Sentences with phrase «decisions affecting»

In a recent decision, Santo v. Santo (citation not yet available), published July 11, 2016, the Maryland Court of Appeals confirmed a trial judge's authority to award one party tie - breaking authority, for legal custody, even when parents have an inability to communicate on major decisions affecting the health, education, welfare, religion of a minor child.

This imbalance can create problems in situations where decisions affecting your stepchild's welfare must be made quickly, but you lack the legal authority to do so.

The plan should indicate whether you will have shared parental responsibility, indicating whether both parents will jointly make major decisions affecting the welfare of the children or whether both parents will make decisions together unless there's disagreement, then one parent will have the final decision - making authority on certain subjects, or if one parent will have sole parental responsibility and make major decisions alone.

The aim of capacity building is to ensure Indigenous people have the opportunity for effective ongoing participation in decisions affecting their land; it does not make those decisions.

If a «right to negotiate», or similar method of including traditional owners in decisions affecting their land were not included in the Act, native title parties could seek injunctions or other relief to protect their rights.

the right of Indigenous people to effective participation in decisions affecting them, their lands and territories: as required by ICCPR, Article 1 and the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), Article 1.

the full and effective participation of Indigenous people in decisions affecting funding distribution and service delivery;

2.3 The right of Indigenous people to self - determination and effective participation in decisions affecting them, their lands and territories.

Traditional owners need to have a greater degree of control over decisions affecting their land.

Their practical consequence for native title parties is that the few procedural rights that do exist under the NTA do not necessarily provide an opportunity for Indigenous parties to negotiate with government on how decisions affecting their land should be made.

The first chapter of this year's report examines how the operation and administration of the right to negotiate by state and territory governments and administrative tribunals limit the right of Indigenous people to participate in decisions affecting their land and to determine their economic, social and cultural development.

One of the relevant human rights principles I covered in my submissions to the Inquiry was the importance of effective participation of Indigenous groups in decisions affecting them.

The Commission urges the Authority, in its implementation of the legislation, to ensure that its actions are not only consistent with the procedural rights afforded to Traditional Owners by the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), but that the free, prior and informed consent of Indigenous peoples is obtained before decisions affecting their lands and waters are made.

They allow for individual native title groups, government and industry to negotiate agreements that are appropriate to their circumstances and which respect Indigenous peoples» rights to effective participation in decisions affecting themselves, their lands and territories.

The appeal decisions affecting the Larrakia in 2007 [151] and the Noongar in 2008 show that the law about continuity of traditional connection needs to be brought back into line with the overall logic of Mabo.

All decisions affecting Indigenous land must be taken with the free, prior and informed consent of Indigenous land holders.

Depending on the circumstances of the case, each party is entitled to significant periods of parenting time with their children and input into major decisions affecting the children, including education, religion and non-emergency medical procedures.

Queensland also attempted to introduce a comprehensive alternative state regime that would substantially curtail the capacity of registered native title claimants to participate in decisions affecting their claimed lands.

Free, prior and informed consent and the Engaging Communities guidelines provide a clear framework for ensuring effective participation of Indigenous communities in decisions affecting their rights and interests.

While Indigenous interests can be represented by non-Indigenous experts, human rights principles require that no decisions affecting native title land should be made without the informed consent of those affected.

the full and effective participation of Indigenous peoples in decisions affecting funding distribution and service delivery;

Employment intelligence aims to improve business insight to support better recruitment and other decisions affecting employees generally, by increasing the quality, reliability and visibility of information available to management.

Serve as advocate for patient in regard to decisions affecting care plan.

About Blog This blog offers you regular updates on the latest legal and policy decisions affecting the food and agribusiness industry.

Los Angeles Environmental Lawyer Steve Holzer discusses environmental issues and legal decisions affecting everything from Agriculture to Wind Energy.

But for the previous few weeks I had been under a lot of stress, dealing with a trying family matter that demanded I juggle lots of critical details and make important decisions affecting a family member.

Now it seems the high court is more easily persuaded to expand liability, as it has done with decisions affecting asbestos litigation, medical liability, workers» compensation and «bad faith» claims against insurers.

Still, this has not prevented Jackson's mother from seeking to have herself appointed as an executor or to try to obtain a say on decisions affecting estate assets.

sole legal custody: A court order that says one parent has the legal right to make major decisions affecting the child, like health care, education, and religion.

The experienced High Calgary Matrimonial Property Spousal Support lawyers at MacLean Law track decisions affecting high net worth Calgary family law clients and those include cases involving High Calgary Matrimonial Property Spousal Support so we remain on the cutting edge of high net worth family and divorce law.

As you watch the video, remember this is a position for someone who will make tremendous decisions affecting people in court.

This is not to say that a partner in a firm can never be an employee under the Code, but in the absence of any genuine control of M in the significant decisions affecting the workplace, there was no employment relationship between him and the partnership under the provisions of the Code.

The legal industry has historically been dominated by a top - down management mentality, which is to say that the most senior personnel are the ones who make the majority of the decisions affecting the firm.

This issue should not be confused with the issue of Shared Parental Responsibility (legal custody), which is awarded to both parents in the vast majority of cases and which gives each parent the same right to participate in making important decisions affecting their children in areas such as education, medical care, religious upbringing, etc..

Moreover, the Supreme Court issued this land alongside a harsh rebuke to the provincial and federal governments, finding they failed to properly consult and accommodate the Tsilhqot» in Nation on decisions affecting the land's development.

While custody refers to the right to make decisions affecting your child's wellbeing, it does not relate to how much time you spend with your child.

You deserve an attorney who returns your phone calls, keeps you informed about your case and consults you on major decisions affecting your case.

Shared parental responsibility is a court ordered relationship in which both parents retain full parental rights and responsibilities and in which both parents confer with each other, so that major decisions affecting the welfare of the children will be determined jointly.

That means the parent has the right to participate in decisions affecting the child, regardless of how much time the child spends with the non-custodial parent.

If the parties can work together to make decisions affecting the children, then joint custody (joint decision making) makes sense.

Frequently the parties also engage the assistance of specialized experts who are jointly retained by the parties to provide them with information they deem essential in helping make the decisions affecting their particular issues, such as: tax accountants, financial planners, parenting coaches and counselors.

Legal custody refers to a parent's responsibility to make decisions affecting a child's physical, educational, and spiritual well - being.

Georgia courts decide two aspects of child custody: «legal custody,» or which parent has the responsibility to make decisions affecting a child's education, health, religion, and extracurricular activities, and «physical custody,» meaning where a child lives and his or her visitation schedule with each parent.

Family mediation is a voluntary process that allows parents to resolve their disputes over decisions affecting their children.

It is assumed that the two parents will reach an agreement on major decisions affecting their child.

Where there is sole custody, only one parent has custody and they have control of any and all major decisions affecting the child.

«Joint custody» means both parents make all the key decisions affecting the child, and the child lives with both parents, although not necessarily for an equal period of time.

That is because not all parents have parental responsibility — the legal right to make important decisions affecting their child, including choices about their education and the health.

A legal status or «custodianship» vesting authority to approve all major decisions affecting a minor child.

Increasingly, astute managers are exercising influence on virtually all decisions affecting the «business of law» and are providing management support to those lawyers who are responsible for managing and coordinating substantive practice areas.