«These elected, parent - majority bodies make critical
decisions about school programs, budgets, and leadership at most CPS schools,» she says.
Not exact matches
Nor is the problem that he went so far as to argue that the Court should «ignore» both the fact that the voucher
program was initiated in response to a severe educational crisis in the Cleveland public
schools and the fact that parental
decisions about how to spend their vouchers were voluntary.
(Indeed, fascinating histories might be written of major changes in the identities of both denominational and university - related theological
schools that came
about over the past thirty years not by grand vision and masterful
decision but through the accumulated impact of individual
decisions about particular proposed courses,
programs for this and centers for that.)
While I was on my break, some of you may have read
about a controversial
decision by the New York City Department of Education to discontinue a popular NYC
school lunch
program run by Wellness in the
Schools (WITS).
And yes, I get it that we don't let kids make
decisions about the most important things in life; on the other hand, we didn't have a whole lot of support from
school admins, or even from parents (who relied on the sale of soda and junk at
school events to fund enrichment
programs) at that time to eliminate junk from
schools.
School decision makers 1) plug in simple information, 2) explore different ways to expand school meals programs like moving breakfast to the classroom or serving afterschool meals, and 3) come out with hard data about costs, number of students served and federal reimbursement do
School decision makers 1) plug in simple information, 2) explore different ways to expand
school meals programs like moving breakfast to the classroom or serving afterschool meals, and 3) come out with hard data about costs, number of students served and federal reimbursement do
school meals
programs like moving breakfast to the classroom or serving afterschool meals, and 3) come out with hard data
about costs, number of students served and federal reimbursement dollars.
Former Senate President Andy Gardiner, who has a son with Down syndrome and helped create the
program, said he hopes the «governor is mindful» that the bill isn't just
about charter
schools and that many families will be affected by his
decision.
Moskowitz answered
about a dozen questions, with topics including whether there is any potential mayoral candidate who embodies what she wants in a candidate, whether she plans on being involved in the 2017 election, why she is «such a lightning rod» for criticism, obstacles ahead, the City's pre-K
program, whether she'll run for office at another time, whether she reflexively criticizes all education - related actions of Mayor de Blasio, whether she's concerned that her influence on state government will diminish because of her
decision, discipline and suspension polices at Success Academy
schools, her plans for other projects and her view on potential mayoral candidacies of Rep. Hakeem Jeffries and Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr..
Watch for heightened debate - and finally some
decisions -
about recurring issues: the state's Brownfield Tax Credit
program, justice reforms (see below), renewing the New York City mayor's power over its massive
school district, and, of course,
school funding.
There are many steps to take and choices to make, but one of the first up will be the
decision about which graduate
schools or
programs to apply to.
«Most people think that it was a mistake,» says Jules LaPides, outgoing president of the 400 - member Council of Graduate
Schools (CGS),
about the NRC's
decision to gather lots of kinds of data, but to rank
programs simply by reputation.
Paul E. Peterson talks with Anna Egalite of N.C. State
about her new study looking at why some private
schools do and others don't participate in North Carolina's means - tested voucher
program and also at how families make the
decision about whether or not to use a
school voucher.
Clearly, if you want to make
decisions about quality of teaching and the impact of
school programs, you must examine not what children know on one occasion, like today, but how their knowledge and skills change over the course of their entire exposure to the teacher or the
program.
Second, the
school is run by a cooperative of teachers, who make all the key
decisions about the
school — from the learning
program to the budget to hiring and firing.
A unitary accountability system enables the state to fairly and transparently monitor
program compliance and inform the public
about performance; make difficult
decisions about withholding funds, intervening with local boards, and taking over
schools and districts; and uniformly and thoroughly administer federal
programs.
Federal guidelines now ask
school and district staff to use research evidence when making
decisions about policies and
programs.
Once parents make the
decision about where the $ 500 will be spent, the principal and teachers in that
school or
program decide how it will be spent.
And as Andy Smarick has argued, voucher
programs need something akin to authorizers, too, so that
decisions about participating
schools can be informed by nuance and human judgment, not just by test scores and other data points.
To make accurate
decisions about the quality of teaching and the impact of
school programs, Willett and Singer urge policymakers to examine not what different classes of children know at each grade level, but how the knowledge and skills of specific groups change over time.
Only 46 per cent were involved in peer support
programs and one - third said they had helped make
decisions about how their
school is run.
If pressed to make a solo
decision about the windfall's disbursement, however, Potter would probably use it to fund before -
school, after -
school, and summer tutoring
programs.
What
about adults lacking literacy: why are
programs for adult students separated from broader
schooling decisions?
While allowing for a range of NNRs to satisfy the ESA testing requirement provides information
about student performance, NNRs do not drive
school - level content
decisions the way criterion - referenced statewide assessments can, which research suggests can dissuade private
school leaders from participating in education choice
programs.
Does this
school have formal and informal policies and structures in place to engage parents and communities in
school decisions about programs, curriculum or budgets?
In an American Enterprise Institute survey of private
schools, 79 percent of Louisiana
school leaders reported that concerns
about program regulations played a deciding factor in their
decision not to accept LSP students, including 64 percent who listed this as a major factor.
Columbia University professor Amy Stuart Wells, for example, concluded that the
decisions of St. Louis parents participating in a voluntary desegregation
program were based «on a perception that county is better than city and white is better than black, not on factual information
about the
schools.»
Robert Pianta, dean of the University of Virginia's Curry
School of Education, explained that Relay is creating a «feedback loop,» using child - level data to measure the outcomes of its teacher - training
program, and using those measures to make
decisions about program design.
District leaders recognized the need to develop capacity for data use among
school personnel, particularly in
decisions about school - improvement initiatives and instructional
programs.
We expect lawmakers to hear testimony that will inform critical
decisions they will make in the future
about arming teachers, placing resource and police officers in
schools, and providing funding for
programs that will improve
school climate and -LSB-...]
Second, few educators of the gifted would argue with the core tenets set forth in Turning Points (Carnegie Task Force on the Education of Young Adolescents, 1989) that middle
school programs should: (1) create small communities of learning within larger
school settings, (2) teach a solid academic core, (3) ensure success for all students, (4) enable educators closest to students to make important
decisions about teaching and learning, (5) staff middle
schools with teachers trained to work effectively with early adolescents, (6) promote health and fitness, (7) involve families in the education of learners, and (8) connect
schools with communities.
In some
schools, for example, teachers used diagnostic and formative assessment data to make
decisions about student placement in remedial reading or math
programs, or in
school - based tutoring
programs.
The categories included
program characteristics (explicitly articulated objectives and role expectations, provision for continuous student progress, flexibility in matching materials and instruction to student needs, and stability of
programs over several years), leadership behaviors (establishing reading improvement as a
school priority, being knowledgeable
about reading instruction, actively facilitating instructional
decisions, establishing and maintaining monitoring of student progress, and evaluating teachers), and psychological conditions (high expectations for students, calm and businesslike
school climate, staff commitment to the reading
program, staff cooperation, parental involvement, and attribution of reading failure to
program defects).
As per Weingarten: «Over a year ago, the Washington [DC] Teachers» Union filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to see the data from the
school district's IMPACT [teacher] evaluation system — a system that's used for big choices, like the firing of 563 teachers in just the past four years, curriculum
decisions,
school closures and more [see prior posts
about this as related to the IMPACT
program here].
For state, district, and
school leaders, value - added measures may aid in
school improvement in at least three ways: improving
programs, making
decisions about human resources, and developing incentives for better performance.
In every
decision I made
about the
schools I led — be it professional development,
program development,
school culture, instructional focus and feedback systems, or curriculum design — any idea or insight I had was always sharpened and strengthened by including my colleagues in the conversation.
School, district, and state leaders may be able to improve teaching by using value - added to shape
decisions about programs, human resources, and incentives.
Charter public
schools provide
school teachers, administrators, and board members the flexibility to shape important
decisions about working conditions; the mission, curriculum and instruction,
programs and services, schedules, budgeting, and staffing — with the goal of improving educational outcomes for students.
Districts, states, and
schools can, at least in theory, generate gains in educational outcomes for students using value - added measures in three ways: creating information on effective
programs, making better
decisions about human resources, and establishing incentives for higher performance from teachers.
In making the
decision to move to a full - day kindergarten and to design effective
programs, a number of educators, policymakers, parents, and family members have contacted the Ask A REL Reference Desk seeking both research on the impact of full - day kindergarten and information
about the
program models used in other states and
schools.
Thus, while Kentucky purports to treat educators as professionals and empower them to make
decisions about how best to meet student learning goals, the top - down, mandated Primary
School Program controls and directs how elementary educators are to meet those goals.
Schools also begin conducting data reviews to evaluate their
programs and make data - based
decisions about students.
Using data from these assessments,
schools now make
decisions about individual students, groups of students, instructional
programs, resource allocation, and more.
Only
about half of the private
schools participating in voucher
programs provided special education or disability related information on their websites, creating a significant problem for families making a
decision about where to send their children.
In charter
schools, teachers, administrators, and board members shape important
decisions about working conditions, including the mission, curriculum and instruction,
programs and services, schedules, budgeting, and staffing — with the goal of improving educational outcomes for students.
In short, this change in policy merely gives
schools more flexibility with respect to how the funds can be used and leaves the
decision about the best way to do so — be it for expanded learning time or out - of -
school time
programming — up to them.
Step 3: Study the
school's structure: For most parents, this meant learning everything they could
about the
school - it's
programs, it's policies, the identity of the key
decision - makers and, especially, the educational point of view of the
decision - makers.
From the middle of the 20th century, when states began experimenting with mandatory yearly testing through the Obama era and the «Race to the Top»
program, we have seen states take a greater share of the power to assess learning and make
decisions about student promotion, teacher ability, and
school effectiveness based on these assessments.
However, parent and families»
decisions about schools happen in the context of State over-investment and policy in favor of public
school choice
programs and under - investment in other public
schools with high proportions of low income and Black, Puerto Rican, and Latino children.
Therefore, what we did was to offer
school staffs a framework for making their own
decisions about how they might redesign their reading
program.
The report looks at 25 top SEL
programs to identify and summarize key features and attributes of
programming for elementary - age children, addressing the need for detailed information
about SEL curricula and implementation to help
schools and OST providers make informed
decisions.