Not exact matches
In an interview on the Time's podcast The Daily, reporter Michael Schmidt explains that
about three - quarters of the 49 questions are intended to glean Trump's motivations behind
decisions, statements and tweets
about various topics — and indicate that investigators are looking at a potential obstruction of
justice case.
The Virginia residents challenging their state districting plan said the lower court ignored a 2015 Supreme Court
decision about Alabama in which
Justice Anthony Kennedy joined the four more liberal
justices to order a review of state legislative districts.
The
decision by
Justice Jennifer Schecter of the New York state court in Manhattan in favor of California restaurateur Summer Zervos, a former contestant on NBC's «The Apprentice,» raises the prospect that Trump might have to answer embarrassing questions in court
about his behavior toward women.
(2) Bringing this case into court for litigation may be unusual but is not surprising; and (3) The concern
about political influence in making this
decision is an unfortunate cost of candidate and President Trump's disregard for the institutions of
justice.
But his
decision to do so while facing increasing scrutiny — the deepening FBI probe regarding his administration's contact with Russia and damning new Senate testimony from former acting attorney general Sally Yates
about Trump's now - fired national security adviser Michael Flynn — instantly recalls Richard Nixon's infamous «Saturday Night Massacre» in which the 37th president purged the
Justice Department during the Watergate investigation.
In a guest column for The Hollywood Reporter, the mogul reflected on his desire to «amplify» discussions around issues of social
justice, and the
decision to produce documentaries
about Kalief Browder and Trayvon Martin.
So it's very inefficient and it's an unethical position, because if I'm making judgments in my head
about you or vice versa and I'm not allowing you to be part of that
decision and understand the criteria, one of the most basic things of
justice is the right to face one's accuser.
The president also complained
about Session's
decision to recuse himself from the Russia investigation, a longtime sticking point for Trump, who felt that his top
Justice Department official should have done more to protect him.
There are many ways to resolve concerns
about the deal, a
Justice official said on Wednesday, adding that no
decision had been made and that conversations with AT&T were continuing.
But as with past Supreme Court ATS
decisions, the
justices once again failed to shut the door entirely on human rights activists: the ruling said nothing
about the many ATS claims pending against American corporations.
And how much was the timing of Trump's
decision shaped by events spiraling out of his control — such as Monday's testimony
about Russian interference by former acting attorney general Sally Yates, or the fact that Comey last week requested more resources from the
Justice Department to expand the FBI's Russia probe?
The particular mechanisms employed depend on circumstances of history, geography, and culture, and
decisions about them can be made responsibly only by taking account of man's acquisitive propensities, his need for rational order, his longing for freedom, and his sense of
justice — in short, by relying on an integral rather than a truncated conception of human nature.
On the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court's 1973
decision legalizing abortion,
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg announced her misgivings
about the ruling.
Watson seemed particularly rankled by the
Justice Department's plea for him to rule specifically on the language of the travel ban itself and not make his
decision based on some of President Trump and his colleagues» language
about the ban — language which made it clear the ban violates the spirit of the Constitution.
It is the confident statement
about the intentions of God that all might be one in Christ, that love and
justice will dominate political
decisions, that all persons will be liberated from the bondage of sin, seif - centeredness, racial pride, arrogance, and despair.
They dispute among themselves
about whether this or that public policy is the violation of the value of
justice, or whether a certain action is the breaking of a contract, or whether a certain
decision constitutes infidelity to a promise.
Our inheritance of Reformation iconoclasm is usually put forward as the traditional reason for our discomfort; and in the mainline churches our commitment to social
justice and our resulting
decisions about stewardship are cited as contemporary explanation and justification.
Suffice it to say that the conceptuality which I accept — and accept because it seems to do
justice to deep analysis of human experience and observation, as well as to the knowledge we now have of the way «things go» in the world — lays stress on the dynamic «event» character of that world; on the inter-relationships which exist in what is a societal universe, on the inadequacy of «substance» thinking to describe such a universe of «becoming» and «belonging», on the place of
decisions in freedom by the creatures with the consequences which such
decisions bring
about, and on the central importance of persuasion rather than coercive force as a clue to the «going» of things in that universe.
In the landmark Schempp - Murray
decisions, it often has been overlooked that although the
justices forbade worship in the schools, they encouraged «teaching
about religion.»
«While we are glad to see and commend the local authorities under international pressure acted swiftly and fairly to resolve the church's land with this right
decision, we are still deeply concerned
about the
justice for this family of martyr which is still not done,» stated Bob Fu, China Aid's president.
John Durie has an item in this weekend's Australian
about Justice Mansfield's
decision to write to state premiers and others regarding Murray Goulburn's authorisation application relating to its bid for Warrnambool Cheese & Butter.
Taylor made the crass remarks during a radio interview, in which he was talking
about Evans»
decision to maintain his innocence after being convicted of raping a 19 year - old girl in Rhyl, comparing the former Welsh international's situation to the families» long fight for
justice:
The second question is related to the above: a «free market» baseline of
justice is
about procedure - how outcomes are arrived at, who is involved in making
decisions, has rights over their own actions, how actions are agreed by parties etc. (or something like that) whereas equality is an outcome, that may or may not be achieved under various procedural arrangements, and may or may not be viewed as desirable by people who hold different views
about what forms of society - specifications over who has what rights to do what to who.
Justice Dery's lawyers raised concerns
about the
decision and proceeded to the Supreme Court to cite her for bias.
Findings in neuroscience and neurochemistry, for example, can also help us better understand the biological underpinnings of dignity and
justice or inform us
about how moral
decisions and tradeoffs occur.
Perhaps no one will be watching as closely as President Obama, who insists he won't get an early heads up from the
justices about their
decision on the signature achievement of his four - year tenure.
«Mayor de Blasio's
decision to drop the Floyd appeal is good news for all New Yorkers who care
about both
justice and crime prevention.
Scottish Labour's community safety spokesman James Kelly said more details were needed
about the
decision by Scottish
justice secretary Kenny MacAskill to free Megrahi last August.
Also, we have yet to hear much
about the governor's plan to reform the criminal
justice system, of which he pledged a «soup to nuts» review in the wake of the Eric Garner grand jury
decision.
The report, however, commended the former attorney general, Betty Mould Iddrissu, for negotiating down the 163million euros to 94 million euros «This
decision by the then Attorney - General and Minister of
Justice Betty Mould - Iddrisu, which recommended and insisted that the awards which she had managed to negotiate downwards from
about 163 million Euros ($ 163 million) to 94 million Euros ($ 94 million) should be satisfied and paid by the State was, in the opinion of this Commission, one of the best
decisions that could be taken in the interest of the State.
We can not have a situation where more and more
decisions about Scotland are being taken in Scotland, and yet Scottish MPs come to Westminster and vote on English - only issues, shaping the destiny of health, education,
justice, environment and probably taxation, too, in England, potentially against the wishes of most English representatives.
Meanwhile, an Albany Law School expert says Chief
Justice John Roberts may have been concerned
about his legacy, and that was a factor in his
decision.
I used tweet
about the
decisions he used to make at the Department of
Justice, because he has really stood strong and has an incredible trajectory,» Ms. Mark - Viverito said.
«We can not go on seeing crucial
decisions about our society and our system of
justice and government being taken by unaccountable European courts.»
DiNapoli on Monday called the
decision by the
Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs «troubling» and said it raises questions
about its performance.
«President Trump's abrupt and unexplained
decision to summarily remove over 40 U.S. Attorneys has once again caused chaos in the federal government and led to questions
about whether the
Justice Department's vital and non-partisan work will continue under Attorney General Sessions, as it must.»
Watch for heightened debate - and finally some
decisions -
about recurring issues: the state's Brownfield Tax Credit program,
justice reforms (see below), renewing the New York City mayor's power over its massive school district, and, of course, school funding.
Research led by Sophieke Russell at the University of Kent in Canterbury, UK, holds important lessons
about how juries arrive at
decisions of guilt and sentencing — and possible pointers for achieving genuine
justice in courts.
Although Lamberth hasn't yet set a schedule for both sides to file documents in the case, the expectation is that he would not move ahead before the appeals court has made a
decision about the Department of
Justice's (DOJ's) request to stay the preliminary injunction.
During the hearing, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D — RI) asked Sessions how he would approach «making a
decision about the facts of climate change» if a case before the Department of
Justice required it.
The reconstituted Supreme Court of President Bush and Chief
Justice John G. Roberts rendered two significant constitutional
decisions about schools in its October 2006 term, one «for» and one «against» school administrators.
Levinson's team has posted a number of other case studies on
Justice in Schools and published still more in Dilemmas of Educational Ethics, specifically to help educators, administrators, parents, and even students themselves have productive conversations
about hard
decisions.
Our goals will be to deepen our own understandings of educational
justice, to engage with others
about complex ethical judgments across multiple lines of difference, and to learn how to enhance educators» and policymakers» capacities to make ethical
decisions under challenging conditions.»
Johnson also expressed concern
about the «schools - to - prisons» pipeline, something Foxx addressed during a speech last week when she suggested authorities were far to quick to arrest and prosecute Chicago Public Schools students for fighting on school grounds —
decisions that bring them into the criminal
justice system.
But in a dissenting opinion,
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, argued that the
decision was not just
about a playground.
Concern for environmental
justice should be integrated into every transportation
decision from the first thought
about a transportation plan to post-construction operations and maintenance.
Why do Meyer, Berko, and Bina agree to suppress their knowledge of a vast conspiracy, and what does that
decision reveal
about their own sense of the balance between
justice and self - preservation?
Your Kindle purchases are
about to get dearer following a
decision by the European Court of
Justice (ECJ) that France and Luxembourg can no longer charge a reduced rate of VAT for ebooks.
And although he understands the passion behind fighting for
justice for animals, Tony advises those starting out in animal law to be as pragmatic and dispassionate
about their analysis of issues as possible while planning their strategies, because «ultimately the judge will have to base his or her
decision on a rational legal basis.»
FSP also partners with food - focused organizations, offering a venue for local leaders, young and old, to educate the community
about food
justice issues and inspire us to make the most informed consumer
decisions possible within the global foodshed we are a part of.