «web - literate», conduct Google searches shows more activity in
brain areas involved in
decision making and reasoning
than reading a book: