Not exact matches
Professor Derr admits that we must [treat] them with a responsible stewardship and that the things we do to them should be limited
by «a realistic anthropocentrism, and inhere in
decisions about what is useful and valuable to
humanity.»
In actual fact, he lacks that capacity for communion with God and his own fulfillment — which are the same thing, seen from different angles — and in his concrete
humanity he is frustrated and, what is more important, he is responsibly aware of having made himself,
by accumulated
decisions, incapable of right relationships with his brethren.
So, when the time came to return to work and put my son into daycare, I earnestly prepared (read: overprepared)
by reading every pro-con article on the planet just to find the one confirming that putting my son into daycare was the best
decision for him and the rest of
humanity.
Although this
decision might make the film more accessible to a wider audience, as it is easier to understand what Amin does when it seems to be a direct result of information that cuts to his very core, it does weaken the larger political story overall
by making the focus more about crimes of passion than it is about crimes against
humanity.
Tron ends up being a really good movie broken
by one really, really, really stupid
decision: computer generated Jeff Bridges is a crime against
humanity.
This new status quo fractures the Avengers, resulting in two camps — one led
by Steve Rogers and his desire for the Avengers to remain free to defend
humanity without government interference, and the other following Tony Stark's surprising
decision to support government oversight and accountability.
I get that the repeated
decision to sacrifice an Infinity Stone for someone's survival is meant to prove their
humanity and set up a contrast with Thanos, who does the opposite
by killing a loved one for the Soul Stone.
He concluded
by saying this juncture in our history —
decisions (or indecision) in our lifetimes — constitutes «
humanity's final exam»:
But when it comes to the insignificant players in this saga, like you and me, there are those who like to be independent thinkers and
decision makers, irregardless of their lack of money or power, then there are those who are natural followers who don't mind being led
by the nose, especially when they are told they are doing good for
humanity.
The
decision by the U.S. on whether to continue pursuit of liquid fuel and other forms of energy from food and terrestrial ecosystems will be of great importance to the well - being and survival of
humanity and the Earth.
«The
decision made
by U.S. President Trump amounts to turning their backs on the wisdom of
humanity.
The spectre of
humanity raises itself yet again in the Pham case, a sentencing
decision from the Alberta Court of Appeal, to be heard
by the Supreme Court of Canada this Friday on January 18, 2013.