As Robert Holster, superintendent of the Passaic, New Jersey, school district for more than 16 years, lamented, «I run a lot of
decisions by legal counsel, getting input as to, «Is this the legal decision to make?»
Not exact matches
Lively, with representation
by Liberty
Counsel (an evangelical
legal organization), responded that in both the U.S. and Uganda he exercised constitutionally protected speech rights; that he opposes violence and neither committed nor plotted any; that Uganda did not in fact pass a proposed draconian anti-gay law, and that in any case Uganda's political institutions, instead of himself, are responsible for its political
decisions; and that the court lacks jurisdiction and the plaintiffs lack standing.
Atty. Zelda Soriano,
Legal Counsel for the Petitioners discussed the grounds on which the appellate court based their favorable
decision, which includes the main argument of the petitioners that the field testing is characterized
by «serious scientific uncertainty with regard to its health and environmental effects.»
Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of
Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen&ra
Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed
by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees,
by the weight of existing
legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen&ra
legal authority and prior to a
decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».
Gannett newspapers reported that Alphonso David, Gov. Andrew Cuomo's
legal counsel, has issued an edict that requires the bureaucracy headed
by Alain Kaloyeros to run all
decisions regarding the Buffalo Billion and nanotechnology projects in Albany past Bart Schwartz, who is heading the governor's review of numerous state economic development programs.
Gannett newspapers reported that Alphonso David, Gov. Andrew Cuomo's
legal counsel, has issued an edict that requires the bureaucracy headed
by Alain Kaloyeros to run all
decisions regarding the Buffalo Billion and nanotechnology projects in Albany past Bart Schwartz, who is heading the governor's review -LSB-...]
ACCC is approved
by the Department of Justice to provide the mandated pre-filing bankruptcy
counseling session that will analyze your current financial condition to enable you and your
legal counsel to make well - informed
decisions.
Mr. Whitney's representative work includes a series of successful outcomes pursuing false advertising claims against product review websites, a landmark victory clarifying copyright fair use and parody on behalf of several well - known musicians; a defense win dismissing copyright infringement claims brought
by a putative class of attorneys against the leading
legal research websites; a favorable outcome for a high - end beauty products company in a trademark and trade dress action against a manufacturer of knock - off products; a district and appellate court
decision dismissing all claims
by a proposed class against an international bank for alleged violations of, among other things, the Federal False Marking Act, RICO and the CAN - SPAM Act; and
counseling prominent art museums and galleries on domestic and international copyright issues.
Based on this
decision, it is sensible for companies to assume that any in - house
counsel communication may not be protected
by legal privilege.
In Alberta v. Suncor Energy Inc, 2016 ABQB 264, certain documents and records created or collected during an accident investigation were protected
by litigation and solicitor - client privilege where
legal counsel made
decisions with respect to the accident investigation within hours of the event.
The Appellant attended the hearing and was represented
by solicitors and
counsel who acted pro bono because he had been refused funding
by a
decision of the Special Controls Review Panel of the
Legal Aid Agency dated 7 October 2014 and sent on 14 October 2014 (six days before the hearing).
In the costs
decisions arising from the certification of the class proceedings styled Sankar v. Bell Mobility, Brown v. Canada (Attorney General), Crisante v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Dugal v. Manulife Financial, and Rosen v. BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc., Belobaba noted, in general, the amount of time spent
by legal counsel was too high, the volume of material filed with the court was excessive, oral hearings were too long, and
counsel over-litigated most issues.
By working with the Law Offices of David W. Wilcox, you will receive the
legal guidance and
counseling you need prior to making your
decision.
«
Legal Analytics plays a crucial role in helping attorneys unravel the complexity of commercial litigation by providing them with relevant data and information they can use to quickly make informed business and legal decisions and provide better counsel for their clients.&r
Legal Analytics plays a crucial role in helping attorneys unravel the complexity of commercial litigation
by providing them with relevant data and information they can use to quickly make informed business and
legal decisions and provide better counsel for their clients.&r
legal decisions and provide better
counsel for their clients.»
Having
legal counsel by your side increases your chances of making the right
decision.
The fifth edition of the Enterprise
Legal Management Trends Report, powered
by LexisNexis ® CounselLink ®, provides a mid-year check on the six key metrics that help guide corporate
counsel and law firm the
decision making.
In a 2014
decision, investigation
counsel Jessica Caplan concluded that the
legal judgment involved in Deloitte's services was provided
by an «Instructing Lawyer, who determines the parameters of the document review search.»
A prime example of this advent is the recent
decision by DXC and its general
counsel Bill Deckelman to join with ALSP UnitedLex to restructure and «re-badge» its in - house team and deploy over 250 United Lex senior level professionals, in what the two companies label «the largest - ever managed services transaction in the
legal industry.»
In Allison, Mr. Justice Long refereed to R.v. Kerr, an unreported
decision in which Mr. Justice Bruce held that the police pre-empted the accused's right to
counsel by waiting only 2 to 4 minutes after he left a message with his lawyer, then calling
Legal Aid on his behalf without telling him that he could call his lawyer again, or any other lawyer, or asking if he wished to speak to
Legal Aid.
The Immigrant
Legal Resource Center has posted a fact sheet about DACA and the
decision to rescind it, which gives a good overview of the situation for non-immigration
counsel and can also be provided directly to your clients who are affected
by or have questions about the DACA rescission.
Given that, I don't think it's unreasonable to hold someone responsible for a
legal decision they made, especially when they were being advised
by counsel.
Each side must be represented
by legal counsel, and the
decision reached
by the panel is final.
* The Hearing Panel's
decision shall be considered final only when it is in writing and signed
by members of the panel following their personal review and any review
by legal counsel which may be required.